This patch removes a "typedef" to make GCC bootstrappable with
--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx.
For some reason, only C and not C++ complains about the unused typedef
(cf. PR).
I considered using the typedef name, but that fails in C++, which does
not like the use of "d++" on an enum typ
Jim Meyering found a couple of typos by running "misspell-check" on GCC,
cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01910.html - Thanks for
doing so!
I have now corrected those typos in libgfortran and gcc/fortran - plus a
couple of more. (I have also changed "targetted" to "targeted" -
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> 2012-05-30 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR rtl-optimization/53519
> * combine.c (simplify_shift_const_1) : Use constm1_rtx
> instead of GEN_INT (GET_MODE_MASK (mode)) as second operand of XOR.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53519.c: New test.
OK, thanks.
Ri
Hi!
GEN_INT (GET_MODE_MASK (mode)) isn't canonical CONST_INT for mode,
because it is zero extended rather than sign-extended for GET_MODE_BITSIZE
(mode) < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT modes.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
2012-05-30 Jakub Jelinek
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 06:41:58 +0200
> > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:24:41 +0200
> > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:02:25 +0200
> >
> > Ping. I missed the PR number decoration on the ChangeLog entry:
> >
> >
On 29 May 2012 18:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i< nelt; i += diff)
>> + for (i = 0; i< nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
>> for (j = 0; j<= diff; j += 1)
>> - if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
>> - return false;
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> Now that we have a way of explicitly marking a variable as dead, we can use
>> that to indicate the end of a temporary's lifetime by adding it as a cleanup
>> for that temporary. Since gimpl
Hi,
On Sun, 27 May 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > people actually working on it and used to that style. We don't want to
> > have a mixture of several different styles in the compiler. I (and I
> > expect many others) don't want anyone working around the latter by going
> > over the whole so
On 5/29/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On May 25, 2012 Mike Stump wrote:
> > On May 25, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > Diego and I looked long and hard at this issue. It all came
> > > down to a sequence of problems. First, libstdc++ isn't rigged
> > > for GTY,
> >
> > If portabi
On 5/28/12, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > My main concern is that the precise collector we have in place
> > now requires substantial care to use. It is supported by a tool
> > that does not really understand C, let alone C++. We avoid the
> > problems when annotations are unnecessary. We can do tha
On 5/24/12, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On May 24, 2012 Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Add a type-safe hash table, typed_htab. Uses of this table
> > replace uses of libiberty's htab_t. The benefits include less
> > boiler-plate code, full type safety, and improved performance.
>
> Lawrence, is there
On May 29, 2012, at 5:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Running the following command spots over 1500 typos, and suggests fixes:
>
> $ git ls-files|misspellings -f -|grep -v '^ERROR:'|perl -pe \
> 's/^(.*?)\[(\d+)\]: (\w+) -> "(.*?)"$/sed -i '\''${2}s!$3!$4!'\'' $1/' > k
Hum, maybe a make rule (only
>>> Yes, I understand that's broken, but there are no consumers at this
>>> point that make any use of that offset. Would it be acceptable if we
>>> just put 0 there? (Given that I expect .debug_pub* to go away soon, I
>>> don't think it's worth the trouble of filling in the offset with
>>> anythin
.. Ah! I think I have a much better tentative fix, which, as it happens,
also leads to a diagnostics quite close to that produced by the EDG
front-end.
The idea is checking for the offending case and not handling it in any
special way besides turning need_new = 1, as if for a normal new
decla
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Sterling Augustine
wrote:
> This patch adds new flags and defines such that the C++ decl pretty printer
> prints both canonical dwarf names for decls without perturbing normal error
> message output.
>
> It addresses the issues with the earlier patches submitted as
As per libstdc++/52700, this fixes the configure bits for
libgfortran/libssp/libquadmath. With these fixes, I believe all the
libs are safe for --enable-symvers=gnu* variants.
Super simple patches...
I intend to put this on the 4.7 branch as well.
tested x86/linux
-benjamin
2012-05-29 Benjam
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Running the following command spots over 1500 typos, and suggests fixes:
>>
>> $ git ls-files|misspellings -f -|grep -v '^ERROR:'|perl -pe \
>> 's/^(.*?)\[(\d+)\]: (\w+) -> "(.*?)"$/sed -i '\''${2}s!$3!$4!'\'' $1/' > k
>
>
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:24:02 +0200
Ping...
