2017-02-25 18:10 GMT+01:00 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>>> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>>> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
>>> 6.3" or "
2017-01-10 13:58 GMT+01:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> On 10 Jan 15:00, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-10 13:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> > wrote:
>> >> 2017-01-10 13:04 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
>>
2017-01-20 20:08 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi,
> On 20 Jan 14:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>
>> > here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it Ok?
>> >
>> > gcc/
2017-01-19 20:55 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> On 19 Jan 19:42, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-19 13:39 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> > On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>>
2017-01-19 13:39 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi Andrew,
> On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And
2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
>> > TID0: INS 0x004003ee AVX512VEX kmovd k0, eax
>> &
2017-01-17 15:30 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi Anrey,
> On 17 Jan 14:04, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mas
2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
>
> The software developer manuals describe KSHIFT{L,R}* like:
> KSHIFTLW
> COUNT <- imm8[7:0]
Hi,
here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
gcc/
* config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask registers shift intrinsics.
* config/i386/avx512dqintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def: Add new types.
*
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:37:14PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> As suggested in [1], you should write multi-line enums like:
>>
>> enum foo
>> {
>> a = ...
>> b = ...
>> }
>
> Sure. Plus it depends on if users of the APIs should just write the operands
> on their own as numbers, or as __SGX_E
2017-01-10 13:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2017-01-10 13:04 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
>>> Hi,
>>> In addition to Uroš's inputs:
>>>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/avx512vpopcntdqintrin.h
2017-01-10 13:04 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi,
> In addition to Uroš's inputs:
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/avx512vpopcntdqintrin.h
>> b/gcc/config/i386/avx512vpopcntdqintrin.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..28305f6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/avx512vpopcntdqintrin.h
>
2016-12-27 16:35 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> Hello!
>
>> this patch enables AVX512 VPOPCNTD/VPOPCNTQ instructions recently
>> added in Instruction Set Extensions
>> (https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf).
>
> @@
Hi,
this patch enables AVX512 VPOPCNTD/VPOPCNTQ instructions recently
added in Instruction Set Extensions
(https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf).
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c (OPTION_MASK_ISA_
2016-12-15 19:51 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-12-14 22:55 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> here is the second part
2016-12-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
. . . . .
>>
>> I split this patch after last updates in md files, here is the first
>> part which doesn't change md files.
>> Regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Is this part ok?
>
> There is no point to scan for kmovX insn in e.g.:
>
> +/* { dg-final { scan-as
2016-12-07 15:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>
>> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>
> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
> 6.3" or &qu
2016-10-14 12:23 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>&
2016-12-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>> 2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizj
2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>&g
2016-11-30 11:52 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 11/29/2016 12:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > > Balaji added this check explicitly. There should be tests in the
>> > > testsuite
>> > > (spawnee_inline, spawner_inline) which exercise that code.
>> >
>> >
2016-11-21 20:12 GMT+03:00 Martin Sebor :
> On 11/20/2016 11:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On x8
2016-11-19 13:17 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:30:06PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:41:01PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> > I'm seeing lots of ICEs with this.
>>>
>>> Here is untested fi
2016-11-16 19:21 GMT+03:00 Bernd Schmidt :
> On 11/15/2016 05:31 PM, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>
>> 2016-11-15 17:56 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
>>>
>>> On 11/15/2016 05:55 AM, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-11-11
Hi,
this is follow-up with tests for new __target__ attributes and
__builtin_cpu_supports update.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (processor_features): Add
F_AVX5124VNNIW, F_AVX5124FMAPS.
(isa_names_table): Handle new features.
libgcc/
* config/i386/cpuinfo.c (processor_
2016-11-15 17:56 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
> On 11/15/2016 05:55 AM, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>
>> 2016-11-11 14:16 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>>
>>> --- a/gcc/genmodes.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/genmodes.c
>>> --- a/gcc/init-regs.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/i
2016-11-11 14:16 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> --- a/gcc/genmodes.c
> +++ b/gcc/genmodes.c
> --- a/gcc/init-regs.c
> +++ b/gcc/init-regs.c
> --- a/gcc/machmode.h
> +++ b/gcc/machmode.h
>
> These are middle-end changes, you will need a separate review for these.
Who could review these changes?
--
WBR
2016-11-11 14:29 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed preexisting:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ VECT
2016-11-11 14:16 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> The x86 part of the patch is OK with the above changes and additional
> target attribute test for flags2 ISA features..
Fixed according your comments, I will followup with additional tests soon.
--
WBR,
Andrew
new_avx512_instructions_14.11.patch
Descr
2016-11-11 18:26 GMT+03:00 Marc Glisse :
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> +extern __inline __mmask32
>> +__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
>> +_kand_mask32 (__mmask32 __A, __mmask32 __B)
>> +{
>> + retu
2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>>> Some quick remarks:
>>>>
>>>
2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> Some quick remarks:
>
> +(define_insn "kmovb"
> + [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=k,k")
> + (unspec:QI
> + [(match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,km")]
> + UNSPEC_KMOV))]
> + "!(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1])) &&
2016-11-10 20:14 GMT+03:00 Vladimir N Makarov :
>
>
> On 11/10/2016 11:27 AM, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch enabled AVX512_4FMAPS and AVX512_4VNNIW instructions.
>>
>> It requires additional patch for register allocator fr
2016-11-10 19:36 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch enabled AVX512_4FMAPS and AVX512_4VNNIW instructions.
>>
>> It requires additional patch for register allocator from Vladimir
Hi,
this patch enabled AVX512_4FMAPS and AVX512_4VNNIW instructions.
It requires additional patch for register allocator from Vladimir
Makarov to be committed before.
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c
(OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX5124FMAPS_SET,
OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX5124FMAPS_U
> That said - why do we need to remove pcommit support on the branches at all?
I think it is better to have old branches updated because pcommit will
not be implemented in hardware.
--
WBR,
Andrew
2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
&g
2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>>> -mpcommit
>>>>&g
2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>>> -mpcommit
>>> -Target Report Mask(ISA_PCOMMIT) Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
>>> -Support PCOMMIT instruction.
>>> -
>>>
>>> Yo
> (Please also provide an entry for Release Changes, since this is
> user-facing change. Also for release branches.)
What is BKM for doing that for 7.1 release? File a PR and mention it
in ChangeLog?
--
WBR,
Andrew
Thank you, it is fixed in patch below. Ok for trunk?
Is it subject for backport for 5.* and 6.* releases?
2016-10-05 Andrew Senkevich
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c (OPTION_MASK_ISA_PCOMMIT_UNSET,
OPTION_MASK_ISA_PCOMMIT_SET): Deleted definitions.
(ix86
Hi,
this patch removes PCOMMIT instruction since it was deprecated,
please visit
https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2016/09/12/deprecate-pcommit-instruction
for details.
Regtested on x86_64. Is it Ok for trunk?
2016-10-03 Andrew Senkevich
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386
42 matches
Mail list logo
