On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:13:36PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/28/18 4:13 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >> On 3/28/18 12:59 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> It should be something like
> >>>
> >>> +error ("builtin fu
On 3/28/18 4:13 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On 3/28/18 12:59 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> It should be something like
>>>
>>> +error ("builtin function %qs requires the %qs (or newer), and "
>>>"%qs or %qs option
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/28/18 12:59 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > It should be something like
> >
> > +error ("builtin function %qs requires the %qs (or newer), and "
> >"%qs or %qs options",
> > + name, "-mcpu=power7", "-m64", "-m
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:51:09AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-03-20 Carl Love
>
> Reverting patch:
> 2017-09-27 Carl Love
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def: Remove macro expansion for
> FCTIW and FCTID. Remove macro definition B
As of r256448, the C++ frontend underlines many bad arguments in its
diagnostics; those where perform_overload_resolution returns a
non-NULL candidate, but there's a failure in convert_like_real.
However, for the case where perform_overload_resolution fails, but
there's a single non-viable candida
This followup patch updates the specific error-handling path
to add a note showing the pertinent parameter decl, taking
the output from:
test.cc: In function 'void caller(const char*)':
test.cc:6:14: error: cannot convert 'const char*' to 'const char**' for
argument '2' to 'void callee(int, const
Hi!
When looking at PR85090, I've looked into tmp-mddump.md and noticed there
some instructions that can't assemble - vblendmd etc., there is only
vpblendmd or vblendmps. I couldn't make a testcase that would reproduce
this though, seems the masked *mov_internal is used instead.
Bootstrapped/reg
Hi!
With the introduction of DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT/-gstatement-frontiers on by
default, the -Wduplicated-branches warning doesn't work anymore with -g,
because operand_equal_p in OEP_LEXICOGRAPHIC mode doesn't consider
DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs as equal unless they are pointer equal. For the warning
we either
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Seems like cp_fold should update CALL_EXPR_FN with "callee" if non-null.
>>>
On 3/28/18 12:59 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> It should be something like
>
> +error ("builtin function %qs requires the %qs (or newer), and "
> "%qs or %qs options",
> +name, "-mcpu=power7", "-m64", "-mpowerpc64");
>
> I don't see other such strings that quote incorrectly
GCC Maintainers:
The following patch reverts commit 253238 to add support for the fctid
and fctiw builtins for Steve Munroe.
gcc/Chan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/linux.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/linux.c
> @@ -37,3 +37,24 @@ linux_libc_has_function (enum function_class fn_class)
>
>return false;
> }
> +
> +/* This hook determines whether a function from libc has a fast
> imple
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> + /* Concepts allows 'auto' in template arguments, even multiple
>>> + 'auto's in a single argument.
>
>> I think that's only inte
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:38:49AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/27/18 5:02 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> @@ -15952,6 +15953,10 @@ rs6000_invalid_builtin (enum rs6000_buil
> >> name);
> >>else if ((fnmask & RS6000_BTM_FLOAT128) != 0)
> >> error ("builtin function %qs requir
On 03/28/2018 04:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
2018-03-14 Martin Liska
PR middle-end/81657
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_memory_copy_args): Handle situation
when libc library provides a fast mempcpy implementa
Hi Thomas,
If I am not mistaken, the patch causes:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr71935.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6
On 3/27/18 5:02 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> @@ -15952,6 +15953,10 @@ rs6000_invalid_builtin (enum rs6000_buil
>> name);
>>else if ((fnmask & RS6000_BTM_FLOAT128) != 0)
>> error ("builtin function %qs requires the %qs option", name,
>> "-mfloat128");
>> + else if ((fnmask & (
Dear Friends,
I am Mr. Aaron from FullyGold Holdings, we can provide high-end PCBs(Printed
Circuit Boards) to our customer side.
Specialize in mulitlayer(4L~50L) PCB fields more than 13 years, also including
rigid, rigid-flex, FPC, and hybrid lam., and high performance PCB, our many
clients
CANNABINOID THERAPEUTICS SYMPOSIUM
June 6 - 7, 2018 | Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach & Marina Hotel | Redondo Beach, CA
---
SIGN UP TODAY:
http://links.infocastevents.mkt8115.com/ctt?kn=5&ms=MzM2NTI0NzUS1&r=NjkyMTk1NzM3MTk0S0&b=2&j=MTI0MzQyNDM2NgS2&mt=1&rt=0
---
Join the evolving conversation arou
On 03/20/2018 04:49 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 03/20/2018 04:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
There's patch for couple of documentation issues reported in the PR.
Looks good to me, thanks!
Just, should there be an "a" in "use jump table"?
