Testcase for fixed PR.
Pushed.
PR tree-optimization/111003
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111003.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111003.c | 34
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr1
Hi All,
When we have a loop with more than 2 exits and a reduction I forgot to fill in
the PHI value for all alternate exits.
All alternate exits use the same PHI value so we should loop over the new
PHI elements and copy the value across since we call the reduction calculation
code only once for
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:44 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> Printing the raw symbol is useful in inline asm (e.g. in C++ to get the
> mangled name). Similar constraints are available in other targets (e.g.
> "S" for aarch64/riscv, "Cs" for m68k).
>
> There isn't a good way for x86 yet, e.g. "i" doesn
This patch made std::filesystem::equivalent correctly throw an exception
when either path does not exist as per [fs.op.equivalent]/4.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* src/c++17/fs_ops.cc (equivalent): Use || instead of &&.
* testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/equivalent.cc: Handle
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Currently, thread_locals in header modules cause ICEs. This patch makes
the required changes for them to work successfully.
Functions exported by a module need DECL_CONTEXT to be set, so we
inherit it from the variable we'
The idea makes sense to me, LGTM :)
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:43 AM Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
> This patch fixes the known issues on SLP cases:
>
> ble a2,zero,.L11
> addiw t1,a2,-1
> li a5,15
> bleut1,a5,.L9
> srliw a7,t1,4
> sllia
On 2024/01/10 22:52 UTC+8, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Gerald,
The Arm Cortex-M52 CPU has been added to the upstream:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642230.html
I would like to document this on the gcc-14 changes.html page.
I c
Since currently ranger does not work with the complexity of COND_EXPR in
some cases so delaying the simplification of `1/x` for signed types
help code generation.
tree-ssa/divide-8.c is a new testcase where this can help.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
PR
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_compound.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_compound): Do not use __not_.
(is_compound_v): Use is_fundamental_v instead.
Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 4 ++--
Printing the raw symbol is useful in inline asm (e.g. in C++ to get the
mangled name). Similar constraints are available in other targets (e.g.
"S" for aarch64/riscv, "Cs" for m68k).
There isn't a good way for x86 yet, e.g. "i" doesn't work for
PIC/-mcmodel=large. This patch adds "z".
gcc/Chang
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:06 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Hongtao Liu writes:
> >>
> >> +@opindex mapx-inline-asm-use-gpr32
> >> +@item -mapx-inline-asm-use-gpr32
> >> +When APX_F enabled, EGPR usage was by default disabled to prevent
> >> +unexpected EGPR generation in instructions that does not sup
On 1/10/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 05/01/2024 01:43, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to fix the bug when HAVE_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD is
not defined in dec_waiting_unlocked function. As io.h does
not include async.h, the WRLOCK and RWUNLOCK macros are
undefined.
libgfortran/ChangeLog
On 01-10 (21:21), Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:41, Ken Matsui wrote:
> >
> > This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_compound
> > by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
>
> OK for trunk (no need to wait for anything else to be approved)
Ok from myside. CCing Robin to see whether he has any more concerns.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jun Sha (Joshua)
Date: 2024-01-11 10:39
To: gcc-patches
CC: jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; jeffreyalaw;
christoph.muellner; juzhe.zhong; Jun Sha (Joshua); Jin Ma; Xianmi
This patch fixes the known issues on SLP cases:
ble a2,zero,.L11
addiw t1,a2,-1
li a5,15
bleut1,a5,.L9
srliw a7,t1,4
sllia7,a7,7
lui t3,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
lui a6,%hi(.LANCHOR0+128)
addit3,t3,%lo(.L
Hi Robin,
Thank you for your suggestions!
The patch has been updated by adding a new attribute to
disable alternative for xtheadvector or RVV1.0 instead of
overlaoding group_overlap.
Joshua
--
发件人:钟居哲
发送时间:2024年1月10日(星期三) 21:4
For th.vmadc/th.vmsbc as well as narrowing arithmetic instructions
and floating-point compare instructions, an illegal instruction
exception will be raised if the destination vector register overlaps
a source vector register group.
To handle this issue, we add an attribute "spec_restriction" to di
Sorry, this is the wrong patch. The good one is posted as v2,
which was bootstrapped and tested on loongarch64-linux-gnu.
