Richard Sandiford wrote:
>On reflection, I think it'd be better if I stood down as an rtl
>maintainer.
>I'll still try to keep the MIPS stuff ticking over though.
>
>Applied as obvious.
You might consider instead denoting yourself to reviewer status. We do not
have too many people reviewing rt
Steven Bosscher wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>> Richi, could you please have a look at jump threading, and see if
>>> first_pass_instance can be remove?
>
>Ping? :-)
>
>
>>> Bootstrapped&tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
>>
>> This was propos
Steven Bosscher wrote:
>Hello,
>
>IMHO, no RTL pass implementation file should have to include tree.h.
>So ira-conflicts.c shouldn't need tree.h. The reason it needed it, was
>because there is code to avoid putting user variables in callee
>clobbered registers, and ira-conflict.c looked at DECL_A