> An old patch I finally came around to submit.
> Verified that the DVI and info output looks ok.
>
> Ok to commit with inherent relicensing and whatever?
>
> gcc:
> * doc/tm.texi.in (Addressing Modes) :
> M
I have just committed the patch below to add myself to the
write-after-approval section of the MAINTAINERS file.
Thanks,
Edmar
ChangeLog:
2012-05-29 Edmar Wienskoski
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
Index: MAINTAINERS
=
Attached patch applied then.
2012-05-29 François Dumont
* include/bits/stl_tempbuf.h (__uninitialized_construct_buf)
(__uninitialized_construct_buf_dispatch<>::__ucr): Fix to work
with iterator returning rvalue.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/stable_sort/3.cc: New.
François
On 05
Hi!
On Tue, 22 May 2012 11:38:55 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On May 22, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > an --enable-maintainers-build fails here with:
> >
> > configure.ac:99: error: possibly undefined macro: gcc_AC_FUNC_MMAP_BLACKLIST
> > If this token and others are legiti
Alan,
I think the following patch
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/powerpc.exp 2012-05-02
14:25:40.0 +0200
+++ ../work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/powerpc.exp2012-05-29
21:14:48.0 +0200
@@ -47,4 +47,5 @@ set-torture-options $SAVRES_TEST_OPTS
gcc-
I've applied these fixes for three miscellaneous directories with a single
typo each to fix (gcc/c-family, libmudflap, lto-plugin).
Index: libmudflap/mf-impl.h
===
--- libmudflap/mf-impl.h(revision 187979)
+++ libmudflap/mf-i
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Running the following command spots over 1500 typos, and suggests fixes:
>
> $ git ls-files|misspellings -f -|grep -v '^ERROR:'|perl -pe \
> 's/^(.*?)\[(\d+)\]: (\w+) -> "(.*?)"$/sed -i '\''${2}s!$3!$4!'\'' $1/' > k
This command has some bugs in how
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Meador Inge wrote:
> 2012-05-29 Meador Inge
>
> * c-decl.c (c_push_function_context): Always create a new language
> function.
> (c_pop_function_context): Clear the language function created in
> c_push_function_context.
Thanks, committed.
--
Jos
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
> So I tested the following semantics, with the ones that you pointed.
Thanks for the testing. The patch is OK with the ChangeLog conflict
markers removed (and the dates on log entries updated to the date of
commit).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codes
Hi, Uros!
Sorry, I didn't realize that patch was missed. I attached new version.
Changelog:
2012-05-29 Yuri Rumyantsev
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_sched_reorder): New function.
Added new function x86_sched_reorder.
As for multiply modes, currently we handled most frequent case f
Hi,
in this pretty old issue we crash for this testcase:
namespace N
{
namespace M = N;
namespace M {}// { dg-error "namespace alias" }
}
after the error message, because error recovery after error fails. We
try to do:
error ("namespace alias %qD not allowed here, assuming
On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
- for (i = 0; i< nelt; i += diff)
+ for (i = 0; i< nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
for (j = 0; j<= diff; j += 1)
- if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
- return false;
+ {
+ /* This is guaranteed to be true as the value of
Hi,
> This patch evaluates _FORTIFY_SOURCE in a way similar to GNU libc.
> If set, std::vector::operator[] throws if the index is out of bounds.
> This is compliant with the standard because such usage triggers
> undefined behavior. _FORTIFY_SOURCE users expect some performance hit.
Indeed. But
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This patch flags operator new on variably modified types as an error.
> If this is acceptable, this will simplify the implementation of the
> C++11 requirement to throw std::bad_array_new_length instead of
> allocating a memory region which
Hi All,
Last week I went to build a mips-gnu-linux toolchain and the built compiler
seg faulted while building glibc. Bisecting the change pointed to r187757. The
problem really goes back to r178692, which added support for
-Wunused-local-typedefs. r187757 just made it easier to hit by enabling
> Please do send such a patch (with an explanation in each case of how
> "validated" still gets set with that redundant setting removed).
>
'validated' can only be removed for user --specs switches, this is why I
think it doesn't need to be propagated to do_specs. My mistake from the
previous m
This patch flags operator new on variably modified types as an error.
