On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:29:34AM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > - should __array_size (b) be an integer constant (size_t)2, or should it
> > be non-constant (size_t)2 because the argument is a VLA (albeit a VLA
> > whose top-level dimension is an integer constant expressi
ntroduced when fixing this, I would rather just get it right.
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > If I use __array_size in an enumeration, this works fine, rather than
> > giving me "error: enumerator value for ‘foo’ is not an integer constant".
> > I am n
ot; I do get the expected warning, so I think that
covers this case. Is this right?
If I use __array_size in an enumeration, this works fine, rather than
giving me "error: enumerator value for ‘foo’ is not an integer constant".
I am not sure if this is not also a valid test.
--
Many thanks,
Stuart Brady
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:51:43PM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:05:36PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:16:49AM +0000, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > > For a hypothetical change to the C standard itself, I think one might
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:11:54PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Stuart Brady wrote:
>
> > So in other words, adapting all of the sizeof tests would be appropriate,
> > and sizeof tests for non-array types would change from expected passes to
> > expe
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:05:36PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:16:49AM +0000, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > I will look into submitting a PR for this properly soon, but will not
> > mind if someone wants to take this task upon themselves instead,
> >
matter of dealing with this for C++, Objective C and also
Objective C++, but I'd very much prefer to deal with C first, as that
seems the most straightforward, as is fundamental to the others.
--
Thanks,
Stuart Brady
If anyone could help guide me through
this process I would be very grateful. My patch, if deemed desirable, may
be large enough to require copyright assignment, in which case I would
very much appreciate some help in dealing with this.
--
Stuart Brady
[0] My own blog post with the macro that I
