Hi,
These testcases use long for 64bit integer which means they will
fail with -mabi=ilp32 on aarch64. This reduces the number of failures
down for ILP32.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions
(including with a multi-lib for ilp32).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
testsui
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> > Possibly. Though then for FP we also want - abs (a) -> copysign (a, -1).
>>
>> I thought this might fix PR 62055, but at least on x86_64, we genera
> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the
> documentation.
>
> As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada
> front-en
On 10/06/16 16:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently C++ does not warn at all when built-in functions are
> re-defined with a different signature, while C does warn on that
> even without -Wall.
>
> Thus I'd like to propose a -Wall enabled warning for that in C++ only.
>
> Initially I tried
> Can this be refactored to avoid having to duplicate the whole file for
> every target?
I'm not sure, maybe entries could be omitted if they match the default though.
--
Eric Botcazou
The compiler was creating bogus CONST_VECTORs under specific circumstances in
sparc_expand_vector_init. Fixed by using the same test as the x86 back-end.
Tested on SPARC/Solaris, applied on all active branches.
2016-10-16 Eric Botcazou
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_expand_vector_in
> 2016-10-11 Eric Botcazou
>
> * tree.h (build_complex_type): Add second parameter with default.
> * tree.c (build_complex_type): Add NAMED second parameter and adjust
> recursive call. Create a TYPE_DECL only if NAMED is true.
> (build_common_tree_nodes): Pass true in
Forget it! It seems that I did not apply the patch!-(
Sorry for the noise.
Dominique
> Le 16 oct. 2016 à 18:42, Dominique d'Humières a écrit :
>
> Dear Jerry,
>
>> The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call
>> abort’. This seems consistent with your comment
>
> I
Dear Jerry,
> The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call abort’.
> This seems consistent with your comment
I have not been clear enough: I have to replace 64 with 16 even with your patch.
Dominique
On Okt 16 2016, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> * system-aix.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Change to False.
> * system-aix64.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Likewise.
> * system-hpux-ia64.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Likewise.
> * system-hpux.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Likewise.
>
It's not clear why this was set to True in some configuration files.
Applied on the mainline.
2016-10-16 Eric Botcazou
* system-aix.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Change to False.
* system-aix64.ads (Always_Compatible_Rep): Likewise.
* system-hpux-ia64.ads (Always_Compa
On 15/10/16 23:44 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 15 October 2016 at 22:44, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
2016-10-15 Ville Voutilainen
Make sure the return value of malloc_allocator::allocate
is zero-initialized so that checking it for non-zero works
later.
* include/ext/mallo
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 07:55:47AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Maybe rs6000 always should prefer inline save-restore when SWS is
>> enabled, except for optimize_size?
>
> Yes, that would be a good optimization probably.
>
> try_shrin
Found when looking at something else. find_array_ref_with_const_idx_r would
uselessly keep on looking for other array refs with constant indices, even
though finding one is enough. So return when something is found, instead of
just ignoring the subtrees.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, o
Dear Jerry,
The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call abort’.
This seems consistent with your comment
> The language seems a little obscure. I think the first sentence means
> don't expect inquire to use a UDDTIO procedure and the second sentence
> says when you use a
On 16 October 2016 at 11:29, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> After approval from Bernd Schmidt, I committed the patch to remove
> optab functions for
> sdivmod_optab and udivmod_optab in optabs.def, which removes the block
> for divmod patch.
>
> This patch is mostly the same as previous one, e
16 matches
Mail list logo