Hi,
update of std module is missing.
Regards,
Maciej
Hi,
unless I missed it, updates of std and std.compat modules are missing.
Regards,
Maciej
Hi,
two issues:
1) #include is missing in std.compat.cc.in
2) does the updated std.compat module actually work? When I experimented
with implementing the std module in gcc, I couldn't #include standard
headers, after they were imported via std module (since GMF merging isn't
implemented yet), i.
idden friends.
Another thing - P2465r3 mentions only lerp, byte and related ops as
special w.r.t skipping export from global namespace in std.compat, but
for some reason Microsoft's impl treats 3-arg hypot as special as
well.
Regards,
Maciej Cencora
timized out.
I guess the best option would be to introduce in C++ language a new
compiler-backed type trait like:
std::zero_initialized_object_has_all_zeros_object_representation.
Regards,
Maciej
pt., 28 cze 2024 o 00:25 Jonathan Wakely napisał(a):
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 14:27, Maciej Cen
I think going the bit_cast way would be the best because it enables the
optimization for many more classes including common wrappers like optional,
variant, pair, tuple and std::array.
Regards,
Maciej Cencora
czw., 27 cze 2024 o 14:57 Maciej Cencora napisał(a):
> You could include some of
han Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 13:40, Maciej Cencora wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > not sure whether I've missed some conditional that would exclude this
> case, but your change seems to incorrectly handle trivial ty
Hi,
not sure whether I've missed some conditional that would exclude this case,
but your change seems to incorrectly handle trivial types that have a
non-zero bit pattern of value-initialized object, e.g. pointer to member.
Regards,
Maciej Cencora
Hi,
instead of uglyfing all the libstdc++ code wouldn't it be simpler to
just ignore all non-reserved macro expansions (+ some special ones
like assert) inside system headers on compiler level?
Regards,
Maciej
Hi,
you can emulate C++17 inline variables in C++11 with either of the two ways:
1) via a template helper
template
struct Helper
{
static constexpr unsigned value[4] = {1, 2, 3, 4};
};
template
constexpr unsigned Helper::value[4];
static constexpr auto& arr = Helper<>::value;
2) extern c
Hi,
variant getter can be implemented in C++17 without using "recursive"
calls, but by generating a list of member pointers and applying them
with fold expression. Here's an example:
https://godbolt.org/z/3vcKjWjPG
Regards,
Maciej
11 matches
Mail list logo