[RFC PATCH v3] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2024-02-01 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
should be in the dev environment, and not as a NixOS distro package manager. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo --- v3: moved the flake to contrib/ instead of installing it at the root of the repository .gitignore| 1 + contrib/nix/flake.nix | 35 +++ 2

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2024-02-01 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
n 1/31/24 4:43 PM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote: > > This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in > > Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems > > from the recognized need within our community for a more > > streamlined and efficient development process when

[RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2024-01-31 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
should be in the dev environment, and not as a NixOS distro package manager. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo --- .gitignore| 1 + contrib/nix/flake.nix | 35 +++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 contrib/nix/flake.nix diff --git a

[RFC PATCH 0/1] Nix Environment Support for GCC Development

2024-01-31 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639308.html Cheers, Vincent. Vincenzo Palazzo (1): nix: add a simple flake nix shell .gitignore| 1 + contrib/nix/flake.nix | 35 +++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 contrib/nix/flake.nix

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-11 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
distro's repository? What makes this a distro build package? and not a developer configuration for building a development environment? Cheers, Vincent. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:43 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > On 12/5/23 5:35 AM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote: > >>> I see, but to me,

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-05 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
e job of the distro. Cheers, Vincent. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:03 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:26 AM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > > > On 12/4/23 9:01 PM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jeff Law wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-04 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
n 12/4/23 18:02, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:58 PM Vincenzo Palazzo > > wrote: > >> > >> This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in > >> Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems > >> from the recog

[RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-04 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems from the recognized need within our community for a more streamlined and efficient development process when using Nix. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo --- flake.lock | 60

[RFC PATCH 0/1] Improved Nix Support for GCC Development

2023-12-04 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
appreciate your consideration of this contribution and am open to any feedback or suggestions for improvement. Cheers, Vincent Vincenzo Palazzo (1): nix: add a simple flake nix shell flake.lock | 60 ++ flake.nix | 35

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-04 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
but is just giving an agnostic way to develop with GCC. OFC is most useful with NixOs because it does not have apt or pacman or any other kind of package manager. Cheers, Vincent. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 12/4/23 18:38, Vincenzo Palazzo wrot

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] nix: add a simple flake nix shell

2023-12-04 Thread Vincenzo Palazzo
However, I understand your point. Cheers, Vincent. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:01 AM Vincenzo Palazzo wrote: > > >Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets > involved with. > > I see, but to me, this do not look like a distro build procedure,