Le 04/03/2023 à 22:20, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 04.03.23 um 18:09 schrieb Mikael Morin:
There was a comment about the old_symbol thing at the end of my previous
message:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613354.html
I think Tobias might be the better person to
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 06:32:15PM -, Roger Sayle wrote:
> This patch addresses PR rtl-optimization/106594, a P1 performance
> regression affecting aarch64.
>
> This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{
Hi Mikael,
Am 04.03.23 um 18:09 schrieb Mikael Morin:
There was a comment about the old_symbol thing at the end of my previous
message:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613354.html
I think Tobias might be the better person to answer this.
But when playing with variations o
This patch addresses PR rtl-optimization/106594, a P1 performance
regression affecting aarch64.
This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32},
with no new failures.
If someone (who can regression test this
Le 04/03/2023 à 17:06, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Sorry, attached the wrong patch.
Here's the correct one.
Harald
Am 04.03.23 um 17:02 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches:
The attached revised version uses the above proven changes,
and extends the new testcase class_74.f90 by variations of
th
Sorry, attached the wrong patch.
Here's the correct one.
Harald
Am 04.03.23 um 17:02 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches:
The attached revised version uses the above proven changes,
and extends the new testcase class_74.f90 by variations of
the failures remaining with version 1 so that diff
Hi Mikael!
Am 04.03.23 um 14:56 schrieb Mikael Morin:
I have found the time finally. It's not as bad as it seemed. See below.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index eec0314cf4c..72d8c6f1c14 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+ sym->attr.p
Hi Mikael!
Am 04.03.23 um 14:56 schrieb Mikael Morin:
I have found the time finally. It's not as bad as it seemed. See below.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index eec0314cf4c..72d8c6f1c14 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+ sym->attr.p
Le 03/03/2023 à 22:24, Mikael Morin a écrit :
I have two comments, one about the handling of as and sym->as, which I
quite don't understand, but I haven't had time to write something about it.
I have found the time finally. It's not as bad as it seemed. See below.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/
Wrong subject: the library is libstdc++, not "cc++".
On Fri, 2022-12-30 at 10:30 +, Jonny Grant wrote:
> 2022-12-30 Jonathan Grant
> * libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml: update copyright year in
> libstdcc++ manual
Wrong ChangeLog format, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Ch
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file, 'gcc-13.1-b20230212.fr.po',
> Am 04.03.2023 um 10:02 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> :
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch adjusts remaining references to the removed m_vecdata
> array from vec.h in various comments.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok
Richard
> 2023-03-04 Jakub Jelinek
>
>PR
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:31 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Mere cosmetics.
>
> - if (foo != NULL)
> free (foo);
>
> With the caveat that coccinelle ruins replacement whitespace or i'm
> uneducated enough to be unable to _not_ run the diff through
> sed -e 's/^+\([
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 07:23:32PM +0100, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
> this patch changes SLP test expectations. As we only vectorize when no
> more than one rgroup is present, no vectorization is performed.
This broke the tests, I'm seeing syntax errors:
ERROR: gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c -f
Hi!
The following patch adjusts remaining references to the removed m_vecdata
array from vec.h in various comments.
Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2023-03-04 Jakub Jelinek
PR middle-end/109006
* vec.cc (test_auto_alias): Adjust comment for removal of
m_vecdata.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 08:54:32AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> Patch is OK, but I wonder if it would even better to just hardcode
> caret_max_width as 80 here, to better eliminate that influence from
> from the environment in the unit tests? I think all of the te
16 matches
Mail list logo
