In PR 88000 the reporter expects to be able to use an explicit
register local variable in a context where it isn't supported
i.e., for something other than an input or output of an asm
statement: namely to pass it as argument to a user-defined
function. GCC emits unexpected object code in this ca
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:17:41AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > OK, fair enough. Another option is to just disable -many when gcc is
> > in development, like we enable checking.
>
> That is a good plan for GCC 9 at least.
Here
On 11/13/18 6:06 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> PR rtl-optimization/87507
>> * lower-subreg.c (operand_for_simple_move_operator): New function.
>> (simple_move): Strip simple operators.
>> (find_pseudo_copy): Likewise.
>> (resolve_operand_for_simple_move_operator): New functio
On 11/12/18 6:39 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi again,
On 08/11/18 10:26, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
two additional grokdeclarator locations that we can easily fix by
using declarator->id_loc. Slightly more interesting, testing revealed
a latent issue in the make_id_declarator uses:
cp_parser_me
> PR rtl-optimization/87507
> * lower-subreg.c (operand_for_simple_move_operator): New function.
> (simple_move): Strip simple operators.
> (find_pseudo_copy): Likewise.
> (resolve_operand_for_simple_move_operator): New function.
> (resolve_simple_move): Strip si
Hi!
Gimple debug binds (both normal and source) need to have a decl as the first
operand. The simd clone adjustment code would in some cases transform that
into an ARRAY_REF. The following patch removes such debug stmts.
In the future we could have a VAR_DECL with DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN pointing t
On 13/11/18 23:19 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/11/18 22:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (bitset::find_first_unset()): Remove
unused function.
(bitset::get_first_unset()): Remove loop, if there's are unset bits
then _M_next_wo
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, with GCC before 4.3 one can't instantiate std::pair
where one or both of the template parameters are reference types, because
the std::pair constructor has arguments references to the template parameter
types and the CWG that resolved hasn't been applied to those compil
On 13/11/18 22:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
@@ -898,9 +907,10 @@ namespace pmr
{
auto p = std::lower_bound(std::begin(pool_sizes), std::end(pool_sizes),
opts.largest_required_pool_block);
-if (int npools = p - std::begin(pool_sizes))
- return npool
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, it is unclear if zero_extract is well defined
if the second argument is 0. x86 intrinsic require bzhi and bextr to be
well defined in those cases (extraction of 0 bits results in 0), but
e.g. combiner hapilly transforms that into << 64 >> 64, simplify-rtx.c,
while it f
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Though, in this particular case the sqrt call is
> > > optimized away, so it wouldn't make a difference.
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk, or
> > > should I do the gimple_build_assi
On 13/11/18 22:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (bitset::find_first_unset()): Remove
unused function.
(bitset::get_first_unset()): Remove loop, if there's are unset bits
then _M_next_word refers to the first one and there's no need to
On 12/11/18 14:30, Richard Biener wrote:
I guess I already asked this question when WIDEN_MULT_PLUS_EXPR was
introduced - but isn't that fully contained within a DOT_PROD_EXPR?
I'm not sure what exactly you mean here.
A mailing list search to find that post was unsuccessful. The earliest
it
@@ -932,8 +946,7 @@ namespace pmr
}
void
- __pool_resource::deallocate(void* p, size_t bytes [[maybe_unused]],
- size_t alignment [[maybe_unused]])
+ __pool_resource::deallocate(void* p, size_t bytes, size_t alignment)
{
const auto it
= std::lower_bou
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (bitset::find_first_unset()): Remove
unused function.
(bitset::get_first_unset()): Remove loop, if there's are unset bits
then _M_next_word refers to the first one and there's no need to loop.
(_Pool::_Pool(size_t, size_t), _Po
Make the munge_options function round the largest_required_pool_block
value to a multiple of the smallest pool size (currently 8 bytes) to
avoid pools with odd sizes.
Ensure there is a pool large enough for blocks of the requested size.
Previously when largest_required_pool_block was exactly equa
Since a big_block rounds up the size to a multiple of big_block::min it
is wrong to assert that the supplied number of bytes equals the
big_block's size(). Add big_block::alloc_size(size_t) to calculate the
allocated size consistently, and add comments to the code.
* src/c++17/memory_reso
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (bitset::full()): Handle edge case
for _M_next_word maximum value.
(bitset::get_first_unset(), bitset::set(size_type)): Use
update_next_word() to update _M_next_word.
(bitset::update_next_word()): New function, avoiding wraparo
ping
On 29/10/2018 14:22, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
The same as previous pings except I removed the patch which updates the
hard-coded device data - I'll commit that later as "obvious".
