On 05/13/2011 03:40 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
gcc/
* libgcc2.h (__NW, __NDW): Define using a __gnu_ prefix if
LIBGCC2_GNU_PREFIX is defined.
(__N): New macro.
(__powisf2, __powidf2, __powitf2, __powixf2, __bswapsi2, __bswapdi2,
__mulsc3, __muldc3, _
On 05/12/2011 05:40 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
+ if (targetm.calls.function_arg_round_to_arg_boundary (passed_mode, type))
+round_boundary = boundary;
+ else
+round_boundary = PARM_BOUNDARY;
Why add an if, instead of making the new target hook
function_arg_round_boundary? The default
Hello,
Attached is a new version of the patch.
Thanks to Dominique Dhumieres for testing on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10.
Tested ppc64-redhat-linux on both with -m32,-m64 and SPU.
OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Revital
testsuite/Changelog
PR rtl-optimization/47013
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>>>
>>> httpd being in the top-10 always, fiddling with bugzilla URLs?
>>> (Note, I don't have access to gcc.gnu.org, I'm relaying info from multiple
>>> instances of discussion on #gcc and richi poking on it; that said, it
>>> still might n
2011/5/17 H.J. Lu :
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
>> 2011/5/16 H.J. Lu :
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
Misdetected as Athlon by GCC, K6-2+ and K6-3+ are processors that support
extended 3DNow! but don't support extended MMX or CMOV.
>>
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> 2011/5/16 H.J. Lu :
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
>>> Misdetected as Athlon by GCC, K6-2+ and K6-3+ are processors that support
>>> extended 3DNow! but don't support extended MMX or CMOV.
>>>
>>> I don't own a K6-2 or Ath
2011/5/16 H.J. Lu :
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
>> Misdetected as Athlon by GCC, K6-2+ and K6-3+ are processors that support
>> extended 3DNow! but don't support extended MMX or CMOV.
>>
>> I don't own a K6-2 or Athlon machine. Can anybody have the patch tested?
>>
>> 2011
That will be good.
But you never know, we internally have fixed some bugs that filed to
us because people use kernel's old gcov code (many versions guarded by
ifdef) for their tests.
-Rong
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Rong Xu writes:
>
>>> The current kernel code is for
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > On 05/13/2011 03:03 AM, Rong Xu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * gcc/coverage.c (revision 173717): set a flag if building
>> >> for Linux kernel.
>> >> * gcc/tree-profile.c
Rong Xu writes:
>> The current kernel code is for gcc 3. That could be simply
>> replaced with a modern gcc 4 interface.
>
> You cannot replace. You have to keep the code for every gcc versions
> that being used.
I don't think it's a problem to not support gcc 3 gcov/profiling
anymore.
-Andi
-
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Jan Hubicka writes:
> >> Yep,
> >> I think it does make sense to share the implementation, but we need to find
> >> resonable way to do so.
> >
> > I doubt this will be very popular with the kernel community, which
> > prefers self containe
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>> Yep,
>> I think it does make sense to share the implementation, but we need to find
>> resonable way to do so.
>
> I doubt this will be very popular with the kernel community, which
> prefers self contained code.
Won't b
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>> Yep,
>> I think it does make sense to share the implementation, but we need to find
>> resonable way to do so.
>
> I doubt this will be very popular with the kernel community, which
> prefers self contained code.
>
> Also
Jan Hubicka writes:
> Yep,
> I think it does make sense to share the implementation, but we need to find
> resonable way to do so.
I doubt this will be very popular with the kernel community, which
prefers self contained code.
Also the interface doesn't change that often or does it?
The curren
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> The following patch improves hashing types by re-instantiating the
> patch that makes us visit aggregate target types of pointers and
> function return and argument types. This halves the collision
> rate on the type hash table for a li
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >> I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
> >> at some of the long running instances, and they were coming from
> >> searchb
Agreed.
