Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
> Removes references to CC_STATUS_INIT from the avr port, which should get
> it to the point of building again.
>
>
> Committed to the trunk.
Thanks, I was about to send a patch for that.
Regards
Senthil
>
>
> Jeff
mentioned in the base patch
submission.
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Applies cleanly on rebased version of previous patch
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568658.html).
>
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> On 4/28/21 7:59 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>>> OK for trunk.
>>>
>>> Anything else that keeps us from merging the changes? Would be great to
>>> have the last backend besides CR-16 finally converted to M
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi Senthil!
>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:20 AM Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.
Applies cleanly on rebased version of previous patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568658.html).
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch, to be applied on top of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.html,
> adjus
Hi,
This patch, to be applied on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.html,
adjusts peepholes to match and generate parallels with a clobber of
REG_CC.
It also sets mov_insn as the name of the pattern for the split
insn (rather than the define_insn_and_split), so t
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>
>>
>> Finally, some general remarks:
>
> The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed
> whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of
> case #2), an
sted on
x86_64-linux.
>
> BTW, just to check: is your email address in MAINTAINERS still correct?
It was out-of-date, yes - updated now.
Regards
Senthil
2020-08-13 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
gcc/ChangeLog:
* emit-rtl.c (try_split): Call copy_frame_info_to_split_ins
This patch updates my email address in the MAINTAINERS file
2020-08-12 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* MAINTAINERS: Update my email address.
diff --git MAINTAINERS MAINTAINERS
index 0b825c7ea6d..217ec9c9eca 100644
--- MAINTAINERS
+++ MAINTAINERS
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ Stefan Schulze
Jeff Law writes:
> On 08/06/2018 04:53 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Ping!
>>
>> Regards
>> Senthil
>>
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The below patch fixes an ICE for the avr target w
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> The below patch fixes an ICE for the avr target when the setmemhi
> expander is involved.
>
> The setmemhi expander generated RTL ends up as an unrecognized insn
> if the alignment of the destination exceed
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> The below patch fixes a miscompilation of function calls with__memx address
> space
> arguments.
>
> For code like
>
> extern const __memx float a;
> extern const float b;
>
> int diff () { return a > b; }
>
> when c
with clobbered regs and substitutes pseudos
in their place.
The patch also adds a testcase to verify a is actually read. Reg testing
passed. Ok to commit to trunk?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-07-25 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* config/avr/avr-protos.h (avr_emit2_fix_outputs): New prot
also adds a testcase.
Regression test showed no new failures, ok to commit to trunk?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-07-18 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
PR target/85624
* config/avr/avr.md (*clrmemqi): Change mode of operands[2]
from QI to HI.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
to (16 bit) int size.
Fixed by marking the test as unsupported for targets with ptr size <
32. Committed as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/
2017-05-23 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-snprintf-warn-3.c: Require ptr32plus.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tre
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2017-05-17 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr78886.c: Use __SIZE_TYPE__ instead of
unsigned long.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr78886.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tre
hil
gcc/testsuite/
2017-05-09 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-13.c: Use __INT32_TYPE__ for
for targets with __SIZEOF_INT__ < 4.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-13.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-13.c
index f3fe8b51468..904e6dc075b 100
in a couple of FAILs.
The patch fixes that by typedef'ing __SIZE_TYPE__ to size_t and
using size_t as the type for memcpy's third parameter.
Committed to trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2017-05-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/pr78
-04-25 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-10.c: Ignore overflow warnings
for targets with int size less than 32 bits.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-10.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2017-04-19 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/pr80170.c: Require ptr32plus.
Index: gcc.dg/pr80170.c
===
--- gcc.dg/pr80170.c(revision 247010)
+++ gcc.dg/pr80170.c(working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6
onversion" of the unsigned short to signed int doesn't occur, and
this causes the test to fail.
Committed as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
2017-04-19 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/torture/pr80341.c: Require int32plus.
Index: g
est appears to assume all
non lp64 targets to be ilp32. For the avr, pointer size and int size
are equal, but both are 16 bits, not 32. The patch fixes this by
explicitly adding avr to the dejagnu selector.
Ok for trunk?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-04-06 Senthil Ku
Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr79121.c:Use __{U}INT32_TYPE__ for targets
with sizeof(int) < 4.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr79737-1.c (struct S): Likewise.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr79737-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr79777.c: Likew
Hi,
The test assumes 32 bit ints, and expects a constant in the
dump that is only valid for 32 bit ints. This trivial patch
fixes that by explicitly specifying __UINT32_TYPE__ as the type.
Committed as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2017-03-21 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-11-29 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* testsuite/gcc.dg/pr31096-1.c: Use __{U,}INT32_TYPE__ for
targets with sizeof(int) < 4.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/
int32_t everywhere.
