Re: [PATCH] PR preprocessor/42014

2014-10-20 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
2014-10-20 16:11 GMT+02:00 Manuel López-Ibáñez : >> 2014-10-18 23:07 GMT+02:00 Krzesimir Nowak : >>> Hello. >>> >>> This is my first patch for GCC. I already started a paperwork for >>> copyright assignment (sent an email to fsf-records at gnu org) - &

Re: [PATCH] PR preprocessor/42014

2014-10-20 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
2014-10-18 23:07 GMT+02:00 Krzesimir Nowak : > Hello. > > This is my first patch for GCC. I already started a paperwork for > copyright assignment (sent an email to fsf-records at gnu org) - > waiting for response. > > So, about this patch - it basically removes column pri

[PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/42014

2014-10-18 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
gcc/Changelog: 2014-10-18 Krzesimir Nowak * diagnostic.c (diagnostic_report_from): New function. It prints one line from include chain. (diagnostic_report_current_module): Use the above function. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2014-10-18 Krzesimir Nowak * c-c++-common/cpp/pr42014.c: New. * c

[PATCH] PR preprocessor/42014

2014-10-18 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
heck for both vanilla and changed GCC to compare the results? These tests take ages to complete, so maybe there is some subset of tests which is enough for regression checking in this case? Currently I am only running following command in gcc directory: make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="-v dg.exp=