omotions. (This is particularly
>> helpful if one wants to quickly check whether a certain code has a bug
>> limiting
>> its precision away from full machine accuracy.)
>>
>
> I plan to commit the attached patch this weekend.
>
> 2011-11-09 Zydrunas Gimbutas
>
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>> -freal-4-real-8 is not equivalent to -fdefault-real-8 and -fdefault-double-8.
>>
>> -freal-4-real-8 interprets any 4-byte real type, whether it is a
>> default real type or explicitly declared as 4-byte, as a 8-byte double
>> precision
Hi all,
Attached are three test file, that stress the type-promotion patch.
>> The difference between -fdefault-*-8 and -f*-4-*-8 should probably also be
>> documented.
>>
>
> It is documented for the -freal-* options. The manual has, for example,
>
> -freal-4-real-8
> Promote REAL(KIND=4)
