On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:06 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> Hi David, Segher, Aldy!
>>
>> Davids new selftest code found something for the rs6000-ibm-aix4.3
>> target, maybe you're interested:
>>
>> /home/jbglaw/src/toolchain/build/./gcc/x
On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers
> inappropriate FAIL.
> The patch below adds -fno-ident if a testcase contains one of
> scan-assembler, scan-assembler-not or scan-assembler-times.
Kinda gross. I'd
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:53:40PM +0200, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
>> Testresults for 5.4.0:
>> i386-pc-solaris2.11 (2)
>> i386-pc-solaris2.12 (2)
>> sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (2)
>> sparc-sun-solaris2.12 (2)
>>
> Updated patch with new entries
Hi,
ping...
As this discussion did not make any progress, I just attached
the latest version of my patch with the the changes that
Vladimir proposed.
Boot-strapped and reg-tested again on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Is it OK for the trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
On 06/10/16 16:13, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 06
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:18:08AM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> Thanks for doing some of this tidying up. The patch is OK to commit on
> both trunk and 6-branch. It might be worth going back to 5-branch as
> well, if you feel up to it.
Applied to trunk as r237580 so far.
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for doing some of this tidying up. The patch is OK to commit on
both trunk and 6-branch. It might be worth going back to 5-branch as
well, if you feel up to it.
Cheers
Paul
On 18 June 2016 at 21:47, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On December 1, 2015 1:54:58 PM
