Hi:
The testsuite has a typo in "dg-final scan-assembler", s/mthc1/mtc1/.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:21 PM Dragan Mladjenovic
wrote:
>
> On 01.10.2019. 21:37, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 9/25/19 1:16 AM, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote:
> >> From: "Dragan Mladjenovic"
> >>
> >> This fixes the issue by check
All,
It seems I fat-fingered a commit earlier today, where
I accidently included a duplicate of gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
in itselfi on trunk. This added over 11000 lines of bloat to
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog. I have committed a patch to
remove the bloat at revision 276630. Sorry about the
unfor
Hi,
this patch fixes a typo in the way edge badness is calculated I noticed
while verifing the code.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
* ipa-inline.c: Fix type; compute size rather than self_size
for size of caller function.
Index: ipa-inline.c
==
I must apologise not posting this before committing. I left for a
vacation this morning and I thought that this problem and the one
posted by Gilles were best fixed before departing. The patch only
touches the new ISO_Fortran binding feature and so I thought that I
would be safe to do this.
It was
Hi Bernd,
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:12:19AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 10/5/19 10:08 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I'll just review the combine part.
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:36:34AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >> --- gcc/combine.c (revision 276598)
> >> +++ gcc/combine.
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:31:34PM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
wrote:
> Remove all -L directories from LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC32 and
> LINK_OS_EXTRA_SPEC64 so that user directories specified at
> build time have higher preference over the advance toolchain libraries.
>
> Set MD_STARTFILE_P
Tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit?
The error message says it all.
2019-10-05 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91801
* simplify.c (gfc_simplify_reshape): Convert a gcc_assert into a
gfc_error as a user can easily hit the condition.
2019-10-05 Steven G. Kargl
Updates from the February, 2019 (Kona) meeting.
Applied to CVS.
Index: cxx-dr-status.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.35 cxx-dr-status.html
--- cxx-dr-statu
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:27:08AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 03:18:45PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > >> the new testcases FAILs on sparc and a couple of other targets:
> > >>
> > >> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr91497.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> > >>
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14 PM Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > lra_reg has an actual_call_used_reg_set field that is only used during
>> > inheritance. This in turn required a special lra_create_live_ranges
>> > pa
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 03:18:45PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> >> the new testcases FAILs on sparc and a couple of other targets:
> >>
> >> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr91497.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> >>
> >> Excess errors:
> >> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran
Hi Steve,
>> the new testcases FAILs on sparc and a couple of other targets:
>>
>> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr91497.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
>>
>> Excess errors:
>> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr91497.f90:13:13:
>> Error: Old-style type declaration REAL*10 not suppo
Jeff Law writes:
> On 9/26/19 6:04 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Although it's possible to define the SVE intrinsics in a normal header
>> file, it's much more convenient to define them directly in the compiler.
>> This also speeds up compilation and gives better error messages.
>>
>> The idea
Hi Segher,
On 10/5/19 10:08 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> I'll just review the combine part.
>
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:36:34AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- gcc/combine.c(revision 276598)
>> +++ gcc/combine.c(working copy)
>> @@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ combine_instr
Jeff Law writes:
> On 10/3/19 6:47 AM, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>>
>> Jeff Law writes:
>>
>>> On 10/1/19 4:11 AM, Andrea Corallo wrote:
Martin Jambor writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30 2019, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'd like to submit this patch.
>> It rel
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:28:26AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 10/5/19 9:26 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > To get 95% of the benefit for only 2% of the pain, you can make an inline
> > function where there was a macro before, an
On 10/5/19 9:26 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Same objections as before. As long as we're using macros like this,
>> we're going to have increased potential for shadowing problems and
>> macros which touch implementation details that j
Darwin's linker doesn't like text section relocations (they require special
enabling).
At least, the Fortran FE seems to generate cases where the initialiser for a
pointer
constant can need a relocation. We can handle this by special-casing
SECCAT_RODATA when the relocation is present by placin
Hi Bernd,
I'll just review the combine part.
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:36:34AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> --- gcc/combine.c (revision 276598)
> +++ gcc/combine.c (working copy)
> @@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ combine_instructions (rtx_insn *f, unsigned int nr
>FOR_BB_INSNS (this_basi
Hi,
this fixes -Wshadow=local warnings in the following files:
M gcc/df-problems.c
M gcc/df-scan.c
M gcc/diagnostic-show-locus.c
M gcc/dse.c
M gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
M gcc/dwarf2out.c
M gcc/emit-rtl.c
M gcc/expmed.c
M gcc/final.c
M gcc/fold-con
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:34:39PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > @@ -1656,6 +1671,64 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexp
> >lval, non_constant_p, overflow_p);
> > if (!DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (fun))
> > {
> > + if (cxx_dialect >= cx
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> Same objections as before. As long as we're using macros like this,
> we're going to have increased potential for shadowing problems and
> macros which touch implementation details that just happen to be
> available in the context where t
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:12:37AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 10/3/19 5:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > What effect does this have on the cc1/cc1plus .text sizes?
>
> r276457:
>
> with patch, --enable-languages=all --enable-checking=yes,rtl
> $ size gcc/cc1
>textdata bss de
23 matches
Mail list logo
