On 03/05/2016 01:02 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
The problem is that we are emitting copy sequences to edges without caring
for deferred popping of arguments. Thus when we began emitting code for
the
first block, which in this case starts with a label, we had 32 bytes of
pending stack adjustment
On March 7, 2016 2:03:30 AM GMT+01:00, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Anton Blanchard pointed out that we don't currently execute the
>whole-vector-shift tests for PowerPC. I tested enabling them on
>powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, which resulted in 8 more test successes
>and no additional failures.
[adding Eric for review]
On 02.03.2016 00:42, Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
As time progresses, the ada-hurd.diff patch has now been living in Debian since
gcc-4.6 and is now in gcc-5 and gcc-6. Last try to get it included upstream was
in 2012, and 2014, e.g see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Andre Vieira (lists)
wrote:
> On 21/05/15 10:01, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi Sandra,
>>
>> On 21/05/15 06:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> This is another patch aimed at fixing bugs relating to trying to execute
>>> NEON code on a target that doesn't support it revea
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that we've moved to pragmas guarding the various intrinsics in
> arm_neon.h I think we should still
> throw a #error if someone tries to include the header while compiling for
> -mfloat-abi=soft.
>
> This gives a more helpful
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a followup to PR63304.
>
> As discussed in bugzilla, this patch disables pcrelative_literal_loads
> when -mfix-cortex-a53-843419 (or its default configure option) is
> used.
>
> I copied the behavior of -mfix-cortex-a53-8357
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 17 February 2016 at 11:05, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/02/16 10:03, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 February 2016 at 12:32, Kyrill Tkachov
>>> wrote:
On 04/02/16 08:58, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
> New patch that adds the predicate "reg_or_arm_rhs_operand" as suggested by
> Richard. Tested on all arm and thumb targets as before.
>
> Okay for trunk?
Missing comment on the predicate.
Ok, please queue this for GCC 7 with a comment adde
New patch that adds the predicate "reg_or_arm_rhs_operand" as suggested
by Richard. Tested on all arm and thumb targets as before.
Okay for trunk?
2016-03-07 Michael Collison
PR target/70008
* config/arm/predicates.md (reg_or_arm_rhs_operand): New predicate
that allows registers
GCC 4.9 had added support for C++ VLAs as specified in WG21
document N3639 expected to be included in C++ 14. However,
WG21 ultimately decided not to include N3639 in C++ 14 and
the G++ support was partially removed in 5.1. Unfortunately,
the removal rendered some safe albeit erroneous G++ 4.9 c
Hi,
Anton Blanchard pointed out that we don't currently execute the
whole-vector-shift tests for PowerPC. I tested enabling them on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, which resulted in 8 more test successes
and no additional failures. I still need to test this on big-endian.
Assuming no problems the
On 05.03.2016 19:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
When I went to apply my symbol versioning patch to upstream,
I discovered that upstream had already bumped their soname to
6.4.0, beyond the bump that I'd applied to gcc to 5.0.0.
So I bumped upstream to 7.0.0, including the symbol versioning,
and th
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attached patch prevents red-zone with -fPIC for leaf functions on
> i686. The idea is to mark when set_got is expanded as a call to a pc
> thunk, and use this flag to prevent red-zone in the current function.
>
> Please note that usin
Hello!
Attached patch prevents red-zone with -fPIC for leaf functions on
i686. The idea is to mark when set_got is expanded as a call to a pc
thunk, and use this flag to prevent red-zone in the current function.
Please note that using red-zone with i686 violates all known ABIs, but
some future AB
Dear All,
These are two rather trivial modifications to permit, 'module' to
appear at any position in the list of prefixes in the procedure
declaration and to allow module procedures to appear within a module
contains section. I was rather astonished at this latter since it does
seem to be rather
Hi, all!
I decided to start working on coroutines support in C++ (according to P0057R2
proposal: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0057r2.pdf).
I did some analysis of how other compilers implement coroutines:
https://github.com/miyuki-chan/coroutines
This github repo has a
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/08/2016 12:19 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> Here, we are calling template_class_depth on a FIELD_DECL corresponding
>> to a lambda that is used inside variable template. template_class_depth
>> however does not see that this FIELD_DECL
Hi,
In commit r233654, Christian introduced a new test: pragma_cpp_fma.
Unfortunately, this test fails when gcc is configured --with-fpu >=
neonvfpv4: __ARM_FEATURE_FMA is still defined after the last
pop_options.
To address this, I propose to simply force fpu=vfp via a pragma at the
beginning o
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-6.1-b20160131.sv.po',
19 matches
Mail list logo
