On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:51, jerry DeLisle wrote:
>> It should be easy to implement:
>>
>> After the switch between F and E editing, we just need to shift the
>> decimal point and decrement the exponent. No new rounding is required,
>> because we keep the number of significant digits.
>>
>
> OK,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 14:41, jerry DeLisle wrote:
> This was established as solution to PR48488 where we had two choices for
> selecting the significant digits. Nine significant digits was established as
> a requirement to guarantee round trip in all cases. The char4_iunit_1.f03
> test case was
> I don't agree with this; with the patch we now output 10 significant
> digits, whereas 9 is sufficient for a binary->ascii->binary roundtrip.
> So please retain the "reduce d by one when E editing is used" thing
> for list format and G0. This is just a side effect of using 1PGw.d
> format for lis
