On 05/08/2018 09:14 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
with lto, incremental linking can be meaninfuly done in three ways:
1) read LTO file and produce non-LTO .o file
this is current behaviour of gcc -r or ld -r with plugin
2) read LTO files and merge section for later LTO
this is current
Ping.
Anything else to do for this?
Thanks.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 17:22, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 15/06/18 15:30, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As suggested in [1], the attached patch removes all definitions and
> > uses of __ARM_ARCH__ and uses __ARM_ARCH instead. The later is indeed
> > defined by the preprocess
On 06/15/2018 11:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
C++20 adds a header, which should define all the library
feature test macros, as well as implementation-specific macros like
_GLIBCXX_RELEASE and __GLIBCXX__.
We should decide whether to implement by simply including
and then adding the feature t
> Looks good to me. Rather than removing dwarf2/pr37726.c can you try
> turning that into a guality test that verifies the debug experience is the
> same (or better) than before? I realize guality stuff is fragile but you
> can restrict it to -O0 if you like (not sure if dg-skip-if supports that)
