RE: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-19 Thread qiaopeixin
Thanks. All the best, Peixin -Original Message- From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 5:56 PM To: qiaopeixin Cc: Christophe Lyon ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value

RE: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-19 Thread qiaopeixin
sts. All the best, Peixin -Original Message- From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 1:01 AM To: qiaopeixin Cc: Christophe Lyon ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

RE: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-17 Thread qiaopeixin
Original Message- From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 8:19 PM To: Christophe Lyon Cc: qiaopeixin ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479] Christophe Lyon writes: > On Thu, 1

RE: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-12 Thread qiaopeixin
Thanks for the review and commit. All the best, Peixin -Original Message- From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com] Sent: 2020年8月13日 0:25 To: qiaopeixin Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479

PING: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-11 Thread qiaopeixin
PING this issue. -邮件原件- 发件人: qiaopeixin 发送时间: 2020年8月6日 21:01 收件人: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' 抄送: 'richard.sandif...@arm.com' 主题: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479] Hi, The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will r

[PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]

2020-08-06 Thread qiaopeixin
Hi, The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will report an ICE in the expand pass since '-mgeneral-regs-only' is incompatible with the use of V4SI mode. I propose to report the diagnostic information instead of ICE, and the problem has been discussed on PR 96479. I attached the