David
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > On 05/13/2011 03:03 AM, Rong Xu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * gcc/coverage.c (revision 173717): set a flag if building
>> >> for Linux kernel.
>> >> * gcc/
On 05/13/2011 06:22 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
My initial implementation used a VEC to keep track of current deductions
in process, but I switched it to use a hash table instead; the overhead
for using a hash table rather than a VEC on the most common case (very
low deduction nesting) is small, but
Hi all,
here is a simple patch which takes care of fixing a memory leak, which
occurs when calling MOVE_ALLOC with allocatable scalar arguments. We
simply missed to deallocate the second argument 'TO', which is
INTENT(OUT), in case it is already allocated.
The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknow
Update _gfortran_set_options now that -std=f2008tr is supported for TR
29113, add a "TR 29113 Status" section, and update coarray entry now
that multiple images are (experimentally, incomplete) supported.
Committed as Rev. 173804.
Tobias
Index: gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
==
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
>> at some of the long running instances, and they were coming from
>> searchbots. I can't think of a good reason for this, so I have
>
Hello!
This patch backports recent fixes in FP moves from mainline to 4.5 and
4.6 branches.
2011-05-16 Uros Bizjak
* config/i386/i386.md (*movxf_internal): Disable CONST_DOUBLE
optimization for CM_MEDIUM and CM_LARGE code models. Fix usage
of standard_80387_constant_p
Hello,
* Tristan Gingold wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:20:19PM CEST:
> Ok for trunk ?
FWIW this looks good to me, and certainly necessary for Posix and
portable sed, but I can't approve it.
Thanks,
Ralf
> fixincludes/
> 2011-05-16 Tristan Gingold
>
> * inclhack.def (solaris_complex
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> I've seen us merge different named structs which happen to reside
>> on the same variant list. That's bogus, not only because we are
>> adjusting TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT during incremental type-merging and
>> fixup, so computing a persistent ha
Tobias Burnus wrote:
I intent to commit the attached patch soon,
unless you have concerns, comments or suggestions.
Committed - with the attachment follow up patch, which fixed validators
issues, added another item (-fbacktrace) and linkified some more flags.
Tobias
Index: changes.html
=
Bootstrapped without any issues. Running the entire testsuite with
--param=allow-store-data-races=0 is still in progress.
BTW, no regressions, even running the entire thing at
--param=allow-store-data-races=0 to force testing this new bitfield
implementation on all tests.
PR 48677 pointed out a mistake in my conversion of
lang_specific_driver to use decoded options. This is fixed by this
patch.
Bootstrapped with no regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied
to mainline. Will also apply to 4.6 branch to fix the regression
there subject to 4.6 branch testing
>
> I've seen us merge different named structs which happen to reside
> on the same variant list. That's bogus, not only because we are
> adjusting TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT during incremental type-merging and
> fixup, so computing a persistent hash by looking at it looks
> fishy as well.
Hi,
as reporte
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please note, that the patch also merges SImode and DImode call
> patterns, although SImode patterns use "lsm" constraint originally.
> The "l" constraint prevents %esp register, but since operand predicate
> already rejects %esp hard reg and %
Oops.
Paolo.
///
2011-05-16 Paolo Carlini
* include/std/utility: Simplify the last commit, the whole
std::get code is C++0x only.
Index: include/std/utility
===
--- include/std/utility (revision 17379
Hi,
also added the missing get(&&) overloads for std::array and std::pair.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Paolo.
//
2011-05-16 Paolo Carlini
* include/std/utility (get(std::pair<>&&)): Add.
* include/bits/stl_pair.h (pair::swap(pair&),
swap(pair
Richi, thank you for the detailed review!
I'll plan to move the power-series expansion into the existing IL walk
during pass_cse_sincos. As part of this, I'll move
tree_expand_builtin_powi and its subfunctions from builtins.c into
tree-ssa-math-opts.c. I'll submit this as a separate patch.
