On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> > I don't think this API will make the non-C++-fans happier; I think the
>> > objection to the work I just merged is that it's adding more C++ than
>> > those people are comfortable with.
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I don't think this API will make the non-C++-fans happier; I think the
> > objection to the work I just merged is that it's adding more C++ than
> > those people are comfortable with.
>
> How so? It's already super-ugly in those views. We deci
On 11/20/2014 08:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 11/19/2014 05:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Ric
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
>> wrote:
>> >On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
>> > wro
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 05:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
>>> wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
On 11/19/2014 05:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM
On 11/19/2014 05:28 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 17:24 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 8:26:2
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 17:24 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
> > wrote:
> > >On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >> On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
> >
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 22:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
> wrote:
> >On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
> > wrote:
> >>> On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> >>>
>
On November 19, 2014 10:09:56 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod
> wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>>
(A) could become:
greturn *stmt = gsi->as_a_greturn ()
On 11/19/2014 03:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
(A) could become:
greturn *stmt = gsi->as_a_greturn ();
(B) could become:
stmt = gsi->dyn_cast ();
if (!stmt)
or:
stmt = g
On November 19, 2014 8:26:23 PM CET, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
>>
>> (A) could become:
>>
>>greturn *stmt = gsi->as_a_greturn ();
>>
>> (B) could become:
>>
>>stmt = gsi->dyn_cast ();
>>if (!stmt)
>
>> or:
>>
>>stmt = gsi->dyn_cast_gcall
On 11/19/2014 01:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
(A) could become:
greturn *stmt = gsi->as_a_greturn ();
(B) could become:
stmt = gsi->dyn_cast ();
if (!stmt)
or:
stmt = gsi->dyn_cast_gcall ();
if (!stmt)
or maybe:
stmt = gsi->is_a_gcall ();
if (!stmt)
An earlier ver
I've committed the cut-down version of the gimple statement subclasses
work to svn trunk [specifically the gimple-classes-v2-option-3 git
branch, having bootstrapped®rested it on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
(Fedora 20)].
This is the the 89-patch kit from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/
14 matches
Mail list logo