Ping.
On 08/01/18 14:43, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Index: htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html 4 Aug 2
I've reworked the patch for PR83864. This bug is due to the compiler issuing
an internal error for code of the form on a little endian system:
int sb (_Float128 *p, unsigned long n) { return __builtin_signbit (p[n]); }
The problem is that the memory optimization wants to load the high double
Hello!
The default "go build" compile options over-optimize the auxiliary
executable, built in TestCrashDumpsAllThreads testcase
(libgo/go/runtime/crash_unix_test.go). This over-optimization results
in removal of the trivial summing loop and in the inlining of the
main.loop function into main.$thu
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 07:46:26AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
>
Hi David,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:27:42AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> > because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> > forme
On 2018-01-17 3:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
That deserves a warning in gcc-8/changes.html
Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/changes.html
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:49:47PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 01:11:28PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> >> PING
> >>
> >
> > Janne,
> >
> > I didn't see anything wrong with the patch. Other than Dominiq's
> >
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 01:11:28PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> PING
>>
>
> Janne,
>
> I didn't see anything wrong with the patch. Other than Dominiq's
> concerns about slow downs with -m32, I think it is fine.
Thanks, I guess that's an O
The following patch fixes a few test failures on hpux due to the limited
alignment of common.
Tested on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. Committed to trunk.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2018-01-21 John David Anglin
* gcc.dg/pr83621.c: Add -fno-common additional option on h
The attached change fixes the failure of
gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c on hppa-linux. Using
targetm.binds_local_p is less restrictive than TREE_PUBLIC in
determining what binds local.
Tested on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to trunk.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2
The HP linker for the hppa64-*-hpux* target lacks support for weak
undefined symbols. So,
we have a stub archive library to resolve various weak undefined
symbols. The attached change
adds a stub for the gnu_lto_v1 symbol. It is now needed for lto.
Tested on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. Committed t
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 01:11:28PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> PING
>
Janne,
I didn't see anything wrong with the patch. Other than Dominiq's
concerns about slow downs with -m32, I think it is fine.
I do wonder why you use gfc_charlen_t in some place and
HOST_WIDE_INT in other places as g
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 21:01:09 -0800
> Cc: DJ Delorie , gcc-patches ,
> gdb-patches
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 4:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 05:25:20 +0200
> >> From: Eli Zaretskii
> >> CC: sch...@linux-m68k.org, gcc-patches@gcc.g
Ximin Luo writes:
> -I to an absolute path is not that common for system / distro-built
> stuff.
Ok, thanks for clarifying.
> In the cases that it occurs, indeed it could and should be fixed
> by the package buildsystem, e.g. by stripping a prefix when they
> add -I flags to CFLAGS. But that's
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
> not.
Finishing testing the attached, OK for trunk?
2018-01-21 Ville Voutilainen
PR c++/83895
cp/
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don't diagnose extra parens
on typedefs.
testsuite/
* g++.dg/warn/83895.C: New.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 039ddd9..230e7dd 1
I use x86_64-apple-darwin17 and I run the test with -m32. Without the patch, a
plain compilation leads to four errors and a timing
0.011u 0.008s 0:00.02 50.0% 0+0k 0+0io 13pf+0w
With the patch I get the four errors plus "Result of LEN overflows its kind »
and a timing much slower
12.454u 2
Hi,
Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
not. Thus this test should be skipped for AIX.
Okay for trunk and po
Hi,
The following fixes PR 81485.
Tested with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim\{-m2/-
ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
Committed as r256930.
Cheers,
Oleg
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/81485
* config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_find_set_of_reg): Remove a
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Somehow I never managed to commit the attached patch.
> Better late than never.
Indeed! (And it looks nice, by the way.)
Gerald
PS: This is one reason why I usually recommend to add changes as
things make it into the tree, not wait until the end of stage
PING
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Dominique d'Humières
>> wrote:
>>> I have finally bootstrapped gfortran with the two patches applied and the
>>> spurious warnings with
21 matches
Mail list logo
