[Bug libgcj/20435] regex pattern compiling bug

2005-05-28 Thread ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 18:06 --- Confirmed. This regular expression makes use of possessive quantifiers (?+, *+, ++, {n,m}+), which gnu.regexp doesn't support currently. I've written some Mauve test cases[1] for possessive quant

[Bug libgcj/20435] regex pattern compiling bug

2005-05-28 Thread ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 20:55 --- Proposed patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/2416 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435