Hi,
This patch is to enable GCC to accept new command line option
-mcpu=cortex-r7. Is it OK to trunk?
BR,
Terry
2013-02-25 Terry Guo
* config/arm/arm-cores.def: Added core cortex-r7.
* config/arm/arm-tune.md: Regenerated.
* config/arm/arm-tables.opt: Regenerated.
Ping
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:32
> To: 'Joseph Myers'
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR50293 - LTO plugin with space in path
>
> Joseph, Thanks for your valuable comments. See my reply and
Dear All,
The attached patch represents progress to date. It fixes the original
problem in this PR and allows John Reid's version of
iso_varying_string/vocabulary_word_count.f90 to compile and run
correctly. It even bootstraps and regtests!
However, it doe not fix:
PR51976 comment #6 and PR5155
Hi!
middle-end or back-end created aggregates don't have CLASS_TYPE_P bit set,
so build_zero_init_1 ICEs e.g. on va_list if it is array of structures.
Fixed by treating all RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE types that way, rather than
just CLASS_TYPE_P ones.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i6
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:42:44PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> 2013-02-22 H.J. Lu
>
> * bootstrap-asan.mk (POSTSTAGE1_LDFLAGS): Add
> -B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.
> diff --git a/config/bootstrap-asan.mk b/config/bootstrap-asan.mk
> index d37a9da..e3f34f5 100644
> ---
Richard Earnshaw [2013-02-20 11:00]:
> On 19/02/13 22:26, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> >I don't get why relaxing the restrictions for the
> >andsi3_compare0_scratch pattern results in a mismatch for the
> >zeroextractsi_compare0_scratch one.
> >
> >Any ideas?
>
> Because of the way combine works. It
On 12/02/2013 16:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This patch from Alan Modra fixes a section type conflict error. See also
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02172.html
The Windows part is OK. I ran the g++ testsuite (gcc/, not libstdc) with no
change before and after.
cheers,
2013/2/19 Georg-Johann Lay :
> CCing Richard in case this needs RM approval (I don't think so because the
> patch just changes ternary parts).
>
> Ping #1 for:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00579.html
>
>
> Georg-Johann Lay schrieb:
>>
>> And here 2/2 with the device -> arch mappin