Ok for trunk?
The following series of patches extends MCU device data handling for
the msp430
target, allo
On 11/13/18 4:09 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 11/13/2018 10:53 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> I think with the above results, I think the patch is ready for review.
>> I'm attaching the latest updated patch below.
>>
>> Again, this passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64le-linux with
>> no re
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:01 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/11/2018 04:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > When gcc can't find a header file, it's a hard error that stops the build,
> > typically requiring the user to mess around with compile flags, Makefiles,
> > dependencies, and so forth.
> >
> > O
On 11/13/2018 10:53 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 11/13/18 9:01 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
I could verify that, your patch fixes all the ICEs I saw with
arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain!
There are some differences on the test results, because I compare the latest
results with something which is old.
I h
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:32 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/11/2018 02:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 11:01 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2018 12:01 AM, Eric Gallager wrote:
> >>> On 11/9/18, David Malcolm wrote:
> This patch adds a fix-it hint to various po
Only do the optimization if flag_signed_zeros &&
!flag_finite_math_only is set, as suggested in the previous iteration.
Before, the patch did the optimization even when -fno-signed-zeros and
-ffinite-math-only was set. This could generate badly incorrect
results for targets that do not support inf
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:40 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:49:55AM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > the following patch fix the subjected issue
> >
> > Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/
Hi,
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
>> Attached is the patch for new -flive-patching=[inline-only-static |
>> inline-clone] master option.
>>
>> '-flive-patching=LEVEL'
>> Control GCC's optimizations to provide a safe compilation for
>> live-patching. Provides m
This patch updates the current C++ status with proposals accepted
at the recent San Diego meeting.
Committed to CVS.
Index: projects/cxx-status.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html,v
retrieving revision
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I'd look at doing the instrumentation after var-tracking has run - that is
> what computes the locations in the end. That means instrumenting on late RTL
> after register allocation (and eventually with branch range restrictions in
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 14:54 -0500, Mike Gulick wrote:
> 2018-11-13 Mike Gulick
[...]
> * gcc/diagnostic-core.h (num_digits): Add extern definition.
FWIW you moved the decl to diagnostic.h, but didn't update the above
ChangeLog entry.
[...]
> diff --git a/libcpp/location-example.txt b/
2018-11-13 Mike Gulick
PR preprocessor/83173
* gcc/input.c (dump_location_info): Dump reason and
included_from fields from line_map_ordinary struct. Fix
indentation when location > 5 digits.
* libcpp/location-example.txt: Update example
-fdump-in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/13/18 5:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > [[likely]] and [[unlikely]] are equivalent to the GNU hot/cold attributes,
> > except that they can be applied to arbitrary statements as well as labels;
> > this is most likely to be useful for m
On 11/12/18 7:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 21:13 +, Mike Gulick wrote:
>> On 11/2/18 5:04 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 11:56 -0400, Mike Gulick wrote:
2017-10-31 Mike Gulick
PR preprocessor/83173
* gcc/input.c (dump_locat
On 11/13/18 12:15 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Enabling in Glibc the recent enhancement to detect attribute
> mismatches in alias declarations (PR 81824) revealed a use
> case where aliases are being declared for targets declared
> with the always_inline attribute. Copying the always_inline
> attribu
Revision r266072 breaks bootstrap on darwin:
In file included from ../../work/gcc/coretypes.h:430,
from ../../work/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c:24:
../../work/gcc/poly-int.h: In instantiation of 'typename if_nonpoly::type maybe_lt(const Ca&, const poly_int_pod&) [with unsigned int
N
On 2018-11-12 12:50 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-11-02 1:59 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> I came across this typo and also added a similar ld invocation for
>> illustration purposes as mentioned by Jakub on irc.
>>
>
> After talking to Jakub about it, I went with different termin
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Attached is the patch for new -flive-patching=[inline-only-static |
> inline-clone] master option.
>
> '-flive-patching=LEVEL'
> Control GCC's optimizations to provide a safe compilation for
> live-patching. Provides multiple-level
Enabling in Glibc the recent enhancement to detect attribute
mismatches in alias declarations (PR 81824) revealed a use
case where aliases are being declared for targets declared
with the always_inline attribute. Copying the always_inline
attribute to the declaration of the alias would then trigg
On 11/13/18 12:49 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/13/18 5:38 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On 11/13/18 2:53 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> Superfluous semi-colon. Given that the function returns an operand, its
>>> name
>>> is IMO misleading, so maybe [get_]operand_for_simple_move_operator.