Looks good. An
On 03/28/2018 04:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:14:45PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
I'm sending Jakub's patch, where I removed the guard in asan_poison_variable.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-0
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:46:52AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > +/* Return true if pow(cst, x) should be optimized into exp(log(cst) * x).
> > */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +optimize_pow_to_exp (tree arg0, tree arg1)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> So instead of this simply guard the
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > --- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj 2018-03-27 12:54:54.685244368 +0200
> > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md 2018-03-27 19:38:43.891451026 +0200
> > @@ -6854,6 +6854,23 @@ (define_insn "add3_carry"
> > (set_attr "pent_pair" "pu")
> >
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> 2018-03-14 Martin Liska
>
> PR middle-end/81657
> * builtins.c (expand_builtin_memory_copy_args): Handle situation
> when libc library provides a fast mempcpy implementation/
> * config/i386/i386-protos.h (g
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> Hi Richard.
>>>
>>> As discussed in the PR, the problem here is that we have two different
>>> iterations of an IV live
OK.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I said in the audit trail, in its way this error recovery issue is
> somewhat interesting: Jason's r251422 added some code at the beginning of
> tsubst_default_argument, included the gcc_assert that triggers here. In
> fact, p
On 03/21/2018 11:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
The variable is not named very well, shouldn't it be avoid_libcall or
something similar? Perhaps the variable should have a comment describing
what it is. Do you need separate argument fo
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:14:45PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm sending Jakub's patch, where I removed the guard in asan_poison_variable.
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Martin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-03-28 Jakub Jelinek
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> > --- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj 2018-03-27 12:54:54.685244368 +0200
>> > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md 2018-03-27 19:38:43.891451026 +0200
>> > @@ -6854,6 +6854,23 @@ (define
Hi.
I'm sending Jakub's patch, where I removed the guard in asan_poison_variable.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-03-28 Jakub Jelinek
Martin Liska
PR sanitizer/85081
* gimplify.c (asan_poiso
Hi
This patch is a request to backport r258777 and r258805 to gcc-7-branch
and gcc-6-branch. The same ICE occurs in both the branches with
-fstack-check. Thus the test case directive has been changed.
The discussion on the patch that went into trunk is:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:46:52AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > +/* Return true if pow(cst, x) should be optimized into exp(log(cst) *
> > > x). */
> > > +
> > > +static bool
> > > +optimize_pow_to_exp (tree arg0, tree arg1)
> > > +{
> > > + ret
On 03/28/2018 03:43 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
OK for stage4 trunk.
Can I backport this patch to GCC 6 and 7?
Yes please.
Thanks,
- Tom
On 03/27/2018 01:17 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 11:57 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> As noted in PR85056, the nvptx BE isn't declaring external arrays using
>> PTX array notation. Specifically, it's emitting code that's missing the
>> empty angle brackets '[]'.
>
> [ FYI, see https:/
Hi,
as I said in the audit trail, in its way this error recovery issue is
somewhat interesting: Jason's r251422 added some code at the beginning
of tsubst_default_argument, included the gcc_assert that triggers here.
In fact, parmtype is only used in the assertion thus the error recovery
chec
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 03:18:12PM +, Peryt, Sebastian wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Gentle ping.
Ok for 7.4.
> > > 2018-03-22 Sebastian Peryt
> > >
> > > gcc:
> > > PR84783
> > > * config/i386/avx512vlintrin.h (_mm256_permutexvar_epi64)
> > > (_mm256_permutexvar_epi32, _mm256_permutex_epi64)
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:31:38AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Ok, so should we make the set of cum->bnds_in_bt based on
> flag_check_pointer_bounds flag?
>
> If so, I've got patch that I've tested on my x86_64-linux-gnu machin.
>
> Martin
> >From 7b5978e61305c5098a084c2352fcbacb4c347158 Mon S
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Hi Richard.
>>
>> As discussed in the PR, the problem here is that we have two different
>> iterations of an IV live outside of a loop. This inhibits us from using
>> autoinc/dec ad
Hi
On 20/03/18 10:57, Sudakshina Das wrote:
Hi
On 20/03/18 08:13, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 19 March 2018 at 19:55, Sudakshina Das wrote:
Hi
On 19/03/18 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:57:46AM +, Sudi Das wrote:
Hi
This patch fixes the inconsistent behavi
On Mar 23, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> + /* Concepts allows 'auto' in template arguments, even multiple
>> + 'auto's in a single argument.
> I think that's only intended for class templates;
Aah, that explains a lot! Dang, it wa
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, sw_absorption.fppized.f90 relies on pow in
> x = log10 (something) - y;
> for (...)
> {
> x = x + y;
> z = pow (10.0, x);
> }
> where x + y in the first iteration is exactly -3 to be >= 0.001,
> unfortunately
42 matches
Mail list logo
