Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add plugin to recursively dump the source-ranges in a tree (v2)

2015-09-27 Thread Dodji Seketeli
David Malcolm a écrit: > This patch adds a test plugin that recurses down an expression tree, > printing diagnostics showing the ranges of each node in the tree. > > It corresponds to: > [PATCH 15/22] Add plugin to recursively dump the source-ranges in a tree > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pa

Re: [AArch64] Fix Prefetch ICE

2015-09-27 Thread Hurugalawadi, Naveen
Hi Marcus, Thanks for the review and comments. >> OK and can you back port to 5 ? Please find attached the backported patch on gcc-5-branch. Regression tested on AArch64 without any issues. 2015-09-28 Andrew Pinski ChangeLog * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (prefetch): Chan

RE: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Ajit Kumar Agarwal
-Original Message- From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:05 AM To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal Cc: Segher Boessenkool; GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized ch

Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 7:49 PM > To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal > Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida

[Graphite] Redesign Graphite scop detection

2015-09-27 Thread Aditya Kumar
From: hiraditya Redesign Graphite scop detection for faster compiler time and detecting more SCoPs. Existing algorithm for SCoP detection in graphite was based on dominator tree where a tree (CFG) traversal was required for analyzing an SESE. The tree traversal is linear in the number of basic

Re: [PATCH] Convert SPARC to LRA

2015-09-27 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/27/2015 01:57 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:41 PM, David Miller wrote: +#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_true Are we at the point there this should be the default, and old ports should just define to false, if they really n

Re: [PATCH] Convert SPARC to LRA

2015-09-27 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:41 PM, David Miller wrote: > > +#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_true > > Are we at the point there this should be the default, and old > ports should just define to false, if they really need to? I think no. For one, we don't have

RE: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On September 27, 2015 5:13:59 PM GMT+02:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: > > >-Original Message- >From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org] >Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 7:49 PM >To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal >Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli >H

Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On September 26, 2015 9:10:13 AM GMT+02:00, "Bin.Cheng" wrote: >On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal > wrote: >> SPEC CPU 2000 benchmarks are run and there is following impact on the >performance >> and code size. >> >> ratio with the optimization vs ratio without optimization fo

[PATCH, i386]: Merge *vec_extract_zext patterns

2015-09-27 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! Now that PR 57195 (Mode attributes with specific mode iterator can not be used as mode iterators in *.md files) [1] is fixed, we can merge *vec_extract_zext patterns. 2015-09-27 Uros Bizjak * config/i386/predicates.md (register_sse4nonimm_operand): New predicate. * config/i

Re: Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests

2015-09-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! > > OK for trunk? Ok. Jakub

Re: Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests

2015-09-27 Thread FX
> Hi! > Ping. OK for the Fortran part, though I suspect you need Jakub to approve it as well. FX

RE: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Ajit Kumar Agarwal
-Original Message- From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 7:49 PM To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes

Re: Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests

2015-09-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Ping. On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:53:52 +0200, I wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:56:00 +0200, I wrote: > > (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write > > to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does > > have the same ordering effect -- OK?) >

Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate register pressure cost.

2015-09-27 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 04:51:20AM +, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: > SPEC CPU 2000 benchmarks are run and there is following impact on the > performance > and code size. > > ratio with the optimization vs ratio without optimization for INT benchmarks > (3807.632 vs 3804.661) > > ratio with the

Re: [SH][committed] Fix PR 67391

2015-09-27 Thread Oleg Endo
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 21:04 +0900, Oleg Endo wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch fixes PR 67391. Some additional reg overlapping were > added to the addsi3 patterns while making LRA on SH work, but not all of > them seem to be good. Removing them, seems to be working just fine. > Tested on sh-el

Re: [patch] Enable lightweight checks with _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS.

2015-09-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 26/09/15 22:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/26/2015 09:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Would changes like this be suitable for _FORTIFY_SOURCE? diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex index 5e5ced1..074bf26 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mut