Oleg Endo wrote:
> Kaz, could you please check if the patch doesn't break anything on
> sh4-linux? If so, I'd like to commit this to trunk.
Build and test ok on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
Regards,
kaz
On 11/27/14 07:41, Chen Gang wrote:
> OK, I shall send related test case within two weeks (2014-12-10).
>
> Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>> The original length 18 is not enough for HOST_WIDE_INT printing, need
>> use 20 instead of.
>>
>> Also need additional
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 201
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
wrote:
> On 18
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
>>> wrote:
On 18 November 2014 at 08:34, Bin Cheng wrote:
> 201
Hi,
On 28 Nov 09:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > I found a bug here, have_{lto,offload} must be set if at least one file
> > contains
> > lto/offload sections, but currently they are overwritten by the last file.
> > Fix is bootstrapped and regtested on x86
Hi,
After the changes regarding the FPSCR handling, some SH test cases
started to fail. This fixes one of them. Tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp --target_board=sh-sim\{-m4/-ml}"
to verify that the test case passes again. Committed as r218472.
Cheers,
Oleg
gcc/testsuite/Chang
Hi,
This fixes an SH64 problem which was introduced in r185534 and went
unnoticed until recently. There, the extendqihi2 insn was converted to
an expander and the TARGET_SH1 condition was wrongly omitted. Tested
with 'make all-gcc' on sh-elf and sh64-elf. Committed on trunk as
r218469, on 4.9 a
On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 10:23 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> No. It is reasonable for the test suite to fail when the
> implementation of gcc is wrong (unclean) or newlib startup code is
> wrong (unclean). Since that is what happened, the fix is to fix the
> cleanliness problem.
>
> I’ve read through
On 11/08/2014 08:57 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
2014-11-08 Sandra Loosemore
Chris Jones
Joshua Conner
gcc/
* config/arm/unknown-elf.h (STARTFILE_SPEC): Add conditional
linking of crtfastmath.o.
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (STARTFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
On 1-Dec-14, at 11:57 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
Prior to reload (ie, in DSE1) there's a bit of magic in that we do
not set frame_read on call insns. That may in fact be wrong and
possibly the source of the problem.
/* This field is only used for the processing of const functions.
These funct
John David Anglin wrote:
The attached change fixes the fortran coarray tests on hpux. On hpux,
it is necessary to link directly against libatomic.
Tested on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Okay for trunk?
From the Fortran side, it looks okay.
Tobias
The attached change fixes the fortran coarray tests on hpux. On hpux,
it is necessary
to link directly against libatomic.
Tested on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Okay for trunk?
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2014-12-07 John David Anglin
P
The attached change fixes the fails of gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c and
gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-7.c
on hppa*-*-hpux*. Committed to trunk.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2014-12-07 John David Anglin
PR testsuite/64038
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c: Require c99_runtim
Hi Bernd,
On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 15:17 +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
>
> your checking from 2013-06-15 duplicated contents of the following files:
>
>
> ./gcc.target/h8300/pragma-isr2.c
> ./gcc.target/h8300/pragma-isr.c
> ./gcc.target/h8300/h8300.exp
>
>
> it is therefore unlikely
Hi Oleg,
your checking from 2013-06-15 duplicated contents of the following files:
./gcc.target/h8300/pragma-isr2.c
./gcc.target/h8300/pragma-isr.c
./gcc.target/h8300/h8300.exp
it is therefore unlikely that theses tests can work in the h8300 target.
svn log -r200117
--
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
>> wrote:
>>> On 18 November 2014 at 08:34, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>>
2014-11-18 Bin Cheng
* config/aarch64/aarch6
Ilya Enkovich writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> index 88435d6..9019ed8 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> @@ -10958,6 +10958,24 @@
> ;; Basic conditional jump instructions.
> ;; We ignore the overflow flag for signed
OK. But if we rename the function, why not simply terminal_width() ?
FX
> Le 6 déc. 2014 à 23:14, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
>
> This patch fixes a Fortran diagnostic "regression".
>
> With the current common diagnostic, the width shown with caret diagnostic is
> determined by:
>
>case OP
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
OK, this is then the final patch. Bootstrapped and regression tested
on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK to commit?
void
gfc_buffer_error (bool flag)
{
buffered_p = flag;
- pp_warning_buffer.flush_p = !flag;
+ buffered_p = flag;
}
Now there are two "buffered_p" …
Other
23 matches
Mail list logo
