On 7 February 2017 at 13:40, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 4 January 2017 at 16:02, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Prasad Ghangal
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>
On 4 January 2017 at 16:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The attached patch tries fix ICE due to undeclared variable(s) in the input.
>> Successfully bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, testing is in progress
Sorry for the wrong email address.
On 28 December 2016 at 23:57, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch tries fix ICE due to undeclared variable(s) in the input.
> Successfully bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, testing is in progress
>
>
> Thanks,
> Prasad
Hi,
The attached patch tries fix ICE due to undeclared variable(s) in the input.
Successfully bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, testing is in progress
Thanks,
Prasad
Changelog
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c b/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
index b7cef93..13bf2b1 100644
--
On 25 October 2016 at 15:49, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>>
>>> >> Thanks for your feedback. I had missed removing some unwanted code
>>> >> while code clean
Hi all,
I don't know if this is the right time to submit such patches.
But this patch attempts to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566
I have successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
testcases:
file:
-Wall
test.c:
void foo()
{
int a,b;
a = b + 1;
}
@t
On 14 September 2016 at 18:54, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 26 August 2016 at 14:28, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 24 A
On 26 August 2016 at 14:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad Ghangal
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 22 August
On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>&
On 23 August 2016 at 21:15, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> On 23 August 2016 at 02:56, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>>> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at
On 23 August 2016 at 02:56, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> > @@
On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following tasks:
>>
>> * Parsed gimple-expression
>> * Parsed gimp
Hi all,
As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following tasks:
* Parsed gimple-expression
* Parsed gimple-labels
* Parsed local declaration
* Parsed gimple-goto statement
* Parsed gimple-if-else statement
* Parsed gimple-switch statement
* Parsed gimple-return statement
* Parsed gimp
On 11 April 2016 at 20:09, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> This is proposed patch for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48116 (-Wreturn-type does
> not work as advertised)
>
> Currently gcc doesn't give any warning with -Wreturn-type or -Wall
> optio
linux.
Thanks,
Prasad Ghangal
Index: gcc/c/ChangeLog
===
diff --git a/trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog b/trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
--- a/trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog (revision 234872)
+++ b/trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-04-11 P
Thank you David for your response. I will keep all that in mind from next patch.
On 21 February 2016 at 03:37, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 19:05 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This is my first proposed patch for
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
PING
Sorry I didn't include [Fix PR c/17896] in prev mail
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02361.html
On 30 January 2016 at 19:05, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is my first proposed patch for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17896. I was w
E) == tcc_comparison"
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prasad Ghangal
Index: gcc/c-family/c-common.c
===
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c (revision 232768)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c (working copy)
@@ -11596,6 +11596,11 @@
|| code_right =
18 matches
Mail list logo
