On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:33:38 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> This is almost ready to push to trunk, but there are a couple of extra
> tasks needed to be done:
Done.
Please find the attached v3 patch and let me know if something needs to
be changed/added.
Thanks!
Regards,
Avinash Sonawane (root
Apologies! Forgot to attach the patch v2.
Done now.
>From 1d986ffd8b20007a6a2140e50935ade1bebc2228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Avinash Sonawane
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:32:44 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: Document that taint analyzer checker disables some
warnings
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:15:02 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> So it would be even better if the text listed the warnings that are
> affected by this: basically all of the ones that are implemented in
> checkers i.e. analyzer/sm-*.cc (apart from sm-taint, of course).
Done! I could find 13 warnings in
Hello!
$ man gcc says that "Some checkers are disabled by default (even with
-fanalyzer), such as the "taint" checker that implements
-Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index, and this option is required to enable
them." but still lists the -Wanalyzer-tainted-* checkers under
-fanalyzer saying "Enabling thi
