Re: libiberty: Would it be reasonable to add support for GnuCOBOL function name demangling?

2022-05-28 Thread Simon Sobisch via Gcc-patches
Am 27.05.22 um 20:31 schrieb Eric Gallager: On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:17 AM Simon Sobisch via Gcc-patches wrote: [...] the first question is: is it reasonable to add support for GnuCOBOL? * How would the demangler know it is to be called? Just "best match" (GnuCOBOL modules always

libiberty: Would it be reasonable to add support for GnuCOBOL function name demangling?

2022-05-27 Thread Simon Sobisch via Gcc-patches
Hi fellow hackers, first of all: I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list for this question, but I did not found a separate one and gnu.org/software/libiberty redirects to https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libiberty.pdf - so I'm here. If there's a better place for this: please drop a not