Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpp: fix __has_include in traditional mode

Hi Nathan, On 29.07.20 14:52, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 7/28/20 3:28 AM, Tiziano Müller wrote: Hi there, this patch intends to fix the regression introduced in gcc 10 with __has_include, see also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Thanks, do you have write access?  I don&#

[PATCH 1/2] libcpp: fix __has_include handling with traditional-cpp

fixes #95889 --- libcpp/init.c| 3 +++ libcpp/traditional.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libcpp/init.c b/libcpp/init.c index 0aac5acd0a3..b0cf7119258 100644 --- a/libcpp/init.c +++ b/libcpp/init.c @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ static const struct builtin_ma

[PATCH 0/2] cpp: fix __has_include in traditional mode

Hi there, this patch intends to fix the regression introduced in gcc 10 with __has_include, see also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Best, Tiziano Tiziano Müller (2): libcpp: fix __has_include handling with traditional-cpp [testsuite] add tests for __has_include with

[PATCH 2/2] [testsuite] add tests for __has_include with traditional-cpp

/ChangeLog index 477804eec9b..18f81e1befa 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2020-07-27 Tiziano Müller + + * c-c++-common/cpp/has-include-1-traditional.c: New test. + 2020-07-27 Hans-Peter Nilsson * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-20.c