Committed.
Richard.
2017-02-28 Richard Biener
* gcc-7/changes.html: Fix double value, adjust -Wstringop-overflow
default.
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html,v
retrieving
>From the GCC documentation under /onlinedocs there is a link to
/onlinedocs/ld. That does not exist on gcc.gnu.org, so provide
a redirect to where it actually is available.
Committed.
Gerald
Index: .htaccess
===
RCS file: /cvs/gc
Gerald reminded me that it would be nice to add ira-select branch
description to svn.html.
Here is the patch I've committed.
Index: svn.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.215
diff -u -r1.215
On 02/27/2017 03:26 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Martin Reinecke wrote:
thanks for applying the patch!
Unfortunately I just noticed some mistakes in my wording :(
Currently the sentence says
"code [...] may run significantly slower [...] than they did [...]"
I'm not a native sp
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:20:48PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> This fixes float128 on BE and on 32-bit.
>
> The configure tests need to use -mabi=altivec for 32-bit, since it is
> not the default there. That also enables the "vector" keyword, used by
> the tests. To do this it temporarily
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> +Support for the > +
>> href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2016/09/12/deprecate-pcommit-instruction";>deprecated
>> +pcommit instruction has been removed.
> Could you please add the same statement for gcc-7 changes?
Hi Martin,
at first I was surprised to see two suggestions from -- until I
realized those came from the two (Martins) of you. ;-)
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Martin Jambor wrote:
> on top of your patch, I would like to propose the following. What do
> you think?
>
> Index: changes.html
>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this is updated patch. I tried to explain better the situation WRT
> incremental linking.
Thank you, Jan. I had a couple of editorial changes on top of
this, which I finally managed to commit. (See the patch below.)
And one question: "declaration linki
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Martin Reinecke wrote:
> thanks for applying the patch!
> Unfortunately I just noticed some mistakes in my wording :(
> Currently the sentence says
> "code [...] may run significantly slower [...] than they did [...]"
> I'm not a native speaker, but I guess it would be more cor
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Yes, it's generally the case that G_() is used whenever there's a
> > conditional expression for the msgid argument to a diagnostic function.
>
> So, is this ok for trunk? Shall I regenerate gcc.pot or will you?
OK. I'll regenerate gcc.pot in a fe
Hi
I had some problems when testing pretty printers while having
activated concept checks. I noticed that std::deque had already the
_SGIAssignableConcept check disable when using C++11 so I propose to
generalize to all usages of this concept check.
Additionally it avoids the defini
Dear All,
This bug resulted from a cock-up on my part. The mechanism for
suppressing .smod files depended on detecting the presence of a module
procedure by resetting a flag if the module_procedure attribute was
written. Of course, this didn't happen if the module procedure is
private, which rathe
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:47:09PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > > > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > > > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, i
2017-02-25 18:10 GMT+01:00 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>>> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
>>> 6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Changes" at
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > That was quite a bit; thanks for doing that, Jakub!
> >
> > In the patch below I try to streamline language a bit, document options
> > being implied by -Os (in addition to -O2
Hello,
this is patch is afairly straightforward conversion from use of a
vector indexed by edge->uid to use of the new call_summary from the
previous patch.
The patch is generally a cleanup, hashing is a nicer method of keeping
call-site related information than a gigantic vector that we never
sh
Hello,
this patch is an actual implementation of the call_summary class (I
hope the name is a good analogy to the function_summary we have, I am
opened to other suggestions). I have kept the implementation close to
the existing one of function-summary, there are I think only two
notable differenc
Hello,
when working on call summaries, I have found a weird function
ipa_update_after_lto_read which currently only makes sure that IPA-CP
function and edge summaries exist, at times when they already have to
exist.
So I did some digging in history and found out that originally the
function was m
Hello,
the patch sequence in this thread adds a call_summary class, which is
analogous to function_summary we already have but which gathers
information about call graph edges, rather than nodes.
The first patch implements the class itself, the second modifies
ipa-prop.[ch] and ipa-cp.c to use it
On 02/26/2017 07:21 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
That was quite a bit; thanks for doing that, Jakub!