Yujie
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/genopts/loongarch.opt.in: Mark -m[no-]recip as
aliases to -mrecip={all,none}.
* config/loongarch/loongarch.opt: Same.
* config/loongarch/loongarch-def.h: Modify ABI condition macros for
convenience.
* config/loongarc
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/genopts/loongarch.opt.in: Mark -m[no-]recip as
aliases to -mrecip={all,none}.
* config/loongarch/loongarch.opt: Same.
* config/loongarch/loongarch-def.h: Modify ABI condition macros for
convenience.
* config/loongarc
v1 -> v2:
Do not save la_target directly to struct cl_target_options in
TARGET_OPTION_SAVE, update to *opts first instead, since
it is getting saved later.
LTO option streaming and target attributes both require per-function
target configuration, which is achieved via option save/restore.
We implement TARGET_OPTION_{SAVE,RESTORE} to switch the la_target
context in addition to other automatically maintained option states
(via the "Save" option propert
From: Pan Li
The insert_var_expansion_initialization depends on the
HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS to initialize the unrolling variables
to +0.0f when -0.0f and no-signed-option. Unfortunately,
we should always keep the -0.0f here because:
* The -0.0f is always the correct initial value.
* We need to suppo
Pushed to r14-7125.
在 2024/1/6 下午4:54, Lulu Cheng 写道:
There are two mode iterators defined in the loongarch.md:
(define_mode_iterator GPR [SI (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
and
(define_mode_iterator X [(SI "!TARGET_64BIT") (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
Replace the mode in the bit arithmetic fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 5:44 PM
> To: Liu, Hongtao
> Cc: Jiang, Haochen ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> ubiz...@gmail.com; bur...@net-b.de; san...@codesourcery.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Add AVX10.1 related macros
>
> On Wed, J
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
This simplifies the operator() of the _Pipe and _Partial range adaptor
closure objects using C++23 deducing this, allowing us to condense
multiple operator() overloads into one.
The new __like_t alias template is similar to the
Hi David.
Thanks for the review!
> > +.. function:: void\
> > + gcc_jit_lvalue_add_string_attribute (gcc_jit_lvalue
> > *variable,
> > +enum
> > gcc_jit_fn_attribute attribute,
>
Here it is: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2023q4/001725.html
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 18:44 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 18:29 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > David: Ping in case you missed this patch.
>
> For some reason it's not showing up in patchwork (or, at least, I
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 18:29 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> David: Ping in case you missed this patch.
For some reason it's not showing up in patchwork (or, at least, I can't
find it there). Do you have a URL for it there?
Sorry about this
Dave
>
> On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 17:37 -0800, Andrew Pins
Hi, Richard,
Would you please talk a look at this patch?
Thanks,
Feng
From: Feng Xue OS
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 6:28 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Do not count unused scalar use when marking STMT_VINFO_LIVE_P
[PR113091]
This
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 17:38 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 11:33 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 10:25 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch adds the support of the sizeof operator.
> > > I was wondering if this new API entrypoint should
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 17:02 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Just to make sure since we are in stage 4.
Are we? I haven't seen an announcement, and it looked from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2024-January/243117.html
that we might be pushing back the date for it.
> Does that mean I can merge
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 21:28, Michael Levine (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)
wrote:
>
> From a67cfd07ce27a62f764b381268502acb68b6bad9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Levine
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:48:46 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Removed a duplicate define directive for
> __glibcxx_want_rang
David: Ping in case you missed this patch.
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 17:37 -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:31 PM Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds support for machine-dependent builtins in libgccjit
> > (bug 108762).
> >
> > There are tw
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 22:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
OK (thanks, this was on my TODO list).
> -- >8 --
>
> Since _Nth_type has a fallback native implementation, use
> _GLIBCXX_USE_BUILTIN_TRAIT when deciding whether __type_pack_eleme
It seems I cannot reproduce the issue.
Should we drop this patch, then?
Or do you think there's value in keeping it?
On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 19:01 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 21:23 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Sorry, forgot to attach the patch.
> >
> >
David: Ping in case you missed it.
On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 14:56 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> David: Ping.
> I guess if we want to have this merged for this release, it should be
> sooner rather than later (if it's still an option).
