On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 11:22 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
>
> 在 2022/9/4 上午10:51, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
>
> > On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 10:26 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> >
> > > If the above modifications are not added, the function call is:
> > >
> > > bl %plt(test1)
> > >
> > > now is :
> > >
> > > bl te
在 2022/9/4 上午10:51, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 10:26 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
If the above modifications are not added, the function call is:
bl %plt(test1)
now is :
bl test1
Regarding "%plt(...)", in the binutils code:
/* For compatible old asm code. */
if (0 == str
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 10:26 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> If the above modifications are not added, the function call is:
>
> bl %plt(test1)
>
> now is :
>
> bl test1
Regarding "%plt(...)", in the binutils code:
/* For compatible old asm code. */
if (0 == strcmp (op_c_str, "plt"))
b
I think the following modification should be added:
git diff loongarch/predicates.md
+;; Do not use GOT to access external symbols, when define
+;; TARGET_DIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS.
+
(define_predicate "is_const_call_local_symbol"
(and (match_operand 0 "const_call_insn_operand")
(ior (mat
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 4:31 AM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 18:54 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > We'd like to introduce a new codegen option to align with the old
> > "-Wa,-mla-global-with-pcrel" and avoid a performance & size regression
> > building the Linux kernel wit
In the edge case of a coroutine not containing any locals, the ifcd/swch
temporaries would get added to the coroutine frame, corrupting its
layout. We can prevent this by ensuring that in cases where the scope of
the if/switch is the same as the coroutine frame one, we insert a
wrapping BIND_EXPR a
On 9/2/2022 1:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 9/1/22 14:32, Michael Matz wrote:
Hello,
okay, I'll bite :) DBG_REGISTER_NUMBER? DEBUGGER_REGNO?
Yep, I'm fine with the shorter macro name.
May I install such a change?
Yes.
jeff
On 9/3/2022 7:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
There are 6 idioms of the same check and I'd like to add more.
It seems there are macros as well as functions for things like
REAL_VALUE_ISINF and REAL_VALUE_NEGATIVE. I don't know if there was
historical need for this duplicity, but
This patch implements https://wg21.link/p2266, which, once again,
changes the implicit move rules. Here's a brief summary of various
changes in this area:
r125211: Introduced moving from certain lvalues when returning them
r171071: CWG 1148, enable move from value parameter on return
r212099: CWG
Possible NANs can never be a singleton, so they will never be
propagated. This was the intent, and then the signed zero code crept
in, and was mistakenly checked before the NAN.
PR 106819
gcc/ChangeLog:
* value-range.cc (frange::singleton_p): Move NAN check to the top.
gcc/test
There are 6 idioms of the same check and I'd like to add more.
It seems there are macros as well as functions for things like
REAL_VALUE_ISINF and REAL_VALUE_NEGATIVE. I don't know if there was
historical need for this duplicity, but I think it's cleaner if we
start gravitating towards inline fun
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:29:52PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:00:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > We might as well use the same flag name, and document it to mean what it
> > currently means for GCC.
>
> Ok, following patch introduces -Wunicode (on by default).
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:00:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> We might as well use the same flag name, and document it to mean what it
> currently means for GCC.
Ok, following patch introduces -Wunicode (on by default).
> It looks like this is handling \N{abc}, for which "incomplete" seems lik
Hi!
The following patch implements part of the OpenMP 5.2 changes related
to ordered loops and with the assumed resolution of
https://github.com/OpenMP/spec/issues/3302 issues.
The changes are:
1) the depend clause on stand-alone ordered constructs has been renamed
to doacross (because depend
14 matches
Mail list logo