I wi
2011/5/16 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Denis Chertykov schrieb:
>> 2011/5/11 Georg-Johann Lay :
>>> Denis Chertykov schrieb:
2011/5/2 Georg-Johann Lay :
> This is a fix for an optimization flaw when a long value is composed
> from byte values.
>
> For -fsplit-wide-types (which is
On Mon, 16 May 2011 17:37:24 +0200
wrote:
> this patch is for the MELT branch.
>
> My GCC contributor number is 634276.
[...]
> 2011-05-16 Pierre Vittet
>
> * Makefile.in: remove useless use of MELTHERE_CFLAGS,
> remove variable MELTHERE_CC1_CFLAGS, as it takes its arg from
>
On 05/10/2011 03:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I've found it useful to use a construct such as the following:
>
> (define_attr "units64"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (const_string "unknown"))
>
> (define_attr "units64p"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (attr "units64
Georg-Johann Lay schrieb:
> Richard Henderson schrieb:
>
>> Why are you adding "optimize" to all these insns? None of them will
>> be matched unless combine is run, which implies optimization.
>
> Here is a patch without optimize in the insn conditions.
>
> The optimize condition is still prese
On May 16, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Yes, it is ok on GNU/Linux and Solaris.
>>
>> Do I really need to test on HP/UX and AIX ? Won't be easy for me.
>
> Solaris and BSD are usually the most unusual, so I'd
Hi Tristan,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Yes, it is ok on GNU/Linux and Solaris.
>
> Do I really need to test on HP/UX and AIX ? Won't be easy for me.
Solaris and BSD are usually the most unusual, so I'd say go ahead for mainline
and see if you get squawks. With se
Hello,
this patch is for the MELT branch.
My GCC contributor number is 634276.
In a previous commit MELTHERE_CFLAGS was remove. I could still find a
few references to it in the gcc/Makefile.in. I have also removed
MELTHERE_CC1_CFLAGS as it takes its value from a subset of
MELTHERE_CFLAGS
T
Denis Chertykov schrieb:
> 2011/5/11 Georg-Johann Lay :
>> Denis Chertykov schrieb:
>>> 2011/5/2 Georg-Johann Lay :
>>>
This is a fix for an optimization flaw when a long value is composed
from byte values.
For -fsplit-wide-types (which is still default for avr) the code is
2011/5/16 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Denis Chertykov schrieb:
>> 2011/5/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
>>> Nathan Froyd schrieb:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> PR45099 is an extension that gives an error when a fixed register is
> needed to pass a parameter to a fu
On May 16, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
>> the syntax should be:
>>
>> [2addr]c\
>> text
>>
>> (Note the trailin
I've seen us merge different named structs which happen to reside
on the same variant list. That's bogus, not only because we are
adjusting TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT during incremental type-merging and
fixup, so computing a persistent hash by looking at it looks
fishy as well.
Bootstrapped and tested on
On 05/03/2011 02:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I also removed the recursion from copy_statement_list because it
would just extra garbage STATEMENT_LISTs since they're already copied by
the normal walk_tree.
I was wrong about this, the recursion is necessary because
tsi_link_after destroys STATEM
Denis Chertykov schrieb:
> 2011/5/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
>> Nathan Froyd schrieb:
>>> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
PR45099 is an extension that gives an error when a fixed register is
needed to pass a parameter to a function.
Because the progra
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 11:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Froyd
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
The following patch improves hashing types by re-instantiating the
patch that makes us visit aggregate target types of pointers and
function return and argument types. This halves the collision
rate on the type hash table for a linux-kernel build and improves
WPA compile-time from 3mins to 1mins
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> > I think conversion _to_ BOOLEAN_TYPE shouldn't be useless, on the
>> > grounds that it requires booleanization (at least conceptually), i.e.
>> > conversion to a set of two values (no
Hashes of SCC members have been poor since ever as we have to ensure
they are the same when the SCC is entered from a different path. But
we can do better and mixin SCC member hashes if we can sort the SCC
in some way. And we can do so, when sorting after the hash values.