>>
On 11/13/18 5:38 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 11/13/18 2:53 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> +static rtx
>>> +simple_move_operator (rtx x)
>>> +{
>>> + /* A word sized rotate of a register pair is equivalent to swapping
>>> + the registers in the register pair. */
>>> + if (GET_CODE (x) == ROTA
On November 13, 2018 5:40:59 PM GMT+01:00, Aldy Hernandez
wrote:
>With your cleanups, the main raison d'etre for my patch goes away, but
>here is the promised removal of ignore_equivs_equal_p.
>
>I think the == operator is a bit confusing, and equality intent should
>be clearly specified. I am
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 17:58 +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 09/11/18 21:00, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 11/9/18 10:51 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > One of the concerns noted at Cauldron about -fsave-optimization-
> > > record
> > > was the size of the output files.
> > >
> > > This fi
On 11/13/18 12:06 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> As far as I expect, Darwin should be untouched by this - we have a separate
> assembler (which doesn’t even respond to -many), so unless there’s some
> higher level translation done (it’s not mentioned in any Darwin specs), we
> should just carry on as
On November 13, 2018 7:09:15 PM GMT+01:00, Andi Kleen
wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 09:03:52AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > I even had an earlier version of this that instrumented
>> > assembler output of the compiler with PTWRITE in a separate script,
>> > and it worked fine too.
>>
>> A
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 17:58 +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 09/11/18 21:00, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 11/9/18 10:51 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > One of the concerns noted at Cauldron about -fsave-optimization-
> > > record
> > > was the size of the output files.
> > >
> > > This fi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 09:03:52AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I even had an earlier version of this that instrumented
> > assembler output of the compiler with PTWRITE in a separate script,
> > and it worked fine too.
>
> Apart from eventually messing up branch range restrictions I guess ;)
Hi Folks,
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 17:48, Peter Bergner wrote:
>
> On 11/13/18 5:17 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:34:34PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 12, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
O
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Would restricting it to flag_unsafe_math_optimizations not be enough in
> this case? Since if it's only done for unsafe math then you likely won't
> care about a small loss in precision anyway?
We have what should be the right logic (modulo DFP issu
Hi David,
On 09/11/18 21:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/9/18 10:51 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> One of the concerns noted at Cauldron about -fsave-optimization-record
> was the size of the output files.
>
> This file implements compression of the -fsave-optimization-record
> output, using zlib.
>
> I d
Hi,
Attached is the patch for new -flive-patching=[inline-only-static |
inline-clone] master option.
'-flive-patching=LEVEL'
Control GCC's optimizations to provide a safe compilation for
live-patching. Provides multiple-level control on how many of the
optimizations are enabled
On 11/13/18 5:17 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:34:34PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Nov 12, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> On darwin, we (darwin, as a platform decision) like all instructions
>
PR87870 shows a problem loading simple constant values into TImode variables.
This is a regression ever since VSX was added and we started using the
vsx_mov_64bit pattern. We still get the correct code on trunk if we
compile with -mno-vsx, since we fall back to using the older mov_ppc64
move patte
With your cleanups, the main raison d'etre for my patch goes away, but
here is the promised removal of ignore_equivs_equal_p.
I think the == operator is a bit confusing, and equality intent should
be clearly specified. I am providing the following for the derived
class (with no hidden default
Hi Joseph,
> What types exactly is this meant to apply to? Floating-point? Integer?
> Mixtures of those? (I'm guessing not mixtures, because those would be
> something other than "convert" here.)
Originally I had it for both Floating-point and Integer, but not a mix of the
two.
> For inte
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:51 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > Reworking gnattools build to always use host CC/CXX in "stage1" (or for
> > crosses)
> > rather than doing sth different.
>
> > Yeah, but gnattools is bootstrapped, right?
>
> No, it's not bui
On 11/13/18 2:53 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> +static rtx
>> +simple_move_operator (rtx x)
>> +{
>> + /* A word sized rotate of a register pair is equivalent to swapping
>> + the registers in the register pair. */
>> + if (GET_CODE (x) == ROTATE
>> + && GET_MODE (x) == twice_word_mode
>>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This PR shows we have stale reduction groups lying around because
> the fixup doesn't work reliably with reduction chains. Fixed by
> delaying the build to after detection is successful.
>
> Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
On 11/13/18 9:01 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
> I could verify that, your patch fixes all the ICEs I saw with
> arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain!
> There are some differences on the test results, because I compare the latest
> results with something which is old.