If this is acceptable, this will simplify the implementation of the
C++11 requirement to throw std::bad_array_new_length instead of
allocating a memory region which is too short.
Okay for trunk? Or should I guard this with -fp
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Jim Meyering wrote:
> sed -i '8s!compability!compatibility!' config/mt-sde
> sed -i '21s!enviroments!environments!' config/stdint.m4
> sed -i '293s!arbitary!arbitrary!' config/tcl.m4
> sed -i '376s!arbitary!arbitrary!' config/tcl.m4
> sed -i '818s!apropriate!appropriate!' conf
On May 29, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While looking at libatomic's, I noticed that fixincludes' configure can't
> be regenerated without errors. Here is a patch, in spirit of
> 749dea2a0549c126a0e992a6dd8e9b5eb28e1cee. OK to commit?
Humm, looks like the same as Tobias
This patch evaluates _FORTIFY_SOURCE in a way similar to GNU libc.
If set, std::vector::operator[] throws if the index is out of bounds.
This is compliant with the standard because such usage triggers
undefined behavior. _FORTIFY_SOURCE users expect some performance hit.
Okay for trunk?
2012-05
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>
>> The avr backend auto-generates a part of the texi documentation by
>> means of a small C program. The relevant part of t-avr reads:
>>
>> s-avr-mmcu-texi: gen-avr-mmcu-texi$(build_exeext)
>> $(RUN_GEN) $< | sed -e 's:\r::g' > avr-mmcu.t
Hi!
While looking at libatomic's, I noticed that fixincludes' configure can't
be regenerated without errors. Here is a patch, in spirit of
749dea2a0549c126a0e992a6dd8e9b5eb28e1cee. OK to commit?
fixincludes/
* configure.ac: Use GCC_AC_FUNC_MMAP_BLACKLIST instead of
gcc_AC_FUNC_M
Hi!
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:35:31 +0200, I wrote:
> The subject already says it all. It got me confused what »funcs« that
> might be.
>
> OK to commit with regenerating configure?
>
> diff --git a/libatomic/acinclude.m4 b/libatomic/acinclude.m4
> index 282a992..a236a6d 100644
> --- a/libatomic/a
On 12-05-29 11:09 , Eric Botcazou wrote:
I can only formally approve the cse.c and expmed.c hunks, so you probably need
to run this by a GR.
The other changes are OK.
> Nice cleanup in any case!
Indeed. Though you probably made my next cxx-conversion merge more
difficult ;)
Thanks for do
> Done, updated diff attached.
You also need to adjust the ChangeLog:
* expmed.c (extract_fixed_bit_field): Add ??? for seemingly
outdated comment about integrate.c.
> OK for trunk?
I can only formally approve the cse.c and expmed.c hunks, so you probably need
to run this by a
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> For libjava and gcc/java changes, CC j...@gcc.gnu.org on the list (they
> may well be able to deal with the classpath typos although properly it's a
> separate project). For libstdc++-v3 changes (other than
> libstdc++-v3/doc/html/ext/ which are fi
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Jim Meyering wrote:
> sed -i '167s!Millenial!Millennial!' libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_string.c
> sed -i '30s!guranteed!guaranteed!' libgcc/config/libbid/bid64_fma.c
> sed -i '174s!oposite!opposite!' libgcc/config/libbid/bid64_fma.c
> sed -i '218s!oposite!opposite!' libgcc/conf
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Yes, I realize that, but it looks like that code is not doing
>> something because old integrate.c choked on it. Quoting that part of
>> the patch:
>>
>> Index: expmed.c
>> ===
Hi!
The subject already says it all. It got me confused what »funcs« that
might be.
OK to commit with regenerating configure?
diff --git a/libatomic/acinclude.m4 b/libatomic/acinclude.m4
index 282a992..a236a6d 100644
--- a/libatomic/acinclude.m4
+++ b/libatomic/acinclude.m4
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I've applied this patch to fix what seemed to be some of the more
> straightforward cases covered by gcc/ChangeLog.
Thanks. I've run the same thing on gettext and reported the results upstream.
