On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/12/16 21:41 -0300, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>>
>> Good point. Do you want me to update the patch with __men or go your way
>> with the wrapper?
Hello Jonathan,
> I think my wrapper's too ugly :-
Hello Jonathan,
Sorry for the delay, I was in mid-vacation.
Comments are inline.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16/09/16 02:53 -0300, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> I've tried both approaches. Templates were causing proble
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for top-posting, but this is a ping for the attached patch.
>
> The patch doesn't seem to have been applied nor refused. So I'm
> pinging to see if I need to change something?
ict in the Changelog
file.
Regards,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another patch.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>&g
Hello,
Another patch.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>>
>> + || sizeof(uint32_t) == sizeof(void*)
>> +
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>
> + || sizeof(uint32_t) == sizeof(void*)
> +|| sizeof(uint16_t) == sizeof(void*),
>
> Indentation is off?
>
>> Call _M_extract
(and just include'ing
makes the final executable 100k bigger), however being able to use all
C++11 and C++14 goodies from the STL is already really great.
Kind regards,
--
Felipe Magno de Almeida
From 53952b274a4e4f4578bf4eb2332a7aa07b26a23b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida