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 18:04 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
Hongtao Liu writes:
>>
>> +@opindex mapx-inline-asm-use-gpr32
>> +@item -mapx-inline-asm-use-gpr32
>> +When APX_F enabled, EGPR usage was by default disabled to prevent
>> +unexpected EGPR generation in instructions that does not support it.
>> +To invoke EGPR usage in inline asm, use this switch
Since all the pipelines should be tuned to their cost model, they
would be different anyway. If it would be simpler for now, I could
separate the files out.
I think I'm getting a bit confused. Is there a reason why we would
want to exchange scheduler descriptions like the example you
provided?
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 11:33 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 10:25 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds the support of the sizeof operator.
> > I was wondering if this new API entrypoint should take a location
> > as
> > a
> > parameter. What do you think?
>
Dear all,
we are accepting loop annotations IVDEP, UNROLL n, VECTOR, and NOVECTOR
for ordinary do loops, but ICE when such an annotation is specified
before a DO CONCURRENT loop.
Since at least the Intel compilers recognize some of the annotations
also for DO CONCURRENT, it seems natural to exten
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 10:27 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 10:19 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-12-11 at 19:20 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the following commands, but
> > > this
> > > fails even on master:
> > >
> > >
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Since _Nth_type has a fallback native implementation, use
_GLIBCXX_USE_BUILTIN_TRAIT when deciding whether __type_pack_element
is available so that we can easily toggle which implementation
to use.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
Just to make sure since we are in stage 4.
Does that mean I can merge it?
In general, how would I know if it's OK to merge?
If the patch is in the state Accepted on patchwork, does that mean it's
always OK to merge no matter the stage we're in?
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 11:35 -0500, David Malcolm wro
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
This avoids redundant moves when composing and partially applying range
adaptor objects.
Note that the new constraints on _Partial's constructor templates are
needed so that it's not inadvertently chosen over the copy construct
Ping
Thanks, Jonny
On 06/12/2023 22:33, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Revised version of this patch after review.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> htdocs: correct spelling and use https in examples.
>
>
>
>>From 52d413bce86827f2add424e78321b509661f6f59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jonathan Grant
> Date
Julian Brown wrote:
This patch adds support for parsing general lvalues ("locator list item
types") for OpenMP "map", "to" and "from" clauses to the C front-end,
similar to the previously-posted patch for C++. Such syntax is permitted
for OpenMP 5.0 and above. It was previously posted for mainl
2024-01-10 Jonathan Grant
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/extend.texi: Update builtin example for __builtin_FILE
__builtin_LINE __builtin_FUNCTION.
>From 66290eb477dd1a99310ad9972c45391c2a87c1c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Grant
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:02:06 +
Subject: [PAT
On 03/12/2023 17:55, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-12-03 at 11:59 +, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/12/2023 04:03, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2023-12-03 at 00:17 +, Jonny Grant wrote:
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ To configure GCC:
@smallexample
% mkdir @var{objdir}
>>>
2024-01-10 Jonathan Grant
gcc/doc
* install.texi: show ../ back from the objdir in the example invoking
configure
correct spelling support, arithmetics
This page is what is generated from install.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>From c9fec3796600cc44c083
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:47, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_scalar
> by dispatching to the new __is_scalar built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in is approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_traits (is_sc
From a67cfd07ce27a62f764b381268502acb68b6bad9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Levine
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:48:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Removed a duplicate define directive for
__glibcxx_want_ranges_iota
Signed-off-by: Michael Levine
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 1 -
1
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:47, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_signed
> by dispatching to the new __is_signed built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in is approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_traits (is_si
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:41, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_unsigned
> by dispatching to the new __is_unsigned built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in is approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_traits (i
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:41, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_compound
> by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
OK for trunk (no need to wait for anything else to be approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:47, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_arithmetic
> by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in is approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_trait
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:43, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of
> std::is_floating_point by dispatching to the new
> __is_floating_point built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in is approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 19:48, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_integral
> by dispatching to the new __is_integral built-in trait.
OK for trunk (if the new built-in gets approved).