The only thing we need
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > I think conversion _to_ BOOLEAN_TYPE shouldn't be useless, on the
> > grounds that it requires booleanization (at least conceptually), i.e.
> > conversion to a set of two values (no matter the precision or size)
> > based on the outcome of c
On 05/16/2011 02:42 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/16/2011 02:32 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
> It routinely is. bugzilla performance is terrible most of the time
> for me (up to t
Hello!
Attached patch introduces "z" constraint that matches
constant_call_address_operand predicate. Using this constraint,
several similar call patterns can be merged into one, substantially
lowering the number of similar call patterns.
Please note, that the patch also merges SImode and DImode
Hi Tristan,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Sure. [If] The patch below is ok for 'make check', is it also ok for you ?
Yes, thank you.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 02:32 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
It routinely is. bugzilla performance is terrible most of the time
for me (up to the point of five timeouts in sequence), svn speed is
>>>
Hi Tristan,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
> the syntax should be:
>
> [2addr]c\
> text
>
> (Note the trailing back-slash).
> But as currently written, there is no backslash in
On May 16, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the main VMS include files has a dollar in its name (decc$types.h),
>> which is not shell friendly.
>>
>> As a consequence, when the name is reused by check.tpl to crea
On 05/16/2011 02:32 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>>> It routinely is. bugzilla performance is terrible most of the time
>>> for me (up to the point of five timeouts in sequence), svn speed is
>>> mediocre at best, and people with access to gcc.gnu.org
On May 16, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Tristan Gingold writes:
>
>> 2011-05-16 Tristan Gingold
>>
>> * check.tpl: Shell-quote testing file.
>>
>> diff --git a/fixincludes/check.tpl b/fixincludes/check.tpl
>> index b239d8b..0f3937a 100644
>> --- a/fixincludes/check.tpl
>>
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the main VMS include files has a dollar in its name (decc$types.h),
> which is not shell friendly.
>
> As a consequence, when the name is reused by check.tpl to create a baseline
> file, must be quoted.
> Ok for trunk ?
>
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > It routinely is. bugzilla performance is terrible most of the time
> > for me (up to the point of five timeouts in sequence), svn speed is
> > mediocre at best, and people with access to gcc.gnu.org often observe
> > loads > 25, mostly due to I
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> We can't use a test for BOOLEAN_TYPE as the middle-end considers a
>> INTEGER_TYPE with same precision/signedness as compatible and thus may
>> propagate a variable of INTEGER_TYPE ther
Tristan Gingold writes:
> 2011-05-16 Tristan Gingold
>
> * check.tpl: Shell-quote testing file.
>
> diff --git a/fixincludes/check.tpl b/fixincludes/check.tpl
> index b239d8b..0f3937a 100644
> --- a/fixincludes/check.tpl
> +++ b/fixincludes/check.tpl
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ FOR fix =][=
>
On 05/16/2011 02:22 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
It's not quite the same information, surely. Wouldn't searchers be
directed to an email rather than the bug itself?
>>>
>>> Yes, though there is a link in all mails.
>>
>> Right, so we are
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> It's not quite the same information, surely. Wouldn't searchers be
> >> directed to an email rather than the bug itself?
> >
> > Yes, though there is a link in all mails.
>
> Right, so we are contemplating a reduction in search quality in exch
Hi,
this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
the syntax should be:
[2addr]c\
text
(Note the trailing back-slash).
But as currently written, there is no backslash in it. As a consequence 'make
check' fails at least on Darwin (BSD derived sed
comman
On 05/16/2011 02:10 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/16/2011 01:09 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
On 16/05/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM,
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> We can't use a test for BOOLEAN_TYPE as the middle-end considers a
> INTEGER_TYPE with same precision/signedness as compatible and thus may
> propagate a variable of INTEGER_TYPE there. I don't understand why
> promoting bools to boolean_type
Hi,
one of the main VMS include files has a dollar in its name (decc$types.h),
which is not shell friendly.
