\\(DIE
\\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block 6
as expected.
Best regards,
Andrei Herman
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Israel branch
On 6/20/2014 12:09 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Herman, Andrei wrote:
+ /* The -fforce-dwarf-lexical-blocks option is only relevant when debug
I get back.
Thanks and regards,
Andrei Herman
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Israel branch
On 6/20/2014 12:09 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Herman, Andrei wrote:
+ /* The -fforce-dwarf-lexical-blocks option is only relevant when debug
+ info is in DWARF4 format */
Hi,
This is the third (and final) patch which extends the original change
proposal, submitted on June 1, and titled "Add
'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command line option".
This patch extends the proposed functionality to C++.
Attached are the proposed ChangeLog additions (for this patch only
Hi,
Currently GCC only emits DWARF debug information (DW_TAG_lexical_block
DIEs) for compound statements containing significant local declarations.
However, code coverage tools that process the DWARF debug information to
implement block/path coverage need more complete lexical block information
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:27 PM
> To: Herman, Andrei
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH GCC]Add 'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command line
> option
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:01 PM
> To: Herman, Andrei
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; herman_and...@mentor.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Add 'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command
Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 7:00 PM
> To: Herman, Andrei
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; herman_and...@mentor.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Add 'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command line
> option
>
> On May 7, 2014, at 2:32 AM, Herma
Thanks for the note.
I will make the needed changes and resubmit.
Regards,
Andrei Herman
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Israel branch
> -Original Message-
> From: pins...@gmail.com [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 12:37 PM
> To: Herman, Andrei
>
Hi,
Currently GCC only emits DWARF debug information (DW_TAG_lexical_block DIEs)
for compound statements containing significant local declarations.
However, code coverage tools that process the DWARF debug information to
implement block/path coverage need more complete lexical block information.