>
> I haven't test it on bare-metal toolcha
On Nov 13, 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
> Reworking gnattools build to always use host CC/CXX in "stage1" (or for
> crosses)
> rather than doing sth different.
> Yeah, but gnattools is bootstrapped, right?
No, it's not built in stage1, it's a post-bootstrap host subpackage.
> For --disable-boo
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:49:55AM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> the following patch fix the subjected issue
>
> Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
> ===
> --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 266026)
> +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working
On 11/13/18 4:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> 2018-11-13 Martin Liska
>>
>> * pr87930.c: Move from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/
>> into gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/.
>
> * gcc.target/i386/pr87930.c: Move to ...
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> 2018-11-13 Martin Liska
>
> * pr87930.c: Move from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/
> into gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/.
* gcc.target/i386/pr87930.c: Move to ...
* gcc.dg/asan/pr87930.c: ... here. Guard fo
On 11/13/18 4:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:01:56PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 11/12/18 1:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:03:41PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
The patch reject usage of the mentioned options.
Ready for trunk?
>
Hi,
This adds filters for upstream dmd, druntime, and phobos libraries, so
that the update-copyright script doesn't complain or try to update the
copyright years for those files.
OK for trunk?
--
Iain
---
contrib/ChangeLog:
2018-11-13 Iain Buclaw
* update-copyright.py (TestsuiteFil
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:01:56PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/12/18 1:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:03:41PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> The patch reject usage of the mentioned options.
> >>
> >> Ready for trunk?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> gcc/ChangeL
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:43 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/13/18 3:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:50 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >> I have rebased my value_range dumping patch after your value_range_base
> >> changes.
> >>
> >> I know you are not a fan of
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This patch fixes PR84648 by adjusting exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> cases.
> It only handles simple cases in which IV.base are constants because we rely on
> current niter analyzer which doesn't handle parameterized bound in wrapp
On 11/12/18 1:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:03:41PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> The patch reject usage of the mentioned options.
>>
>> Ready for trunk?
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2018-11-12 Martin Liska
>>
>> PR sanitizer/87930
>> * con
Hi Peter,
I could verify that, your patch fixes all the ICEs I saw with
arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain!
There are some differences on the test results, because I compare the latest
results with something which is old.
I haven't test it on bare-metal toolchain yet. But will do to ensure all
rel
* Claudiu Zissulescu [2018-11-12 13:29:33 +0200]:
> From: claziss
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> This is a patch which fixes and sets LRA by default.
>
> OK to apply?
> Claudiu
>
> Commit message
>
> LP_COUNT register cannot be freely allocated by the compiler as it
> size, and/or content ma
Hi James
On 07/11/18 15:36, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 01:38:46PM -0500, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This patch is part of a series that enables ARMv8.5-A in GCC and
>> adds Branch Target Identification Mechanism.
>> (https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/cpu
Hi
On 02/11/18 18:38, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch is part of a series that enables ARMv8.5-A in GCC and
> adds Branch Target Identification Mechanism.
> (https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/cpu-architecture/a-profile/exploration-tools)
>
> This patch adds a new pass cal
Hi James
On 07/11/18 15:16, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 01:37:33PM -0500, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This patch is part of a series that enables ARMv8.5-A in GCC and
>> adds Branch Target Identification Mechanism.
>> (https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/cpu
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:58 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> This patch implements a -fdiagnostics-format=json option which
> converts the diagnostics to be output to stderr in a JSON format;
> see the documentation in invoke.texi.
>
> Logically-related diagnostics are nested at the JSON level, using
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:05 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The patch is based on what was discussed on IRC and in the PR.
> Apart from that the reported layout is improved.
>
> Patch survives regression tests on x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
> Ready for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Martin
>
> gcc/Ch
On 11/13/18 3:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:50 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I have rebased my value_range dumping patch after your value_range_base
changes.
I know you are not a fan of the gimple-pretty-print.c chunk, but I still
think having one set of dumping code is
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:10 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >> Please let me know if there are objections to this change in the next
> >> few days, e.g., if enabling C and C++ for an Ada-only build is too
> >> onerous. It is certainly possible to rework
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/18 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Kyrill Tkachov
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> On 13/11/18 08:24, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:20 PM Kyrill Tkachov
> >>> wrot
On 11/13/18 8:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 11/13/18 3:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
The tricky part starts in the prologue for
if (vr0->undefined_p ())
{
vr0->deep_copy (vr1);
On 11/13/18 5:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> [[likely]] and [[unlikely]] are equivalent to the GNU hot/cold attributes,
> except that they can be applied to arbitrary statements as well as labels;
> this is most likely to be useful for marking if/else branches as likely or
> unlikely. Conveniently,
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 7:24 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:44 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On 10/25/18, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:48 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 10/25/18, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:07 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On 13/11/18 09:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs because the predicate and constraints on one of
the operands of @aarch64_compare_and_swapdi aren't consistent. The RA which
goes according to constraints
(insn 15 13 16 2 (set (reg:DI 104)
(const_int 8589
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 11/13/18 3:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > The tricky part starts in the prologue for
> > > > >
> > > > > if (vr0->undefined_p ())
> > > > > {
> > > > > vr0->deep_co
This PR shows we have stale reduction groups lying around because
the fixup doesn't work reliably with reduction chains. Fixed by
delaying the build to after detection is successful.
Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tre
Hi,
The dwz tool attempts to optimize DWARF debugging information contained in ELF
shared libraries and ELF executables for size.
With the dwz -m option, it attempts to optimize by moving DWARF debugging
information entries (DIEs), strings and macro descriptions duplicated in
more than one object
On 11/13/18 3:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
The tricky part starts in the prologue for
if (vr0->undefined_p ())
{
vr0->deep_copy (vr1);
return;
}
but yes, we probably can factor out a bit more common code
here. I'll
On Nov 13, 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Please let me know if there are objections to this change in the next
>> few days, e.g., if enabling C and C++ for an Ada-only build is too
>> onerous. It is certainly possible to rework gnattools build machinery
>> so that it uses CC and CXX as detected
Do not look at constant or external defs in reduction stmts to
determine the reduction PHI vector type. Those are promoted/demoted
as required.
This is another fragile area, I'll poke around a bit but nevertheless,
bootstrap & regtest queued.
Richard.
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR
We need to restrict what we handle as last operation in a nested
cycle because vectorizable_reduction performs the code-generation
in the end.
Boostrap and regtest in progress on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87931
* tree-
A simple omission...
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87967
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_transform_loop): Also copy PHIs
for constants for the scalar loop.
* g++.dg/opt/pr8796
The following better detects invalid nested cycles in particular
those part of an outer reduction.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87962
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_is_simple_reduction): Mor
Thank you for quick review. All the patches are pushed with the suggested mods.
Claudiu
From: Claudiu Zissulescu [claz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 12:25 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: francois.bed...@synopsys.com; andrew.burg...@embecos
Version 2.
Finally, the point of the previous patches in this series, support for
inline PLT calls, keyed off -fno-plt. This emits code using new
relocations that tie all insns in the sequence together, so that the
linker can edit the sequence back to a direct call should the call
target turn out
Version 2.
The current code handling __tls_get_addr calls for powerpc*-linux
generates a call then overwrites the call insn with a special
tls_{gd,ld}_{aix,sysv} pattern. It's done that way to support
!TARGET_TLS_MARKERS, where the arg setup insns need to be emitted
immediately before the branch
Version 2. (Same as before, here for completeness.)
This call arg is unused on rs6000.
* config/rs6000/darwin.md (call_indirect_nonlocal_darwin64),
(call_nonlocal_darwin64, call_value_indirect_nonlocal_darwin64),
(call_value_nonlocal_darwin64): Remove constraints from sec
Version 2.
There is really no need to define a TLSmode mode iterator that is
identical (since !TARGET_64BIT == TARGET_32BIT) to the much used P
mode iterator. It's nonsense to think we might ever want to support
32-bit TLS on 64-bit or vice versa! The patch also fixes a minor
error in the call m
Version 2.
Like the last patch for external calls, now handle most assembly code
for indirect calls in one place. The patch also merges some insns,
correcting some !rs6000_speculate_indirect_jumps cases branching to
LR, which don't require a speculation barrier.
* config/rs6000/rs6000-pr
Version 2.
This is a first step in tidying rs6000 call patterns, in preparation
to support inline plt calls.
* config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h (rs6000_call_template): Declare.
(rs6000_sibcall_template): Declare.
(macho_call_template): Rename from output_call.
* confi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:16:09PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> REGs are unique. This patch recognizes that fact, speeding up rs6000
> gcc infinitesimally. Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64le-linux. OK?
Of course, fine for trunk. Thanks!
Segher
> * gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_legitima
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:53:20PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> For -mcmodel=medium we can use toc-relative addressing to access
> constants placed in read-only data, which is better since they can be
> merged when in .rodata.cst8.
>
> Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64le-linux. OK?
Okay, thanks!
Seghe
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:34:34PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > >
> > > For people developing new code, it's the right way to go, and
> > > especially so for people working on gcc itse
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
