Whoops, hi Damian,
sorry for my late reply. I just saw your mail. I am still hanging ~2000
Fortran-Mailinglist mails back and because you copied the mailing list, your
mail got filtered to the mailing list folder and I didn't see it in the vast
number or unread mails.
> Thanks for your latest wor
On 04/07/2018 05:43 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
I committed r259020 to fix a couple of typos in the documentation
of the -Wrestrict option. The diff is below for reference.
-The @option{-Wrestrict} is included in @option{-Wall}.
+The @option{-Wrestrict}
While updating the -Wrestrict option to mention that it works
best not just with -O2 but also at higher optimization levels
I looked around for other options that might benefit from
a similar clarification. I found a few inlining options that
only mention -O2 but that (according to -Q --help=opti
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 12:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> wrong-code bugs qualify for stage4 if a fix isn't too invasive. Target
>> maintainers have an extra say to override stage4 rules anyway and for
>> non-primary/secondary targets nobody cares anyway.
> Maybe
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> I seem to have a writer's block right now, or I would have proposed
>> a full alternative, but hope the above gives you an indication?
> Thanks for your review!
>
> I committed the other parts and rewrote this one along your
> suggested wording. See at
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>> I struggled a bit parsing the item DWARF debug information
>> improvements.
>> Are you fine with the proposed change below?
> Sure! Go ahead.
Thanks!
Before committing I read it again and simplified a bit. Below the
final version.
Gerald
Index: cha
Hi all,
attached patch fixes (to my knowledge) the two PRs 81773 and 83606 where the
result of a coarray get() operation is assigned to an array using a vector as
index. It took me quite long to get it right, because I had to use the
scalarizer which I haven't use directly before. So reviewers wi
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180401.sv.po',