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_traits
This is a v3 which addresses shortcomings of the v2 patch. v2 was
posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642448.html
The main issue in v2 is that we were using the final (transformed)
patterns in combine_reg_notes instead of the initial patterns (thanks
Richard S for
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:06 AM Andre Vieira (lists)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch is still work in progress, but posting to show failure with
> bitint-7 test where handle_stmt called from lower_mergeable_stmt ICE's
> because the idx (3) is out of range for the __BitInt(135) with a
> limb_prec of
On 01-10 (01:23), Ken Matsui wrote:
> This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_scalar.
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * cp-trait.def: Define __is_scalar.
> * constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle CPTK_IS_SCALAR.
> * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
> (fi
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 18:33, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>
> Am Mo., 8. Jan. 2024 um 03:25 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely
> :
> >
> > Tested x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > This adds std::runtime_format for C++26. These new overloaded functions
> > enhance the st
This patch series implements __is_integral, __is_floating_point,
__is_arithmetic, __is_unsigned, __is_signed, and __is_scalar built-in
traits and optimizes std::is_integral, std::is_floating_point,
std::is_arithmetic, std::is_unsigned, std::is_signed, std::is_scalar,
std::is_fundamental, and std::i
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_arithmetic.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_arithmetic.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle
CPTK_IS_ARITHMETIC.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewi
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_signed
by dispatching to the new __is_signed built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_signed): Use __is_signed built-in
trait.
(is_signed_v): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui
---
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_floating_point.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_floating_point.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle
CPTK_IS_FLOATING_POINT.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_e
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_integral.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_integral.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle
CPTK_IS_INTEGRAL.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_integral
by dispatching to the new __is_integral built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_integral): Use __is_integral
built-in trait.
(is_integral_v): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Ken Ma
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_fundamental
by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_fundamental_v): Use
__is_arithmetic built-in trait.
(is_fundamental): Likewise. Optimize
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_compound
by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_compound): Do not use __not_.
(is_compound_v): Use is_fundamental_v instead.
Signed-off-by: Ken Mat
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_signed.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_signed.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle CPTK_IS_SIGNED.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/C
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_scalar
by dispatching to the new __is_scalar built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
trait.
(is_scalar_v): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui
---
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_unsigned.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_unsigned.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle CPTK_IS_UNSIGNED.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
gcc/tests
This patch implements built-in trait for std::is_scalar.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __is_scalar.
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle CPTK_IS_SCALAR.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Likewise.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/C
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_arithmetic
by dispatching to the new __is_arithmetic built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_arithmetic): Use __is_arithmetic
built-in trait.
(is_arithmetic_v): Likewise.
Signed-off-
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of
std::is_floating_point by dispatching to the new
__is_floating_point built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_floating_point): Use
__is_floating_point built-in trait.
(is_floating_point_v): Li
This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_unsigned
by dispatching to the new __is_unsigned built-in trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (is_unsigned): Use __is_unsigned
built-in trait.
(is_unsigned_v): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Ken Ma
> Since all the pipelines should be tuned to their cost model, they
> would be different anyway. If it would be simpler for now, I could
> separate the files out.
> I think I'm getting a bit confused. Is there a reason why we would
> want to exchange scheduler descriptions like the example you
> pr
Hi,
This patch is still work in progress, but posting to show failure with
bitint-7 test where handle_stmt called from lower_mergeable_stmt ICE's
because the idx (3) is out of range for the __BitInt(135) with a
limb_prec of 64.
I hacked gcc locally to work around this issue and still have on
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:07:16PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> This changes the tests I committed for PR113287 to also
> run on targets that don't support bitint.
>
> Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and no issues and
> tests run on both.
>
> Ok for master?
Yes, thank
Am Mo., 8. Jan. 2024 um 03:25 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely :
>
> Tested x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This adds std::runtime_format for C++26. These new overloaded functions
> enhance the std::format API so that it isn't necessary to use the less
> ergonomic std::
libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Fix assignment of value-initialized iterator
[PR112477]
Now that _M_Detach do not reset iterator _M_version value we need to
reset it when
the iterator is attached to a new sequence. Even if this sequencer is
null like when
assigning a value-initialized iterator. In
Hi Robin,
On 1/10/2024 8:00 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi Edwin,
This patch copies the vector reservations from generic-ooo.md and
inserts them into generic.md and sifive.md. Creates new vector crypto related
insn reservations.