This fixes PR53516 - we are happily vectorizing/memsetting stores
to bitfields. That's obviously wrong.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-05-29 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/53516
* tree-data-ref.c (stmt_with_adjacent_zero_
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Jim Meyering wrote:
> sed -i '464s!occurence!occurrence!' gcc/doc/include/texinfo.tex
> sed -i '4802s!achive!archive","achieve!' gcc/doc/include/texinfo.tex
I missed these when first listing files from upstream projects; anyway,
I've now updated texinfo.tex from upstream to
A lot of the changes are to files that GCC either imports strictly
verbatim with no local changes at all, or will make changes locally to
only for serious issues relating to integration with GCC; in either case,
such typos cannot justify making changes locally in GCC so if you want
those issues
Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Also note: the line numbers listed below work for me with yesterday's
>> up-to-date trunk, but if you want to use these commands, you should rerun
>> the commands above so that the line numbers reflect your actual sources.
>> )
>>
>> This is just a heads up.
>> I'm not vol
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
> I agree. I see two potential settings of the validated field. The %<
> that we just reviewed, and the case : /* We have Xno-YYY, search for
> XYYY. */
>
> It seems possible to remove those, I've just checked this during lunch
> :-) with the scenarios
On 12-05-25 18:29 , Cary Coutant wrote:
2012-05-25 Sterling Augustine
Cary Coutant
* gcc/dwarf2out.c (remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries): New function.
(is_class_die): Return TRUE for DW_TAG_structure_type.
(resolve_addr): Remove address table entries when rep
On May 29, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Running the following command spots over 1500 typos, and suggests fixes:
>
> $ git ls-files|misspellings -f -|grep -v '^ERROR:'|perl -pe \
> 's/^(.*?)\[(\d+)\]: (\w+) -> "(.*?)"$/sed -i '\''${2}s!$3!$4!'\'' $1/' > k
>
> The misspellings comma
> Also note: the line numbers listed below work for me with yesterday's
> up-to-date trunk, but if you want to use these commands, you should rerun
> the commands above so that the line numbers reflect your actual sources.
> )
>
> This is just a heads up.
> I'm not volunteering to make these chang
This puts checking code into place that we do not put globals
into referenced-vars (nor allocate var-annotations for them).
It also fixes remaining cases in mudflap and matrix-reorg.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-05-29 Richard Guenther
*
Hi,
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > The other change in function.c further improves the temp slot
> > machinery. While expanding free_temp_slots is called after each
> > statement, and if it is able to free a slot it needs to update the
> > RTX->slot mapping (a htab_t). The f
On May 26, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> how do I want the codebase to look like in 10, 15, 20, 25 years.
Gee, if the next 25 look just like the last 25, it will look very similar to
what it looks like today. :-)
On May 25, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 5/24/12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> You haven't looked at the most important problem of that approach
>> - code bloat.
>
> Are you claiming that the size of the binary is more important than
> run-time performance, type safety, and source c
On 05/29/2012 12:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
>
>>> The existing rule is supposed to be: options are only accepted if in
>>> *both* a .opt file *and* a spec. If not in a .opt file, the common
>>> machinery will reject them; if in a .opt file but
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As soon as line length goes over 200 bytes, read_line starts leaking
> memory (for line length x where x > 200 bytes it leaks
> ((1UL << ((x - 199) / 2)) - 1) * 200 bytes).
>
> This patch fixes it. As noted by Manuel, he copied that
On Mon, 21 May 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 05/16/12 07:53, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 May 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> [Sorry for the delay; I was on vacation.]
>
> I am forgoing the load avoidance code altogether to simplify things. Thanks.
>
> > + /* Emit the load code int
Hi!
As soon as line length goes over 200 bytes, read_line starts leaking
memory (for line length x where x > 200 bytes it leaks
((1UL << ((x - 199) / 2)) - 1) * 200 bytes).
This patch fixes it. As noted by Manuel, he copied that buggy code
from gcov.c, so this fixes gcov too.
Bootstrapped/regte
Hi,
On 05/29/2012 12:19 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
The _Pragma is effectively ignored,
hi Dodji, and sorry for taking the occasion to mention other issues with
pragmas which definitely can be handled separately, but I can't resist
;) In fact we have a number of open PRs:
http://gcc.gnu.or
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
> > The existing rule is supposed to be: options are only accepted if in
> > *both* a .opt file *and* a spec. If not in a .opt file, the common
> > machinery will reject them; if in a .opt file but not a spec, the driver's
> > own validation machiner
Hello,
Consider this short test snippet:
-8---
#define STRINGIFY(x) #x
#define TEST(x) \
_Pragma(STRINGIFY(GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-local-typedefs")) \
typedef int myint;
void bar ()
{
TEST(myint)
}
---
On 05/28/2012 06:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. I also applied as obvious the below, provided by Manuel, and
changing this warning too to use the new LangEnabledBy.
