On 27.04.19 14:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 12:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:26:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 15.03.19 16:49, Robin Dapp wrote:
during the last few days I tried to get D running on s390x (apparently
the first Big E
On 29/04/19 00:18 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 14:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/19 11:21 +0100, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
>New diff attached.
Thanks, this looks great. I think we can apply this as soon as stage 1
begins (which should be Real Soon Now).
Tested o
On 28/04/19 22:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/04/19 00:18 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 14:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/19 11:21 +0100, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
New diff attached.
Thanks, this looks great. I think we can apply this as soon as stage 1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 14:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 24/04/19 11:21 +0100, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
> >New diff attached.
>
> Thanks, this looks great. I think we can apply this as soon as stage 1
> begins (which should be Real Soon Now).
Tested on Linux-PPC64, committed to trunk. Congrats,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 00:18, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 14:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On 24/04/19 11:21 +0100, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
> > >New diff attached.
> >
> > Thanks, this looks great. I think we can apply this as soon as stage 1
> > begins (which should
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-9.1-b20190414.sv.po',
Hi Paul,
Could you provide the patch, please, or was it already posted?
Actually, no. I was so intent on providing the test cases that
I missed the patch itself :-)
Here it is.
Regards
Thomas
Index: fortran/expr.c
===
-
Hi Thomas,
> (Dominique, could you tell us again what the magic incantation for
> 32-bit mode is?)
I use:
time make -k -j8 check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" > &
check-*.log &
Dominique
Hi Thomas,
Could you provide the patch, please, or was it already posted?
Cheers
Paul
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 10:46, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> going back a patch which was not included in gcc-9 because it was too
> late in the development cycle, here is a patch which, when optim
Hello world,
going back a patch which was not included in gcc-9 because it was too
late in the development cycle, here is a patch which, when optimizing
and not optimizing for size, does inline packing for an argument.
As you can see from the code and the test cases, there is provision
for option
10 matches
Mail list logo
