Over the past few months I have been working on re-adding gcj back into
gcc, as the fundamental issue holding it back (the need to create an
open-source implementation of java from the ground up) has since been
solved by the opening of the JDK.
Unfortunately, as the old gcj code is several years o
On 4/15/22 07:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY bit is supposed to separate
PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs that should be replaced by one object or subobjects of it
(variable, TARGET_EXPR slot, ...) from other PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs that should
be replaced by different objects or s
Hi,
This is the second time i ping this patch.
I just remind you of it.
Mohamed
في الأحد، ٣ أبريل، ٢٠٢٢ ٤:٤١ م Mohamed Atef كتب:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ping this patch.
> Thanks
>
> Mohamed
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 11:33 AM Mohamed Atef
> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>I know it's too much.
>> we
Fix issue PR99619, which asks to optimize TLS access based on
visibility. The fix is implemented as an IPA optimization, which allows
to take optimized visibility status into account (as well as avoid
modifying all language frontends).
2022-04-17 Artem Klimov
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-e
On 06/04/2022 09:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Ok, for the default output this is good. The output can be explained in the
> documentation. I will try to help here.
Splendid, thanks! I would be perfectly happy with better and/or more intuitive
messages too, but I figured it shouldn't delay the rest
On Apr 11 2022, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/const7.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/const7.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..5bcf94897a8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/const7.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +// PR c++/104142
> +//
