On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:15:02PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:58:53AM -0400, S. Gilles wrote:
>
> Thanks for tackling this.
>
> > @@ -6858,6 +6858,9 @@
> > /* 1 if this constructor is erroneous so far. */
> > static int constructor
test case. If
this is approved, could someone commit it for me, as I do not have
access?
S. Gilles
2014-06-01 S. Gilles
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/53119
c/
* c-typeck.c (push_init_level, process_init_element,
pop_init_level): Correct check for zero initialization, move