Regards
Senthil
2016-11-25 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/pr64277.c: Use 32 bit int for targets
with sizeof(int) < 4.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64277.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.d
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've been analyzing a failing regtest (gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c) for the avr
>> > tar
Hi,
I've been analyzing a failing regtest (gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c) for the avr
target. I found that the (dump) failure is because there are 4
instances of memcpy, while the testcase expects only 2 for a
non-strict align target like the avr.
Comparing that with a dump generated by x64_64-p
Jeff Law writes:
> On 11/23/2016 02:54 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The below patch fixes uninit-19.c for avr by adding
>> -finline-small-functions for avr.
>>
>> The test fails for avr because fn1 does not get inlined into fn2. Inli
, and b[3] = p10[a] results in
a bigger size for fn1, resulting in estimate_growth > 0 and no inlining.
Adding -finline-small-functions forces early inliner to inline fn1,
making the test pass.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-11-23 Senthil Kumar
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 04.11.2016 06:18, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>> State of matters is that Binutils support is missing, and if I understand
>>> you
>>> correctly, dg-require is not appropriate to fa
g when the logical operands are of type short and int.
This isn't true for the avr - shorts and ints are of the same size, and
therefore the warning triggers for the above case also.
Committed to trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-11-16 Senthil
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 28.10.2016 17:58, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Now imagine some arithmetic like &&LAB2 - &&LAB1. This might result in
>>> one or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a
>>> complete differe
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-11-03 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/store_merging_1.c: Require store_merge.
* gcc.dg/store_merging_2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/store_merging_4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/store_merging_5.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/store_merging_6.c: Lik
Hi,
The below patch requires int32plus for
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78170.c, as it has int bitfields that are more
than 16 bits wide.
Committed to trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-11-03 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78170.c
Hi,
gcc.dg/lto/pr60449_0.c fails to link for the avr target because it
doesn't have an implementation for gettimeofday. This patch therefore
skips the test for avr.
Committed to trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-10-31 Senthil Kumar Sel
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 10/18/2016 02:15 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Will do both the changes and re-run the reg tests. Ok for trunk if the
>> tests pass for x86_64-pc-linux and avr?
>>
> Probably but let's see the patch first.
How does this look?
Boots
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 10/13/2016 08:57 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> 2016-10-13 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
>>
>> * reload.c (find_valid_class_1): Allow regclass if atleast one
>> regno in class is ok. Compute and use rclass size based on
s like the avr
for which the effective target condition is true, and this leaves
torture-options set, which causes the errors and differing options.
The below patch makes the return occur earlier - before calling the
init functions.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
2016-10-18 Sen
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:46:29PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> > I'm not convinced it is desirable to backport such changes, it affects ABI,
>> > people are used to deal with minor ABI changes in between major GCC
>> > rele
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Bernd Schmidt writes:
>
>> On 09/16/2016 09:02 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>> Does this make sense? I ran a reg test for the avr target with a
>>> slightly older version of this patch, it did not
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Richard Biener writes:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The fix for PR 52085 went into trunk when trunk was 6.0. I ran into the
>> same issue on a gcc 5.x and found that the fix didn't get backported.
>&g
10-17 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Backport from mainline
2015-04-25 Marek Polacek
PR c/52085
* c-decl.c (finish_enum): Copy over TYPE_ALIGN. Also check for "mode"
attribute.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-10-17 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Backpor
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 09/16/2016 09:02 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Does this make sense? I ran a reg test for the avr target with a
>> slightly older version of this patch, it did not show any regressions.
>> If this is the right fix, I'll make sure
reg testing with avr and x86_64-pc-linux
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-10-11 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr59597.c: Typedef __INT32_TYPE__ to i32.
(main): Declare j as i32 instead of int.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr5959
/ChangeLog
2016-10-05 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/torture/pr69941.c: Use __INT32_TYPE__ instead
of int if __SIZEOF_INT__ is less than 4 bytes.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69941.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite
consistently at compile, as expected.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-03 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.target/avr/torture/builtins-error.c: Add -ffat-lto-objects
option.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/avr/torture/builtins-error.c
James Greenhalgh writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch requires int32plus for
>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
>> failures for a 16 bit int tar
unexpected warnings.
Comitted to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
2016-09-27 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c: Require int32plus.
PR fortran/77666
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprint
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> The below patch fixes what I think are a couple of problems with
> reload.c:find_valid_class_1.
>
> First, even if no regno is in_hard_reg_set_p, it goes ahead and
> considers rclass as valid. bad is s
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is it ok to backport PR 65210 to gcc-5-branch? The patch is already in
> 6.x and trunk.