As a consequence, when the name is reused by check.tpl to create a baseline
file, it must be quoted.
This is what is implemented in this patch.
Tested by 'make check' in fixincludes/
Ok
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 01:09 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/05/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I noticed that buglist.cgi
Andrew Haley writes:
> It's not quite the same information, surely. Wouldn't searchers be directed
> to an email rather than the bug itself?
The mail contains the bugzilla link, so they can easily get there if
needed.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 D
On 05/16/2011 01:09 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> On 16/05/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
at some o
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> Misdetected as Athlon by GCC, K6-2+ and K6-3+ are processors that support
> extended 3DNow! but don't support extended MMX or CMOV.
>
> I don't own a K6-2 or Athlon machine. Can anybody have the patch tested?
>
> 2011-05-16 Zuxy Meng
> PR i386/
Hello,
this fixes the ADA parts of PR middle-end/48989. For Fortran I am
still looking, what actual the cause is.
ChangeLog
2011-05-16 Kai Tietz
PR middle-end/48989
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Exception_Handler_to_gnu_sjlj): Use
boolean_false_node instead of integer_zero_n
This patch continues cleaning up x86 option handling to use .opt
features, by cleaning up the -mfpmath= handling.
This is somewhat complicated because of these options being generated
by attributes. I exposed a new interface from opts-common.c to be
used to convert a string to an enum value as if
Hi!
This patch contains a bunch of smaller debug info improvements:
1) on the typeddwarf.c testcase on x86_64 there were completely needlessly
many DW_OP_GNU_entry_value ops emitted, while the corresponding argument
registers were still live. Fixed by the cselib_subst_to_values hunk.
2) var
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 16/05/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >> I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
> >> at some of the long running instances, and they were coming fr
On 16/05/11 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
>> at some of the long running instances, and they were coming from
>> searchbots. I can't think of a good reason for t
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Those issues should be fixed by the attached patch, which relaxes
>> strictness of logical operations in tree-cfg.c file.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> 2011-05-14 Kai Tietz
>>
>> * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_unary): Don't enforce
>> boolea
I intent to commit the attached patch soon,
unless you have concerns, comments or suggestions.
Tobias
? changes.diff
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1
> 2011-05-15 Dmitry Gorbachev
>
> * gengtype-state.c (read_state_param_structs): Initialize "previous".
The logic in the function is OK, is this to silence some false positive warning?
In any case, the patch is OK, I assume you have tested it.
Thanks,
--
Laurynas
2011/5/16 Nicola Pero :
> 2011-05-16 Nicola Pero
>
> * gengtype.c (walk_type): Implemented "atomic" GTY option.
> * doc/gty.texi (GTY Options): Document "atomic" GTY option.
The patch is OK, with difference between "skip" and "atomic" options
documented. (Can be done as a follow-u
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I noticed that buglist.cgi was taking quite a bit of CPU time. I looked
> at some of the long running instances, and they were coming from
> searchbots. I can't think of a good reason for this, so I have
> committed this patch to the gcc
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:45 -0800, Carrot Wei wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Compile the following c code with options -march=armv7-a -mthumb -Os
>>
>> int foo (int s)
>> {
>> return s == 1;
>> }
>>
>> GCC 4.6 generates:
>>
>> :
>> 0
> Yes why can't you use vec(int,gc)?
Can you use that in libiberty ? I thought it was a GCC-only thing ?
Thanks
>>> This patch adds a new GTY option, "atomic", which is similar to the
>>> identical option you have with Boehm GC
>>> and which can be used with pointers to inform the GC/PCH machinery that
>>> they point to an area of memory that
>> [...]
>>> This patch basically implements it, but at this st
> Does the attached patch resolve the failure with sms-8.c?
Yes. Thanks for the update.
Dominique
86 matches
Mail list logo