In the patch below I try to streamline language a bit, document options
being implied by -Os (in addition to -O2 or higher), fix grammar in a few
places,
On 02/25/2017 03:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
In an arithmetic directive with the width or precision specified
by an argument to the asterisk (e.g., "%*x") and where the argument
range is unknown, for the purposes of the return value optimization
the pass must assume it's potentially as large as IN
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'gcc' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
http://translationproject.org/POT-files/gcc-
This patch, which is largely implemented by Chung-Lin, is a first step
towards teaching the c and c++ FEs how to allocate shared memory for
gang local variables. E.g.
#pragma acc parallel
{
int some_array[N], some_var;
Both some_array and some_var will be stored in shared memory with this
I am testing the following patch for another vectorizer issue with
address-space preserving.
Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2017-02-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79723
* tree-vect-stmts.c (get_vectype_for_scalar_type_and_size): Pre
> Oh, and you'll need to update the copyright headers to 2017 when you
> do eventually apply this, but everything else looks fine.
>
Forgot to commit this one, done in this commit r245759. Sorry for this,
Claudiu
You might think it doesn't matter, but it causes vim's "jump to matching
brace" feature to malfunction, leaving me a bit miffed.
Applying to trunk.
2017-02-27 Marek Polacek
* decl.c (expand_static_init): Add missing } in a comment.
diff --git gcc/cp/decl.c gcc/cp/decl.c
index 3dd1f5c
On 27 Feb, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> So here's the second attempt:
>>
>> 2017-02-27 Volker Reichelt
>>
>> * init.c: Include intl.h.
>> (build_new_1): Move message strings into pedwarn to make them
>> -Wformat-secur
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> So here's the second attempt:
>
> 2017-02-27 Volker Reichelt
>
> * init.c: Include intl.h.
> (build_new_1): Move message strings into pedwarn to make them
> -Wformat-security friendly. Mark string for translat
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, input_location), OPT_Wvla,
> > > typedef_variant_p (orig_type)
> >
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As analyzed in PR69564, inefficient code for runtime alias check is
>> generated in benchmark
>> scimark2. It is suspected vectorized loop doesn't run enough iterations to
>>
Don't try to use rand_s on CYGWIN
CYGWIN seems to include _mingw.h and thus __MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR is
defined even though rand_s is not available. Thus add an extra check
for __CYGWIN__.
Thanks to Tim Prince and Nightstrike for bringing this issue to my attention.
Committed as r245755.
2017-02
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> > This is not -Wformat-security friendly, perhaps better
> > pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (outer_nelts, input_location), OPT_Wvla,
> >typedef_variant_p (orig_type)
> >? "non-constant array new lengt
On 26 Feb, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:18:57PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> 2017-02-26 Volker Reichelt
>>
>> * init.c: Include intl.h
>
> Missing .
Indeed, I noticed that one after I hit the send button.
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include "varasm.h"
>> #include
On 27/02/17 10:09, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Tom!
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:19:37 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ was: r241221 [1/2] - in /branches/gomp-4_0-branch: ]
On 16/10/16 22:13, tschwi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
Author: tschwinge
Date: Sun Oct 16 20:13:18 2016
New Revision: 241221
URL: ht
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is a fix for PR 78140 which is about LTO WPA of Firefox taking
> 1GB memory more than gcc 6.
>
> It works by reusing the ipa_bits and value_range that we previously
> had directly in jump functions and which are just too big
Hi Tom!
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:19:37 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: r241221 [1/2] - in /branches/gomp-4_0-branch: ]
>
> On 16/10/16 22:13, tschwi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> > Author: tschwinge
> > Date: Sun Oct 16 20:13:18 2016
> > New Revision: 241221
> >
> > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/vie
On 2017-02-25 Sat 18:19 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I.e., after reading the above, I was wondering who'd do "abc" + 1.
>
> Of course, once I looked at your good additions to the testsuite,
> I realized that this is really more about "abc" + '1'. Technically
> the description is correct, since
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 03:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> Bug 79691 - -Wformat-truncation suppressed by (and only by) -Og
>>> points out that the gimple-ssa-sprintf pass doesn't run when
Somehow this one got lost on my end, until this morning.
Embarrassing. :-(
Still, since I had prepared it back then, and it was a real
change, committed now.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/c
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 16:28:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > LTO bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
> > >
> > > (most "gross" are still TS_LIST having a t
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:42:33AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On February 24, 2017 9:56:25 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> > wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >On the following testcase we replace a PLUS_EXPR (which is considered
> > >throwing with -fnon-c
41 matches
Mail list logo
