something, -mSPB can be made to
imply -mno-PDITR as this is the typical usage for -mSPB.
So Nathan's patch should have been the other way around: -mSPB should
imply -mno-PDITR rather than -mno-PDITR implying -mSPB.
Thanks,
Irfan Ahmad
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Joey Ye wrote:
&g
x27;t see how the twain can
> meet. That can happen as a follow-up - the current patch is by itself a step
> improvement.
Please see the alternative perspective as described below.
Irfan Ahmad
[p.s. Sorry about repeat send. I accidentally sent it
ently of CODE segment.
From #2: Only one instance of GOT is required per dynamic object so
there is no need for a mechanism (-mSPB) that would enable switching GOTs.
So when both #1 and #2 are met, you only need
-mno-pic-data-is-text-relative.
Irfan Ahmad
