Re: Don't let search bots look at buglist.cgi

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:27:44PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Richard Guenther > wrote: > >>> > >>> httpd being in the top-10 always, fiddling with bugzilla URLs? > >>> (Note, I don't have access to gcc.gnu.org, I'm relaying info from multiple > >>> instances

addition to http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html

Hi, I propose to add a phrase to the "rpath"-section (Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries), which explains how to use "-R" as compiler-option (by using "-Wl,") Axel --- old/faq.html2011-04-17 13:55:36.0 +0200 +++ new/faq.html2011-04-17 14:00:28.0 +0200 @@ -244,

proposed patch -- remove superflous lines

Hi, as that's the first time I propose a patch for gcc: sorry for all formal mistakes (and please tell me what I should do differently ...) Those lines were introduced in svn:164531 (22. Sep. 2010), but in svn:166534 (10. Nov. 2010) the part which could change "argv_copied" was removed. As no-whe

Re: Implement stack arrays even for unknown sizes

Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:49:16PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > > > > I find that both nf.f90 and capacita.f90 segfault in runtime for any > > > stack size. > > > > On x86_64-apple-darwin10, nf.f90 "works". However if I run it throug