In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the function
in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and template
arguments. So let's colorize it, and maybe the template argument bindings
while we're at it.
I've somewhat arbitrarily chosen bold green for the
Hi,
this patch removes apparently forgotten debugging hack (which got in during
the speculative call patchset) which reduces hot bb threshold. This does not
make sense since it is set and reset randomly as the summaries are processed.
One problem is that we set the BB threshold to make certain BBs
Hi,
thunks are not transparent for ipa-modref summary since it cares about offsets
from pointer parameters and also for virtual thunk about the read from memory
in there. We however use function_or_virtual_thunk_symbol to get the summary
that may lead to wrong code (and does in two testsuite testc
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:54 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:02 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:02 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Changes in the v4 patch.
> > > >
> > > > 1. Add nodirect_extern_acc
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021, 10:56 Olivier Hainque via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> (Thanks for your feedback Jonathan)
>
> > On 10 Dec 2021, at 19:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious why _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_CTYPE_TR1 is not defined if VxWorks
> > has isblank, the configure check
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:57 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/2021 8:41 AM, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > The function comment for adjust_field_tree_exp says this special case
> > is for handling trees whose operands may contain pointers to RTL instead
> > of to trees. But ever sinc
Hi!
Ye that should work since the lvalue:s are always created first.
I haven't tried it, but I should add it to the testcase, together with
some circular linked list thing, to see that nothing gets stuck
running in a circle.
Maybe I should verify this does not blow up the lib, too:
extern con
On 10/12/2021 22:49, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
Dear all,
when accessing CLASS components we need to ensure that the
corresponding class container has already been built.
Invalid code, e.g. the testcase in PR103606, may otherwise
generate segfaults due to invalid reads.
Regtested on x86_6
Hi!
> s/an union/a union/
> s/a rvalue/an rvalue/
Heh no way ... and I though I knew English grammar :)
Had to look that up to see what the deal was but it makes sense.
yunion, arevalue.
> s/wrong-field-name/wrong-field-obj/
>
> to match the struct example (given that the issue being tested f
Pushed to the branch.
With this patch, the instructions generated are the ones
that are expected, for example:
$ objdump --disassemble sum_r17.o | grep xsaddqp
3cc: 08 08 00 fc xsaddqp v0,v0,v1
3dc: 08 08 00 fc xsaddqp v0,v0,v1
3ec: 08 08 00 fc xsaddqp v0,v0,v1
410: 08
(Thanks for your feedback Jonathan)
> On 10 Dec 2021, at 19:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'm curious why _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_CTYPE_TR1 is not defined if VxWorks
> has isblank, the configure check is:
Oh, hmm, very good point. The reason was that the definition
of isblank is conditioned on _C99/_
11 matches
Mail list logo