>
> Regards
> Senthil
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> 2016-09-22 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
>
> Backport
Hi,
Is it ok to backport PR 65210 to gcc-5-branch? The patch is already in
6.x and trunk.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-09-22 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Backport from trunk r227496
PR target/65210
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_eval_addr_attrib): Look for io_low
aling
SImode costs by 2 for DImode muls.
With both changes in, there are no regressions, and the
builtin-arith-overflow-* tests now PASS and don't timeout.
Ok to commit to trunk and backport to 5.x?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-21 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* config
nthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr64130.c: Use __UINT32_TYPE__ instead of int.
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr64130.c
===
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr64130.c (revision 240299)
+++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr64130.c (revision 240300)
@@
Hi,
The below patch fixes what I think are a couple of problems with
reload.c:find_valid_class_1.
First, even if no regno is in_hard_reg_set_p, it goes ahead and
considers rclass as valid. bad is set only if a regno is in the reg
class *and* HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK is false - if both are fal
Hi,
This patch fixes a bogus testsuite failure for the avr target. The
test has integer literals that only fit on targets with int size >= 32.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-09-16 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/torture/pr70421.c: Requ
Hi,
The below patch adds avr to the list of targets excluded for
Wno-frame-address.c. Like the other excluded targets, the avr backend
only supports the builtin for the current stack frame.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-09-06 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
-01 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/pr64252.c: Require int32plus.
* gcc.dg/pr66299-1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/pr66299-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/torture/20131115-1.c: Skip for avr.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64252.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-08-24 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71083.c: Use UINT32_TYPE instead
of unsigned int.
* gcc.dg/zero_sign_ext_test.c: Require int32plus.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71083.c
Jeff Law writes:
> On 08/11/2016 01:40 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The below patch adds the AVR target to the list of targets that don't
>> have natural_alignment_32. It also skips ipa/propalign-*.c
>> tests (w
ommit?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-11 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/ipa/propalign-1.c: Skip for targets with !natural_alignment_32
and !natural_alignment_64.
* gcc.dg/ipa/propalign-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/ipa/propalign-3.c: Lik
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 08/08/2016 05:26 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
>> I picked out the commit where you'd added SYMBOL_REF handling (rev
>> #190252), and patched that with the below code. Bootstrapped and
>> regtested on x86_64-pc-linux - the re
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 07/28/2016 09:33 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason why only REG and SYMBOL_REFs get valid
>> subreg_in_class? I tried extending it handle constants and PLUS
>> expressions, and it fixes PR 71873. It also fixes a
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 08.08.2016 10:24, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This doc patch informs the user that a specific (or higher) version of
>> binutils is a prerequisite for the fix for a rather vexing bug (PR
>> 71151) that was fixed
Hi,
This doc patch informs the user that a specific (or higher) version of
binutils is a prerequisite for the fix for a rather vexing bug (PR
71151) that was fixed for 6.2.
I've added it to the Caveats section; is there a better place? If not, ok to
commit?
Regards
Senthil
Index: chan
Hi,
Committed below patch to trunk as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
2016-08-03 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/init-excess-2.c: Require int32plus.
* gcc.dg/pr44024.c: Skip if target keeps null pointer checks.
* gcc.dg/pr59963-2.c: Require int32plus.
* gcc.dg
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 02.08.2016 06:50, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> Denis Chertykov writes:
>>
>>> 2016-08-01 15:17 GMT+03:00 Georg-Johann Lay :
>>>> Problem with -fcaller-saves is that there are situations where it triggers
>>>&
Denis Chertykov writes:
> 2016-08-01 15:17 GMT+03:00 Georg-Johann Lay :
>> Problem with -fcaller-saves is that there are situations where it triggers
>> an expensive frame just to store a variable around a function call even
>> though there are plenty of call-saved registers.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>>
Hi,
When analyzing PR 71873 (ICE in push_reload), I found that that code
in push_reload that recursively calls push_reload for subreg
expressions doesn't correctly set subreg_in_class for a few cases.
Specifically, reload_inner_reg_of_subreg returns true if SUBREG_REG(x)
is CONSTANT_P o
Mike Stump writes:
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
>>
>> The below patch fixes tests that fail for the avr target, because they
>> assume ints are atleast 32 bits wide and pointers and longs have the
>> same size.
>>
>
he pointer <-> int size
difference warning.
Reg tested on avr and x86_64 with no regressions. Committed as
obvious.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-07-25 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/torture/pr69352.c (foo): Cast to intptr_t instead of long.
* gcc.dg/t
Hi,
The patch fixes a couple of testsuite failures that show up for the
avr target because it has different sizes for longs and pointers (4
bytes versus 2), by explicitly disabling the warning for avr.
Does this make sense? Skipping the test by requiring ptr32plus would
have worked, but
Hi,
The below patch conditionally defines Int32 and UInt32 to accomodate
targets with sizeof(int) != 4.
