>From 62ab7123e73563b43f1833842a419aa66eca7ce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max T Woodbury
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:58:49 -0400
Copyright 2017 Max TenEyck Woodbury, Durham North Carolina
all rights assigned to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 23 Oct 2017
The Problem:
There is a proble
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Postpone __LINE__ evaluation to the end of #line
directives
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:32:41 -0500
From: Max Woodbury
To: Joseph S. Myers
On 11/28/2013 11:34 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Max Woodbury wrote:
There
On 11/27/2013 04:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On further consideration, I'm not convinced there's a bug here at all; I
don't think it's sufficiently defined in the standard what the current
token is for the purposes of line numbering when __LINE__ gets expanded to
be able to say that one or the
On 11/27/2013 05:46 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at
05:29:22AM -0500, mtewoodb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
>
> This patch is badly missing a description. You also want to mention
> the PR number, if this fixes a bug. I guess this is to fix PR58687.
>
I
From 6c95593f684c120a0ea7ef6178401283f63250b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max TenEyck Woodbury
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:48:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Postpone __LINE__ evaluation to the end of #line directives
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Copyright 2013 assigned to the Free Software Foundation
