I am writing this follow-up email to specify that I executed the tests
contained in this patch on aarch64-arm64-linux-gnu
Best regards,
Matteo
> On Sep 9, 2025, at 10:39 PM, Matteo Nicoli wrote:
>
> Dear reviewers,
>
> I attached the patch for this Bugzilla issue:
> h
Dear reviewers,I attached the patch for this Bugzilla issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117760I also attached an SMT file for the formal verifications of these properties. At the bottom of the file I pasted its output (executed with Z3).Best regards,Matteo
117760.smt2
Description
com> wrote:On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:15 PM Matteo Nicoli <matteo.nicoli...@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Richard,No, I don’t have access to gcc git. Anyway, I updated the patch description and attached here the new patch.Please always state how you tested a patch. This one doesn't compile beca
Dear Richard,No, I don’t have access to gcc git. Anyway, I updated the patch description and attached here the new patch.Best regards,Matteo
tree-optimization-121595.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sep 2, 2025, at 1:57 PM, Richard Biener wrote:On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:20 PM Matteo Nicoli
Here’s the patch with the modified comment before the rule in match.pd
tree-optimization-121595.patch
Description: Binary data
> On Aug 29, 2025, at 12:53 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 10:56 AM Matteo Nicoli
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Rich
28, 2025, at 10:43 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 11:56 PM Matteo Nicoli
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear reviewers,
>>
>> I attached a patch for bug 121595
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121595). I signed it, and
>&
Dear reviewers,I attached a patch for bug 121595 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121595). I signed it, and added `Reviewed-by: Andrew Pinski ` (here in CC).Best regards,Matteo
tree-optimization-121595.patch
Description: Binary data