Re: [PING^2][PATCH] Fix documentation of -mpoke-function-name ARM option

2020-03-22 Thread Jérémy Lefaure
Hi Wilco, On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:53:41PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > There is no single PC offset that is correct given CPUs may use different > offsets. Isn't it always an offset of 8 in ARM mode and 4 bytes in Thumb mode ? At least in ARMv7 and in AArch32 state in ARMv8 ? > G

[PING^2][PATCH] Fix documentation of -mpoke-function-name ARM option

2020-02-20 Thread Jérémy Lefaure
Hello, Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01081.html. Thank you, Jérémy On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Jérémy Lefaure wrote: > Hi! > > Since in ARM state the value of PC is the address of the current > instruction plus 8 bytes, the code inspecting the

[PING][PATCH] Fix documentation of -mpoke-function-name ARM option

2020-01-10 Thread Jérémy Lefaure
Hello, Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01081.html. Thank you, Jérémy On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Jérémy Lefaure wrote: > Hi! > > Since in ARM state the value of PC is the address of the current > instruction plus 8 bytes, the code inspecting the

[PATCH] Fix documentation of -mpoke-function-name ARM option

2019-12-15 Thread Jérémy Lefaure
-12-14 Jérémy Lefaure * config/arm/arm.c (-mpoke-function-name): Fix documentation in comment. * doc/invoke.texi (-mpoke-function-name): Fix documentation. Index: gcc/config/arm/arm.c === --- gcc/config/arm/arm.c