On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> This is the 2nd of 3-5 patches to address pr78496.
>>
>> Jump threading will examine ASSERT_EXPRs as it walks the IL and record
>> information from those ASSERT_EXPRs into the available expre
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> This is the 2nd of 3-5 patches to address pr78496.
>
> Jump threading will examine ASSERT_EXPRs as it walks the IL and record
> information from those ASSERT_EXPRs into the available expression and
> const/copies tables where they're later used to
Hi,
the following patch fixes some wrong quoting that was introduced by
Martin's patch for PR translation/80280, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=247607
Consider the following testcase:
struct A {};
bool b = !A();
On trunk we currently get the following diagnostic:
b
On 05/05/2017 03:56 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 05/02/2017 05:40 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Right, and Wine people will tell, if something doesn't work for them.
So ok for me too.
Kai
Well, I haven't re-run these tests in a few months, but I got 272
failed wine tests with gcc 7.1 and 234 with my pat
On 05/06/2017 09:38 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
+simplify_assert_expr_using_ranges (gimple *stmt)
+{
+ return false;
I assume you didn't mean to leave that in?
No I didn't. I used to to extract the testcases. Ugh.
jeff
On 05/05/17 16:59, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 05/09/16 17:43, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> what do you think of this patch, is it OK (with the suggested wording)?
>>
>
> Bernd,
>
> Apologies, this seems to have fallen through a crack.
>
> I'm happy with this. Does it still
> +simplify_assert_expr_using_ranges (gimple *stmt)
> +{
> + return false;
I assume you didn't mean to leave that in?
Trev
Pinging this: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01325.html
On 3/24/17, Eric Gallager wrote:
> It seemed odd to me that gcc was issuing a warning about compatibility
> with traditional C that I couldn't turn off by pushing/popping
> -Wtraditional over the problem area, so I made the at
This is the 2nd of 3-5 patches to address pr78496.
Jump threading will examine ASSERT_EXPRs as it walks the IL and record
information from those ASSERT_EXPRs into the available expression and
const/copies tables where they're later used to simplify conditionals.
We're missing a couple things
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:38:21PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > There's first patch that just defines dump_flags_t as uint64_t and changes
> > all
> > corresponding interfaces that do use it. There's a problematic impact th
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-7.1.0.es.po', has just
On 2 May, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 04/29/2017 04:23 PM, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the following patch adds fix-it hints to the C++ parser for two wrongly
>> used keywords detected in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>>
>> OK for trunk
On 04/20/2017 11:54 AM, Prakhar Bahuguna wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/tls-disable-literal-pool.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/tls-disable-literal-pool.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..fe14a6b132c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/tls-disable-literal-
Hi,
this patchs adds an absolute line number comment in
gcc.target/avr/progmem-error-1.cpp.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add absolute line number comment in gcc.target/avr/progmem-error-1.cpp
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
* gcc.target/avr/progmem-error-1.cpp: Add abolute line number co
Hi,
this patch replaces absolute line numbers in gcc.target/powerpc.
Tested on ppc.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/powerpc
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/80557
* gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-macros.c: Replace absolute line numbers.
*
Hi,
this patch replaces absolute line numbers in gcc.target/spu.
Tested on spu.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/spu
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/80557
* gcc.target/spu/Wmain.c: Replace absolute line numbers.
* gcc.target/spu/intri
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, 5 May 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Fri, 5 May 2017, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> >> On 05.05.2017 13:04, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, 5 May 2017, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Applied this addendum to r247495
Hi,
this patch replaces absolute line numbers in gcc.target/arm.
Tested on arm.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/arm
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/80557
* gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c: Replace absolute line numbers.
---
gcc/testsuite/g
Hi,
this patch replaces absolute line numbers in gcc.target/aarch64.
Tested on aarch64.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Replace absolute line numbers in gcc.target/aarch64
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/80557
* gcc.target/aarch64/spellcheck_1.c: Replace absolute line numbers.
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The test-cases i386/avx-vtestp{d,s}* contain lines guarded with target
> default_packed, using absolute line numbers 150 and 164. The absolute line
> numbers intend to refer to the position of the packed attribute in unions
> ieee754_f
Hi,
this patch replaces absolute line numbers in g++.dg/{debug,goacc}.
Tested on x86_64.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
- Tom
Replace absolute line numbers in g++.dg/{debug,goacc}
2017-05-05 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/80557
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf2-1.C: Replace absolute line numbers.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 2017-04-18 Denys Vlasenko
>
> * config/i386/i386-common.c (ix86_handle_option): Remove support
> for obsolete -malign-loops, -malign-jumps and -malign-functions
> options.
> * config/i386/i386.opt: Likewise.
> Index: gcc/c
Hi,
The test-cases i386/avx-vtestp{d,s}* contain lines guarded with target
default_packed, using absolute line numbers 150 and 164. The absolute
line numbers intend to refer to the position of the packed attribute in
unions ieee754_float and ieee754_double in m128-check.h, but they do not
ma
2017-05-06 Uros Bizjak
* config/i386/i386.c (ext_80387_constant_init): Do not explicitly
initialize to zero.
(init_regs): Remove declaration.
(function_arg_advance_32): Initialize error_p as boolean variable.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Committed to
24 matches
Mail list logo