In principle, the changes look good to me but I wonder if we could
spl
Wilco Dijkstra writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>>> +#define MAX_SET_SIZE(speed) (speed ? 256 : 96)
>>
>> Since this isn't (AFAIK) a standard macro, there doesn't seem to be
>> any need to put it in the header file. It could just go at the head
>> of aarch64.cc instead.
>
> Sure, I've moved it in v4.
>
>>
> But I'm afraid I have no idea how is this supposed to work on
> non-bitint targets or where __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ is smaller than 9020.
> There is no loop at all there, so what should be vectorized?
>
Yeah It was giving an unresolved and I didn't notice in diff.
> I'd say introduce
> # Return 1
Wilco Dijkstra writes:
> GCC tends to optimistically create CONST of globals with an immediate offset.
> However it is almost always better to CSE addresses of globals and add
> immediate
> offsets separately (the offset could be merged later in single-use cases).
> Splitting CONST expressions wi
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:59 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/17/23 00:33, Jin Ma wrote:
> > The XTheadInt ISA extension provides acceleration interruption
> > instructions as defined in T-Head-specific:
> > * th.ipush
> > * th.ipop
> >
> > Ref:
> > https://github.com/T-head-Semi/thead-extension-sp
Congratulations on landing this impressive work in GCC 14!
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024, waffl3x wrote:
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux with no regressions.
>
> I'm considering this finished, I have CWG2586 working but I have not
> included it in this version of the patch. I was not happy with t
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 04:55:00PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> PR tree-optimization/113287
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_100-pr113287.c: Support non-bitint.
This part is ok.
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_99-pr113287.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-
Hi All,
This changes the tests I committed for PR113287 to also
run on targets that don't support bitint.
Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
and no issues and tests run on both.
Ok for master?
Thanks,
Tamar
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/113287
On 1/9/24 19:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Nothing uses this, so delete it to avoid confusion.
config/ChangeLog:
* acinclude.m4 (CYG_AC_PATH_LIBERTY): Delete.
OK
jeff
Add terminating `/' character missing from one of the test harness
command clauses in pr105314.c. This causes no issue with compilation
owing to another comment immediately following, but would cause a:
pr105314.c:3:1: warning: "/*" within comment [-Wcomment]
message if warnings were enabled.
On 1/10/24 06:01, Richard Sandiford wrote:
So to get an idea for expectations: would it be a requirement that a
GCC 15 submission is enabled unconditionally and all known issues in
the ports fixed?
I don't think we need to fix those latent port issues as a hard
requirement. I try to balance
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Depending on how you look at it you may qualify this as a bug fix (for
> > the commit referred; it's surely rare enough a case I missed in original
> > testing) or a missed optimisation. Either way it's a narrow-scoped very
> > small change, almost an obv
On 1/10/24 06:35, Richard Biener wrote:
I think x86 maintainers could opt to disable the pass - so it would
be opt-out. It's reasonable to expect them to fix the backend given
there's nothing really wrong with the new pass, it just does
something that wasn't done before at that point?
That's
Hi!
This test was already fixed by r14-6051 aka PR112770 fix.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2024-01-10 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/112734
* gcc.dg/bitint-64.c: New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-64.c.jj 2024-01-10 17:17:08.438466886 +01
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:02 PM liuhongt wrote:
>
> After r14-2692-g1c6231c05bdcca, the option is defined as EnumSet and
> -fcf-protection=branch won't unset any others bits since they're in
> different groups. So to override -fcf-protection, an explicit
> -fcf-protection=none needs to be added and
Hi Edwin,
> This patch copies the vector reservations from generic-ooo.md and
> inserts them into generic.md and sifive.md. Creates new vector crypto related
> insn reservations.
In principle, the changes look good to me but I wonder if we could
split off the vector parts from generic-ooo into th
GCC tends to optimistically create CONST of globals with an immediate offset.
However it is almost always better to CSE addresses of globals and add immediate
offsets separately (the offset could be merged later in single-use cases).
Splitting CONST expressions with an index in aarch64_legitimize_
LGTM.
Regards
Robin
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo