In gcc-5/changes.html the section about __has_include and __has_include_next
says:
The header search paths for __has_include_next and __has_include_next are
equivalent to those of the standard directive #include and the extension
#include_next respectively.
I think the first __has_include_next
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:28:37PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> Committed as obvious.
>
>* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (cond_arg_set_in_bb): Remove unused
> debugging argument.
Could you please remove the third argument in the calls to cond_arg_set_in_bb
as well?
/MF
> Index: tree-ssa-
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 14:59 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This patch adds some typedef printers to libstdc++.
>
> This relies on a gdb patch that hasn't yet gone in (pending on the list).
> If the gdb patch changes, I'll change these printers as well.
>
> The basic idea is that you can now have gdb
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:55:51AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Richi, this implements your idea for fixing PR 54281. I don't
> have an old enough compiler. Could you please test it in your
> system?
>
> I debated whether to remove the GENERATOR_FILE predicate from the
> inclusion (some files i
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> >
Hello.
Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have failed.
I am building with local copies of all the libraries, so I have added
gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl and cloog from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure
to my source directory.
The command sequence I use is
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 15:17 -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 6/25/12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > [ Added doc maintainers in CC ]
> > >
> I have added a bit more in the rationale, reached through the link
> at the end of that section.
>
> > > > +
>
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 16:50 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 04:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 04/13/2012 04:20 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> >>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 5:30 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> > no warning from trun
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> >Could someone please review this?
>
> + if (cxx_dialect < cxx0x && !in_system_header)
> + pedwarn (input_location, OPT_pedantic,
> + "comma at end of enumerator list");
>
> Why not use maybe_warn_cpp0
Could someone please review this?
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 16:27 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As I understand it C++-11 allows trailing commas in enum definitions.
> Thus I think the following little patch should be included.
>
> /MF
2011-10-09 Magnus Fromreide
Hi.
As I understand it C++11 allows trailing commas in enum definitions.
Thus I think the following little patch should be included.
On a side note I have to say that the effects of pedwarn_cxx98 are
unexpected, especially in light of the comment above the function body.
/MF
2011-10-09 Magnus
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 00:48 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi!
>
> over the last 2 days or so, Daniel Krugler - having filed in due course
> his Copyright Assignment - finally kindly contributed to the project
> shiny new std::is_constructible, std::is_default_constructible and
> std::is_destruc
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 09:21 +0100, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> On Apr 8 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> >
> >It adds a new option -fstack-arrays which makes the frontend put
> >all local arrays on stack memory. ...
>
> Excellent!
>
> >I haven't rechecked performance now, but four months ago this was the
13 matches
Mail list logo
