gcc/
PR libgcc/61152
* aarch64/rtems.h: Add GCC Runtime Library Exception. Format
changes.
* arm/rtems.h: Likewise.
* bfin/rtems.h: Likewise.
* i386/rtemself.h: Likewise.
* lm32/rtems.h: Likewise.
* m32c/rtems.h: Likewise.
*
On 07/21/2017 07:23 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've used your patch as the base and applied my changes on top. The
> attached patch is the result, so it is supposed to replace your
> version. It now also supports emitting a runtime loop.
>
> It bootstraps fine but unfortunately I see
I have committed the attached patch to remove checks for obsolete NetBSD
releases from the 1990s that do not provide __cxa_atexit.
Bootstrapped and tested on i386-unknown-netbsdelf6.1 and
x86_64-unknown-netbsd6.1.
/Krister
2017-07-23 Krister Walfridsson
* config.gcc (*-*-netbsd
On 07/23/2017 02:42 PM, Volker Reichelt wrote:
On 21 Jul, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/20/2017 10:35 AM, Volker Reichelt wrote:
Hi,
the following patch introduces a new C++ warning option
-Wduplicated-access-specifiers that warns about redundant
access-specifiers in classes, e.g.
class B
{
On 23 Jul, Eric Gallager wrote:
> On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
>> access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
>>
>> The main changes w.r.t. to the previous versions are:
>>
>> * The warning is
On 7/23/17, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
> access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
>
> The main changes w.r.t. to the previous versions are:
>
> * The warning is now a two-level warning with a slightly s
Hi again,
here is an updated patch for a new warning about redundant
access-specifiers. It takes Dave's various comments into account.
The main changes w.r.t. to the previous versions are:
* The warning is now a two-level warning with a slightly shorter name:
-Waccess-specifiers=1, -Waccess-sp
On 21 Jul, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 19:58 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> On 21 Jul, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 18:35 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> the following patch introduces a new C++ warning option
>> >> -Wduplicated-access-spec
On 21 Jul, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/20/2017 10:35 AM, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the following patch introduces a new C++ warning option
>> -Wduplicated-access-specifiers that warns about redundant
>> access-specifiers in classes, e.g.
>>
>> class B
>> {
>> public:
>> B();
On 07/23/2017 04:27 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> in PR 66102, I found a patch by Mikael which has never been applied.
> After dusting it off, finding that it looks reasonable and fixes
> the test case in question I'd like to apply this.
>
> Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
>
OK,
Hello world,
the attached test cases fixes a problematic invocation of
memcpy where src=NULL and n=0 by simply doing nothing
in the surrounding function if there is nothing to be done.
No test case, because this only shows up with a sanitized
libgfortran or under a debugger.
OK for trunk?
Rega
Hello,
this is a ping for that patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00022.html
Thanks.
Hi
Is it time now to consider this patch ?
* include/bits/stl_vector.h
(_Vector_impl_data): New.
(_Vector_impl): Inherit from latter.
(_Vertor_impl(_Vector_impl&&, _Tp_alloc_type&&)): New.
(_Vector_base(_Vector_base&&, const allocator_type&)): Use latter.
(_Vector_bas
Hi,
Alan added code to have GCC align the .toc section in GCC 7, aligning to
four bytes for 32-bit mode, and 8 bytes for 64-bit mode. This is normally
unnecessary since alignment of the .toc has historically been handled by
the standard linker script. However, people using non-standard toolchain
-static and -pie together behave differently depending on whether GCC is
configured with --enable-default-pie. On x86, "-static -pie" fails to
create executable when --enable-default-pie isn't used, but creates a
static executable when --enable-default-pie is used. This patch makes
-static comple
Am 21.07.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Alexander Monakov:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64, OK for trunk?
* interface.c (pair_cmp): Fix gfc_symbol comparison. Adjust comment.
OK.
Thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
Am 17.07.2017 um 00:31 schrieb Cesar Philippidis:
On 07/16/2017 10:28 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
It is possible to declare a pointer with the contiguous attribute.
Is there a reason that this cannot be used in general=
That's a good point. But some users don't want to modify their programs
mor
Hello world,
in PR 66102, I found a patch by Mikael which has never been applied.
After dusting it off, finding that it looks reasonable and fixes
the test case in question I'd like to apply this.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
2017-07-23 Thomas Koenig
Hello!
We have to prevent BMI, BMI2 and TBM instructions in -m16 mode.
2017-07-23 Uros Bizjak
PR target/80569
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Disable
BMI, BMI2 and TBM instructions for -m16.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-07-23 Uros Bizjak
PR target/8056
Hi Ian,
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:24 AM, REIX, Tony wrote:
>> Description:
>> * This patch enables libbacktrace to handle XCOFF on AIX.
>>
>> Tests:
>> * Fedora25/x86_64 + GCC v7.1.0 : Configure/Build: SUCCESS
>>- build made by means of a .spec file based on Fedora gcc-7.0.1-0.12
>> .spe
20 matches
Mail list logo