Regtested with x86_64 and avr. Committed as obvious.
Regards
Senthil
2016-07-19 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/params/blocksort-part.c: Conditionally define Int32
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> This patch contains some unrelated tweaks
>
> - Supplying no-ldregs variant for andqi3, iorqi3 where a const_int mask
> affects
> only 1 bit
>
> - Some patterns that match situations with zero_extend that can be performed
> with less instructions / register pressure.
Hi,
This patch requires int32plus and ptr32plus for a couple of tests,
tweaks Wduplicated-cond-3.c to use a smaller constant that fits in
16 bits, and marks one test as too big
for avr.
Committed to trunk.
Regards
Senthil
2016-07-13 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* c-c++-common
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes a problem with fmerge-all-constants and the progmem
> attribute - on trunk, the below testcase errors out with a section
> conflict error.
>
> When avr_asm_select_section renames .rodata.xyz section to
>
e set by switch_section anyway.
Reg testing showed no new regressions. Ok for trunk and backport to 6.x?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-05 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
PR target/50739
* gcc.target/avr/pr50739.c: New test.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-05 Senthil
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 22.06.2016 19:06, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Some tests for PR71151 assume that the target MCU has a 3-byte PC. The
>>> tests are failing because the simulator (avrtest) rejects to load the
>>> respective execut
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>>
>>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>>
>>>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> [set JUMP_TABL
Hi,
This patch fixes some bogus failures for the avr target by requiring
int32plus or ptr32plus support.
Ok for trunk?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-06-20 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* c-c++-common/pr68657-1.c: Require ptr32plus support.
* c-c++-common
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>
>> As described in the
Added myself to MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval).
Regards
Senthil
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 237571)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-06-18 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
+
+ * MAINTAINERS
Denis Chertykov writes:
> 2016-06-16 10:27 GMT+03:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> :
>>
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>>
>>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>>
>>>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>>>&g
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_T
? I don't have commit access.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-06-08 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.c-torture/execute/bswap-2.c: Require int32plus.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr68067-1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr68067-2.c: Likewise.
diff --git gcc/test
x for making gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c pass again for avr.
If this is ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit
access.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-06-08 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c (SIZE): Consider return address
when setting S
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>
>> As described in the
that
some more.
If ok, could someone commit please? Could you also backport to
gcc-6-branch?
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-06-03 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_asm_function_rodata_section): Remove.
* config/avr/avr.c (TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SE
don't have commit access.
Regards
Senthil
2016-05-25 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* c-c++-common/Wduplicated-cond-1.c: Use smaller const literal.
* c-c++-common/pr60226.c: Require int32plus.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr70602.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/Warray-bounds
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> This trivial patch adds INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET to
> current_function_static_stack_size, thus fixing the 2 (or 3, for
> 3 byte PC devices) byte difference between reported and actual
> values when u
when setting
current_function_static_stack_size.
If this is ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit
access.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-05-13 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_expand_prologue): Add INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET
to com
Joern Wolfgang Rennecke writes:
> On 28/04/16 07:57, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>> diff --git libcilkrts/ChangeLog libcilkrts/ChangeLog
>> index 8fada8a..ed26a3a 100644
>> --- libcilkrts/ChangeLog
>> +++ libcilkrts/ChangeLog
>> @@ -1,9 +1,3 @@
>> -20
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 04/15/2016 02:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> For both testcases in the PR, reload fails to take into account that
>> FP-SP elimination can no longer be performed, and tries to find reload
>> regs for an rtx generated when
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Bernd Schmidt writes:
>
>> On 04/07/2016 01:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>>The below patch fixes PR 60040 by not halting with a hard error on
>>>a spill failure, if reload knows that it has t
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 04/07/2016 01:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>The below patch fixes PR 60040 by not halting with a hard error on
>>a spill failure, if reload knows that it has to run again anyway.
>
> Some additional information as to how this situ
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch add dg-require-effective-target directives to a few tests
> that were failing unnecessarily for the AVR target.
>
> One of them invokes the compiler with -fschedule-insns2 - I've
> requi
sions.
If ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit access.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-04-07 Joern Rennecke
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
PR target/60040
* reload1.c (find_reload_regs): Add tentative parameter.
and don't report s
lus - they either use bit shifts wider than
16 bits (AVR's int size), or use int constants that are too big
for a 16 bit int.
If ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit access.
Regards
Senthil
2016-04-04 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr69102.c
ite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20151204.c
>> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Array too big" { "avr-*-*" } { "*" } { "" } } */
>
> just one nit: please omit the default args to dg-skip-if, they are
> unnecessary.
>
Done.
gcc/testsuite/
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