Paolo.
/
2012-05-29 Manuel López-Ibáñez
* c.opt (Wmissing-braces): Use LangEnabledB
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 25, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> Diego and I looked long and hard at this issue. It all came down
>> to a sequence of problems. First, libstdc++ isn't rigged for GTY,
>
> If portability to other C++ compilers wasn't a con
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch does some maintenance on alias.c:
>
> * Change reg_known_value from "rtx *" to a VEC(rtx).
> * Change reg_known_equiv_p from "char *" to an sbitmap.
>
> Nothing spectacular, just maintenance.
>
> Bootstrapped
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [for certain test cases :-) ]
>
> the temp slot cleanups I just sent where actually motivated by PR38474.
> It exposes many slownesses in the compiler, but at -O0 the only remaining
> one is the expand phase. expanding variables is th
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and this is a further small cleanup. pop_temp_slots is now the same as
> free_temp_slots (modulo the level-- of course), so there's no need in
> calling both. (and preserve_temp_slots(NULL) is useless now).
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-
> Yes, I realize that, but it looks like that code is not doing
> something because old integrate.c choked on it. Quoting that part of
> the patch:
>
> Index: expmed.c
> ===
> --- expmed.c (revision 187936)
> +++ expmed.c (working co
Hi,
This patch maintains Marvell PJ4 cores pipeline description.
Run arm testsuite on arm-linux-gnueabi and no extra regressions are found.
* config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: New marvell-pj4 pipeline description.
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_issue_rate): Add marvell_pj4.
* config/arm
Ping for:
On May 15, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got ICE in plus_constant (after the assertions were added) due to
> expand_expr_addr_expr_1 during build on ia64/Openvms.
>
> This function is called with TMODE == SImode (32 bit pointers) but EXP
> designating a vari
Ping for:
On May 15, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the end_prologue debug hook (only used by dwarf on VMS) is currently called
> at the NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG. This is not what its name implies, neither
> what the VMS debugger expect and neither what a comment in dwarf2o
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:57:28AM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> So, dear maintainers, is the patch below OK? It bootstraps on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu as well.
>
> PR bootstrap/53459
> * lex.c (search_line_fast): Avoid unused local typedefs to simulate
> a static assertion.
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> I have regstapped r187893 with the following patch
>
> [karma] gcc/darwin_buildw% diff -up ../_gcc_clean/libcpp/lex.c
> ../work/libcpp/lex.c
> --- ../_gcc_clean/libcpp/lex.c2012-05-25 08:54:05.0 +0200
> +++ ../work/libcpp/lex.c
On 05/28/2012 06:27 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/28/2012 01:11 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote:
>>>
I shared the same concern, however, after playing bits with spec toys, I
couldn't a
Hello,
The attached patch does some maintenance on alias.c:
* Change reg_known_value from "rtx *" to a VEC(rtx).
* Change reg_known_equiv_p from "char *" to an sbitmap.
Nothing spectacular, just maintenance.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Ciao!
Steven
alias_tlc.d
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> The attached patch moves the code from integrate.c to (what I hope you
>> agree to be) better places:
>>
>> * inliner code goes to tree-inline.c
>> * functions only called from dwarf2out.c are moved there.
>> * allocate_initial_values is mov
Since in 4.7, libgcc/config/aarch64/t-aarch64 only contains makefile rules for
crti.o and crtn.o and these rules are automatically added by the generic make
system, we can remove it. I have verified that ctri.o and ctrn.o are still
generated correctly.
Addition to libgcc/ChangeLog:
2012-05-28
This patch documents the AArch64 branch in wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html.
OK?
/Marcus
Proposed ChangeLog:
* htdocs/svn.html: Document aarch64 branch.diff -u -p -r1.173 svn.html
--- svn.html12 Apr 2012 01:26:33 - 1.173
+++ svn.html29 May 2012 07:28:17 -
@@ -395,6 +395
82 matches
Mail list logo
