On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 6:19 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:13:52PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> AIX 7.1 minimum hardware is Power6. This patch changes TARGET_DEFAULT
>> to ISA 2.05.
>
>> #undef TARGET_DEFAULT
>> -#define TARGET_DEFAULT (MASK_PPC_GPO
When -mfunction-return= is used, simple_return_pop_internal should pop
return address into ECX register, adjust stack by bytes to pop from stack
and jump to the return thunk via ECX register.
Tested on i686 and x86-64.
PR target/r84530
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_output_indi
Attached is an updated patch with a fix for a bad assumption
exposed by building the linux kernel.
On 02/19/2018 07:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR 84468 points out a false positive in -Wstringop-truncation
in code like this:
struct A { char a[4]; };
void f (struct A *p, const struct A *q)
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:13:52PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX 7.1 minimum hardware is Power6. This patch changes TARGET_DEFAULT
> to ISA 2.05.
> #undef TARGET_DEFAULT
> -#define TARGET_DEFAULT (MASK_PPC_GPOPT | MASK_PPC_GFXOPT | MASK_MFCRF)
> +#define TARGET_DEFAULT ISA_2_5_M
On 02/24/2018 12:04 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes a 7/8 regression with SELECT TYPE where
the constant had the wrong type with -fdefault-integer-8.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk and gcc-7?
Regards
Thomas
2018-01-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes a 7/8 regression with SELECT TYPE where
the constant had the wrong type with -fdefault-integer-8.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk and gcc-7?
Regards
Thomas
2018-01-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78238
* gfortran.h (gfc_integer_4_k
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>> The reason you do not see .sig files on our netgull.com mirror is
>> that it mirrors gcc.gnu.org, which does not carry those, whereas
>> ftp.gnu.org and hence its mirrors has them.
>>
>> Richi, Jakub, can you also add those .sig files to the copies on
>>
On 02/24/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Sebor writes:
On 02/23/2018 01:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:57:14PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ /* get_inner_reference is not expected to return null. */
+ gcc_assert (base != NULL);
+
poly_int64 bytepos
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:46:28PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > This doesn't address any of my concerns that it is completely random
> > what {dst,src}ref->base is, apples and oranges; sometimes it is a pointer
> > (e.g. the argument of the function), sometimes the ADDR_EXPR operand,
> > sometime
Hi Steve,
The attached patch fixes PR fortran/30792. A substring
reference is invalid for a data-implied-do. Regression
tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit.
This should be safe enough, OK for trunk.
Thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
Anybody want to look at this?
It rebases identically on today's trunk. I'd like to commit it to
trunk and gcc-7-branch and gcc-6-branch ideally.
Thanks,
Roland
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> This fi
Martin Sebor writes:
> On 02/23/2018 01:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:57:14PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> + /* get_inner_reference is not expected to return null. */
>>> + gcc_assert (base != NULL);
>>> +
>>>poly_int64 bytepos = exact_div (bitpos, BITS_PER_UNI
12 matches
Mail list logo