[PATCH v2] powerpc: Remove LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC{32, 64} from --with-advance-toolchain

2021-11-10 Thread Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Gcc-patches
Historically this was added to fill gaps from ld.so.cache on early AT releases. This now are just causing errors and rework. Since AT5.0 the AT's ld.so is using a correctly configured ld.so.cache and sets the DT_INTERP to AT's ld.so. This two factors are sufficient for an AT builded program to get

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC{32, 64} from --with-advance-toolchain

2021-11-09 Thread Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Gcc-patches
Quoting Segher Boessenkool (2021-11-09 11:19:58) > Hi! > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:39:46AM -0300, Lucas A. M. Magalhaes wrote: > > Ping. > > I did not get the original, and neither did the archives? > Strange, it's on the archives. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582643

[PATCH] powerpc: Remove LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC{32, 64} from --with-advance-toolchain

2021-11-09 Thread Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Gcc-patches
Ping. -- >8 -- Historically this was added to fill gaps from ld.so.cache on early AT releases. This now are just causing errors and rework. Since AT5.0 the AT's ld.so is using a correctly configured ld.so.cache and sets the DT_INTERP to AT's ld.so. This two factors are sufficient for an AT builde

[PATCH] powerpc: Remove LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC{32, 64} from --with-advance-toolchain

2021-10-26 Thread Lucas A. M. Magalhaes via Gcc-patches
Historically this was added to fill gaps from ld.so.cache on early AT releases. This now are just causing errors and rework. Since AT5.0 the AT's ld.so is using a correctly configured ld.so.cache and sets the DT_INTERP to AT's ld.so. This two factors are sufficient for an AT builded program to get